Anatomical description of the umbilical arteries and impact of their ligation on pelvic and perineal vascular supply after cystectomy in women
- 23 Downloads
In radical cystectomy, the surgeon generally ligates the umbilical artery at its origin. This artery may give rise to several arteries that supply the sexual organs. Our aim was to evaluate pelvic and perineal devascularisation in women after total cystectomy.
Patients and methods
We carried out a prospective anatomical and radiological study. We performed bilateral pelvic dissections of fresh adult female cadavers to identify the dividing branches of the umbilical artery. In parallel, we examined and compared the pre- and postoperative imaging investigations [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) angiography] in patients undergoing cystectomy for benign disease to quantify the loss of pelvic vascularisation on the postoperative images by identifying the occluded arteries.
The anatomical study together with the radiological study visualised 35 umbilical arteries (n = 70) with their branching patterns and collateral arteries. The uterine artery originated from the umbilical artery in more than 75% of cases (n = 54) of the internal pudendal artery in 34% (n = 24) and the vaginal artery in 43% (n = 30). The postoperative MRI angiograms showed pelvic devascularisation in four patients. Devascularisation was dependent on the level of surgical ligation. In the four patients with loss of pelvic vascular supply, the umbilical artery had been ligated at its origin.
The umbilical artery gives rise to various branches that supply the pelvis and perineum. If the surgeon ligates the umbilical artery at its origin during total cystectomy, there is a significant risk of pelvic and perineal devascularisation.
KeywordsCystectomy Sexual dysfunction Umbilical artery Urinary bladder Women
We would like to thank Dr Lucie Even for help in collecting the data.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.
- 2.Cerruto MA, D’Elia C, Siracusano S, Gedeshi X, Mariotto A, Iafrate M, Niero M, Lonardi C, Bassi P, Belgrano E, Imbimbo C, Racioppi M, Talamini R, Ciciliato S, Toffoli L, Rizzo M, Visalli F, Verze P, Artibani W (2016) Systematic review and meta-analysis of non RCT’s on health related quality of life after radical cystectomy using validated questionnaires: Better results with orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(3):343–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Elzevier HW, Nieuwkamer BB, Pelger RC, Lycklama a Nijeholt AA (2007) Female sexual function and activity following cystectomy and continent urinary tract diversion for benign indications: a clinical pilot study and review of literature. J Sex Med 4(2):406–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00257.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Game X, Mallet R, Guillotreau J, Berrogain N, Mouzin M, Vaessen C, Sarramon JP, Malavaud B, Rischmann P (2007) Uterus, fallopian tube, ovary and vagina-sparing laparoscopic cystectomy: technical description and results. Eur Urol 51(2):441–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.06.052 (discussion 446).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Klingele CJ, Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, Gebhart JB, Riederer SG, Zinsmeister AR (2005) Pelvic organ prolapse in defecatory disorders. Obstet Gynecol 106(2):315–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000171104.72972.34 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Mischinger J, Abdelhafez MF, Todenhofer T, Schwentner C, Aufderklamm S, Stenzl A, Gakis G (2015) Quality of life outcomes after radical cystectomy: long-term standardized assessment of Studer Pouch versus I-Pouch. World J Urol 33(10):1381–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1461-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar