Surgical anatomy of the right gastro-omental artery: a study on 100 cadaver dissections
- 95 Downloads
The gastro-omental artery (GOA) with the greater omentum (GO) is known for its high quality as a vascular graft, its resistance to infections as an omental flap and for its multiple applications in surgery. A better knowledge of anatomical variations of GO and its vascularization can improve the application in surgery and decrease complications. The purpose of this study was to measure diameters and lengths of the right GOA (RGOA) and study the interindividual variability of these anatomical structures.
In 100 cadaveric dissections, we carried out dissection of the RGOA and of the GO. In 70 unfixed cadavers, the transillumination technique was used to identify all RGOA branches. In the remaining 30 cadavers, prepared with Winckler’s solution, barium sulfate with colored latex was injected. Digital X-ray was used to measure RGOA lengths, internal diameters and the distribution of the omental branches. The gastro-omental vein was also dissected.
The mean proximal and distal diameters of RGOA were 2.68 (± 0.39) mm and 0.94 (± 0.24) mm, respectively. The mean length was 244.3 (± 34.4) mm. The thickness of the omentum ranged from 5 to 15.5 mm. The arteria omentalis magna, defined in this study for the fist time as the longest and widest omental branch, was present in 73.3% cases. The trans-omental arch was present in 6% cases.
This morphometric study allowed us to define the vascularization and the anatomical variations of RGOA and GO. This may lead to improvement of applications in surgery and decrease complications.
KeywordsAnatomical study Gastro-omental artery Cadaver dissections Greater omentum Arteria omentalis magna Transillumination
We are grateful to the donors and their families for giving us this opportunity to extend our knowledge of human anatomy. We thank Dr. Claudio Vassallo for his assistance in the analysis of the statistical data and Beata Przybyla for assistance in the revision of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 2.Arnaud M (1927) Les vaisseaux du grand épiploon. Arch Franco Belges de Chir 30:58–65Google Scholar
- 4.Beau A, Prévot J (1956) A propos des relations entre le grand épiploon, le côlon transverse et son méso. C.R. Association des Anatomistes, 42ème réunion Paris, pp 277–286Google Scholar
- 6.Bouchet A (1962) Anatomic and technical details relative to surgery of the greater omentum. J Chir (Paris) 83:265–274Google Scholar
- 7.Bourgeon A, Tran DK, Abbes M, Clermont C, Lebreton E, Richelme H (1973) Etude de la vascularisation du grand épiploon. Applications chirurgicales. Bull Assoc Anat 57:829–838Google Scholar
- 9.Cathala B (1975) Etude radio-anatomique de la vascularisation du grand épiploon. Thèse Toulouse n. 263Google Scholar
- 10.Chauzy A (1956) Contribution à l’étude de la vascularisation artérielle du grand épiploon. Thèse LyonGoogle Scholar
- 12.Descomps P (1916) Epiploon et péricolite. Rev Chir 51:109–137Google Scholar
- 15.Hollender LF, Bur F (1985) Chirurgie du grand épiploon. In: Springer, Berlin, pp 1–23Google Scholar
- 19.Kiricuta I (1963) The use of the great omentum in the surgery of breast cancer. Presse Médicale 5:71:15–17Google Scholar
- 20.Levasseur JC, Couinaud C (1968) Study of the distribution of gastric arteries. 2d part: surgical incidences. J Chir (Paris) 95:161–176Google Scholar
- 26.Serafin D (1996) Atlas of microsurgical composite tissue transplantation. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 32.Winckler G (1974) Manuel d’anatomie topographique et fonctionnelle. Masson et Cie, Paris, pp 1–2Google Scholar