Prevalence of ponticulus posticus among patients with different dental malocclusions by digital lateral cephalogram: a comparative study
- 198 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of ponticulus posticus among patients with dental Angle class I, II, and III malocclusions in Middle Anatolian population.
A total of 1246 cephalometric radiographs were examined in a 6 months period. Each patient was assigned an identification number, and demographic information, absence/presence of PP, if present, type of PP and type of dental malocclusion were recorded by two observers. In cases where there was any disagreement, a third observer was consulted. Distributions of obtained values were analysed using Pearson’s Chi-square test.
The mean age of subjects was 20.98 ± 6.95 years (range 10–39). In the analysed sample, PP had a prevalence of 18.8 % (complete form 9.6 %, incomplete form 9.2 %). There was a significant difference between genders (p = 0.002) (more prevalent in male patients: 119/522; 23 %). No significant difference was found between age groups (p > 0.05). PP was most frequently detected in Angle class III patients (78/351; 22.2 %) but there was no significant difference between malocclusion groups (p > 0.05).
In the present study, PP is found to be a relatively common anomaly in patients with dental malocclusions. Although Angle class III patients showed a higher frequency of PP, statistically no significant difference was found among dental malocclusion groups.
KeywordsPonticulus posticus Lateral cephalometric radiography Dental malocclusion
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest.
- 2.Bayrakdar IS, Miloglu O, Altun O, Gumussoy I, Durna D, Yilmaz AB (2014) Cone beam computed tomography imaging of ponticulus posticus: prevalence, characteristics, and a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118:e210–e219. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.09.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bui C, King T, Proffit W, Frazier-Bowers S (2006) Phenotypic characterization of Class III patients. Angle Orthod 76:564–569. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0564:PCOCIP]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- 7.D’Attilio M, Epifania E, Ciuffolo F, Salini V, Filippi MR, Dolci M, Festa F, Tecco S (2004) Cervical lordosis angle measured on lateral cephalograms. Findings in skeletal class II female subjects with and without TMD: a cross sectional study. Cranio-the J Craniomandib Pract 22:27–44Google Scholar
- 9.Eriksen K (2003) Upper cervical subluxation complex: a review of chiropractic and medical literature. In: Eriksen K (ed) Vertebral arteries. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 57Google Scholar
- 10.Festa F, Tecco S, Dolci M, Ciufolo F, Di Meo S, Filippi MR, Ferritto AL, D’Attillio M (2003) Relationship between cervical lordosis and facial morphology in Caucasian women with a skeletal class II malocclusion: a cross-sectional study. Cranio-the J Craniomandib Pract 21:121–129Google Scholar
- 14.Hong JT, Lee SW, Son BC, Sung JH, Yang SH, Kim IS, Park CK (2008) Analysis of anatomical variations of bone and vascular structures around the posterior atlantal arch using three-dimensional computed tomography angiography. J Neurosurg-Spine 8:230–236. doi: 10.3171/Spi/2008/3/3/230 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lippold C, Danesh G, Hoppe G, Drerup B, Hackenberg L (2006) Sagittal spinal posture in relation to craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod 76:625–631. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0625:SSPIRT]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar
- 22.Proffit WR (2000) Contemporary orthodontics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St.Louis, pp 2–3Google Scholar
- 23.Sabir H, Kumbhare S, Rout P (2014) Evaluation of ponticulus posticus on digital lateral cephalograms and cone beam computed tomography in patients with migraine and healthy individuals: a comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118:348–354. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.04.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Takaaki M, Masanori O, Hidenori U, Eikazu H, Seisuke T, Sotaro I (1979) Ponticulus ponticus: its clinical significance. Acta Med Kinki Univ 4:427–430Google Scholar