Abstract
Background
Magnetic resonance imaging has become the method of choice to diagnose meniscal and ligament lesions of the knee. New approaches to the surgical treatment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears led us to try to distinguish the two bundles of that ligament with MRI and to evaluate inter-observer agreement in different viewing planes.
Methods
Images of 50 right and 50 left ligament-intact knees were examined in the coronal and axial viewing planes. Each sequence was independently read by a radiologist and a medical student to note, in each viewing plane, the number of images in which the two-bundle structure of the ligament was clearly seen. Cohen’s Kappa coefficients were used to determine inter-observer agreements.
Results
The percentage of sequences in which the two bundles were distinguished by the radiologist and the student on one image at least were 82 versus 73% in the coronal plane and 90 versus 93% in the axial plane, respectively. The average number of successive images with clear bundles was higher in the axial (2.7 vs. 1.7) than in the coronal plane (2.2 vs. 1). There was a poor inter-observer agreement in the coronal plane (k = 0.176) but an intermediate agreement in the axial plane (k = 0.385 or 0.522 depending on number pooling).
Conclusions
The axial viewing plane seems more favourable to distinguish the two bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament with the best possible reproducibility. An oblique-axial plane is deemed to insure a clearer diagnosis of partial tears.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amis AA, Dawkins GPC (1991) Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 73(2):260–267
Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:27–46
Drapé JL, Godefroy D, Dupont AM, Chevrot A (1999) Radio-anatomie du genou. Encyclopédie Médico Chirurgicale 80(6 Suppl):628–639
Duc SR, Zanetti M, Kramer J, Kach KP, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament tears: evaluation of standard orthogonal and tailored paracoronal images. Acta Radiol 46(7):729–733
Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel JH, Fritschy D, Menetrey J (2006) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:204–213
Giris FG, Marshall JL, Al Monajem ARS (1975) The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint: anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 106:216–231
Giron F, Cuomo P, Aglietti P, Bull AM, Amis AA (2006) Femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:250–256
Hollis JM, Takai S, Adam DJ, Horibe S, Woo SL (1991) The effects of knee motion and external loading on the length of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL): a kinematic study. J Biomech Eng 113:208–214
Hong SH, Choi JY, Lee GK, Choi JA, Chung HW, Kang HS (2003) Grading of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Diagnostic efficacy of oblique coronal magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(5):814–819
Katahira K, Yamashita Y, Takahashi M et al (2001) MR imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament: value of thin slice direct oblique coronal technique. Radiat Med 19(1):1–7
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Lee JK, Yao L, Phelps CT, Writh CR, Czajka J, Lozman J (1988) Anterior cruciate ligament tears: MR imaging compared with arthroscopy and clinical tests. Radiology 166:861–864
Lerman JE, Gray DS, Schweitzer ME, Bartolozzi A (1995) MR evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament: value of axial images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19(4):604–607
Mellado JM, Calmet J, Olona M, Gine J, Saturi A (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of anterior cruciate ligament: reevaluation of quantative parameters and imaging findings including a simplified method for measuring the anterior cruciate ligament angle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(3):217–224
Odensten M, Gillquist J (1985) Functionnal anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:257–262
Polly DW Jr, Callaghan JJ, Sikes RA, McCabe JM, McMahon K, Savory CG (1988) The accuracy of selective magnetic resonance imaging compared with the findings of arthtroscopy of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:192–197
Reicher MA, Rauschning W, Gold RH (1985) High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint: normal anatomy. Am J Roentgenol 145:895–902
Starman JS, VanBeek C, Armfield DR, Sahasrabudhe A, Baker CLIII, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2007) Assessment of normal ACL double anatomy in standard viewing planes by magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 167(6):266–268
Steckel H, Vadala G, Davis D, Fu FH (2006) 2D and 3D 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the double bundle structure in anterior cruciate ligament anatomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1151–1158
Turner DA, Prodromos CC, Petasnik JP, Clark JW (1985) Acute injury of the ligaments of the knee: magnetic resonance evaluation. Radiology 154(4):717–722
Umans H, Wimpfheimer O, Haramati N, Applbaum YH, Adler M, Bosco J (1995) Diagnosis of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: value of MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 165(4):893–897
Vaz CES, de Camargo OP, de Santana PJ, Valei AC (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance in identifying traumatic intraarticular knee lesions. Clinics 60(6):445–450
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Payet Barry, internist, Centre Hospitalier de Roanne, and Dr. Jean Iwaz, scientific advisor, Hospices Civils de Lyon, for review and editing of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montoy, M., Euvrard, T., Moyen, B. et al. Inter-observer agreement in the identification of the two bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 30, 557–562 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0370-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0370-1