Irrigation Science

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 37–47 | Cite as

Effect of optimization forms of flow path on emitter hydraulic and anti-clogging performance in drip irrigation system

Original Paper


This study aims to solve the problem of emitter clogging by optimizing the flow path boundary and making it self-cleaning, thereby reducing cost of drip irrigation project to promote water-saving irrigation technologies. To resolve the question of whether the emitter optimizations should retain the vortex area with low velocity, which are the two main optimization ideas currently, we used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to evaluate the most commonly used emitter, one with a tooth-type labyrinth flow path. A re-normalization group (RNG) k–ε turbulence model was used to evaluate two types of main channel anti-clogging designs, whose vortex was retained, and three types of washing walls—all types that use a vortex. The result of the flow state analysis showed that, as for the hydraulic performance, the flow state indexes of flow paths optimized by two types of design method were up to 5% lower than that of prototype’s flow path. Flow coefficients of the flow path optimized using the main channel design method were 4–6 times higher than that of the prototype’s flow path, which could significantly increase the construction cost of emitter and drip irrigation system. However, the flow coefficients of flow path optimized by design method of washing wall with vortex were up to 3% lower than the prototype’s flow path; thus, their effect on the emitter’s hydraulic performance can be ignored. As for the anti-clogging performance, there was nearly no vortex area formed in the flow path optimized by the main channel design method, and the sediment could flow out easily from the emitter. However, the emitter’s ability to resist biological and chemical clogging was weak, because the sediment content was highest in the tooth-tip facing-water zone where the sediments deposit easily. The overall intensity of turbulence was lower than that of the prototype, and the velocity near the wall was lower than in other optimized forms. The design method of washing wall with vortex could make the vortex fully develop in the flow path, and enhance the velocity near wall and turbulent intensity in the area where sediment deposited easily. The cycle motion of vortex could wash the wall, which could keep the viscous clogging material from attaching the wall and promote their detachment. The emitter’s self-cleaning ability was also enhanced. Overall, the flow path optimized by design method of washing wall with vortex could enhance synergistically hydraulic and anti-clogging performance in the easiest and most cost-effective way. As for the tooth labyrinth flow path, the best boundary optimization form was that the tooth-tip backing-water zone, tooth-tip facing-water zone, tooth-root backing-water zone and tooth-root facing-water zone were optimized by the same arc whose radius was equal to 1/2 width of the flow path. This study could provide theoretical reference for emitter structural design.



We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Fund of China (51479197, 51321001), the Special Scientific Research Fund of Public Welfare Profession of China (201401078), and the major science and technology projects in Inner Mongolia ([2014]117-05). The first author also appreciates the financial support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC) as a visiting PhD student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.


  1. Arbata G, Pujolb T, Puig-Barguésa J et al (2013) An experimental and analytical study to analyze hydraulic behavior of nozzle-type underdrains in porous media filters. Agric Water Manag 126:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boudier G, Gicquel LY, Poinsot MT et al (2007) Comparison of LES, RANS and experiments in an aeronautical gas turbine combustion chamber. Proc Combust Inst 31(2):3075–3082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bucks DA, Nakayama FS, Gilbert RG (1979) Trickle irrigation water quality and preventive maintenance. Agric Water Manag 2:149–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Capra A, Scicolone B (2004) Emitter and filter tests for wastewater reuse by drip. Agric Water Manag 68(2):135–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandra A, Madramootoo JM (2013) Advances and challenges with micro-irrigation. Irrig Drain 62(3):255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duran-Ros M, Puig-Bargues J, Arbat A et al (2009) Effect of filter, emitter, and location on clogging when using effluents. Agric Water Manag 96:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elbana M, de Cartagena FR, Puig-Bargués J (2012) Effectiveness of sand media filters for removing turbidity and recovering dissolved oxygen from a reclaimed effluent used for micro-irrigation. Agric Water Manag 111:27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fröhlich J, von Terzi D (2008) Hybrid LES/RANS methods for the simulation of turbulent flows. Prog Aerosp Sci 44(5):349–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. GB standards, GB/T 7187-1997 (1997) Agricultural irrigation equipment—emitter technical specifications and test methodsGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghaemi AA, Chieng ST (1998) Impact of emitter clogging on hydraulic characteristics in micro-irrigation: field Evaluation. In: Proceeding of the Canadian Sherbrooke, Qubec, pp 162–171Google Scholar
  11. Li YK (2005) The flow path design, and flow characteristics test and numerical simulation of fractal flow path in emitter. China Agricultural University, Beijing (Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  12. Li YK, Yang PL, Xu TW et al (2008) CFD and digital particle tracking to assess flow characteristics in the labyrinth flow path of a drip irrigation emitter. Irrig Sci 26(5):427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu HS, Li YK, Liu YZ et al (2010) Flow characteristics in energy dissipation units of labyrinth path in the drip irrigation emitters with dpiv techonloty. J Hydrodyn 22(1):137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marzio P, Enrico N, Thomas J (2002) DNS study of turbulent transport at low Prandtl numbers in a channel flow. J Fluid Mech 458:419–441Google Scholar
  15. Megh RG (2012) Management of drip/trickle or micro irrigation. Apple Academic Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. Niu WQ, Yu LM, Wu PT (2010) Anti-clogging experimental investigation and optimized design of micro-channels of emitter based on isoline of sand content. Trans CSAE 26(5):14–20 (Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  17. Ribeiro TAP, Paterniani JES, Airoldi RPS et al (2008) Comparison between disc and non-woven synthetic fabric filter media to prevent emitter clogging. Trans ASABE 51(2):41–453Google Scholar
  18. Salvador G, Arviza J, Bralts F (2004) Hydraulic flow behaviour throngh an in-line emitter labyrinth using CFD Techniqued. ASAE/CSAE Annual International Meeting. Fairmont Chateau Laurier, The Westin, Government Centre Ottawa, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  19. Sun HS (2014) The test for the movement characteristics of water and particles in drip irrigationemitter. China Agricultural University, Beijing (Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  20. Wei ZY, Tang YP, Zhao WH et al (2005a) Structure and hydraulic performance experimental research on labyrinth channels of drip irrigation emitters. Trans CSAM 36(12):51–55 (Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  21. Wei ZY, Zhao WH, Tang YP et al (2005b) Research on anti-clogging design method of main channel for emitter with the labyrinth flow path. Trans CSAE 21(6):1–7 (Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  22. Yu LM, Mei QY (2014) Anti-clogging design and experimental investigation of PIV for labyrinth-channel emitters of drip irrigation emitters. Trans CSAM 45(9):155–160 (Chinese with English abstract) Google Scholar
  23. Zhang J, Zhao WH, Wei ZY et al (2007) Numerical and experimental study on hydraulic performance of emitters with arc labyrinth channels. Comput Electron Agric 56:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Water Resources and Civil EngineeringChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Science and EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbana-ChampaignUSA
  3. 3.Huilongguan Water Station in Changping DistrictBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations