Irrigation Science

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 25–35 | Cite as

The response of field-grown mango (cv. Keitt) trees to regulated deficit irrigation at three phenological stages

  • A. G. Levin
  • M. Peres
  • M. Noy
  • C. Love
  • Y. Gal
  • A. Naor
Original Paper
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of the current study was to examine the effect of different irrigation levels at different phenological stages on fruit yield, fruit size, vegetative growth, and subsequent season crop yield of mango trees growing in sub-tropical weather conditions. Three independent experiments were conducted in parallel in three phenological stages: main fruit growth (MFG)—from fruit set to pit hardening; final fruit growth (FFG)—from pit hardening up to harvest; and post-harvest (PH)—after harvest until the first meaningful rain. Each experiment was consisted of four irrigation levels that were determined as crop coefficients of Penman–Monteith evapotranspiration. Differential irrigation levels were applied in each phenological stage, where commercial irrigation levels were applied in the rest of the season. Crop yield in the MFG stage was unaffected by the irrigation treatments. The number of fruit in the MFG stage increased slightly with increasing water quantities. Average fruit size in the MFG stage decreased with increasing the number of fruit per tree, indicating that the number of fruit rather than irrigation regime is the main determinant of the final fruit size. The number of fruit per tree in the FFG stage was unaffected by the lowest irrigation treatment; however, the same treatment had the lowest fruit size, significant only in 2013. Post-harvest shoot growth in the FFG stage experiment increased with irrigation level (significant in 2013), indicating that water stress in the FFG stage had a carryover effect. The crop yield in the PH stage increased with increasing irrigation rate in the former season, significant in 2011 and 2013. The higher yields in the high irrigation treatments in the PH stage were associated with larger fruit size. The number of post-harvest vegetative flashes increased with increasing crop coefficient (K c) in the PH stage in the same season, except for the 2011. Crop yield in the PH stage increased with increasing number of post-harvest vegetative flashes in the former season. The results obtained in the current study indicate that the mango in Israel is sensitive to deficit irrigation in both the FFG in an “ON” season and in the PH stage towards an “ON” season.

References

  1. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1988) Crop evapotranspiration (guidelines for computing crop water requirements), FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Pap. Nº 56. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  2. Azzouz S, El-Nokrashyand MA (1977) Effect of frequency of irrigation on tree production and fruit quality of mango. Agric Res Rev 55(3):59–66Google Scholar
  3. Bally ISE (2006) Mangifera indica (mango). In: Elevitch CR (ed) Species profiles for Pacific Island agroforestry, ver.3.1. Permanent Agriculture Resources, Hawaii, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  4. Beutel JA (1964) Soil moisture, weather and fruit growth. Calif Citrog 49:372Google Scholar
  5. Boland AM, Mitchell PD, Jerie RH (1993) Effect of saline water combined with restricted irrigation on peach tree growth and water use. Aust J Agric Res 44:799–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brun C, Raese JT, Stahly EA (1985a) Seasonal responses of ‘Anjou’ pear trees to different irrigation regimes. I. Soil moisture, water relations, tree and fruit growth. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110:830–834Google Scholar
  7. Brun C, Raese JT, Stahly EA (1985b) Seasonal responses of ‘Anjou’ pear trees to different irrigation regimes. I. Mineral composition of fruit and leaves, fruit disorders and fruit set. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110:835–840Google Scholar
  8. Caspari HW, Behboudian MH, Chalmers DJ (1994) Water use, growth and fruit yield of ‘Hosui’ Asian pears under deficit irrigation. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119:383–388Google Scholar
  9. Chalmers DJ, Burge G, Jerie PH, Mitchell PD (1986) The mechanism of regulation of ‘Bartlett’ pear fruit and vegetative growth by irrigation withholding and regulated deficit irrigation. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 111:904–907Google Scholar
  10. Chowdhary JM, Rudra P (1971) Physiological studies on chemical control of growth and flowering in mango (Mangifera indica). In: Palanichamy V, Mitra B, Saleh AM, Sankar PD (eds) Studies on fruit–bud differentiation in mango (Mangifera indica) (2011). Res Plant Biol 1:55–67Google Scholar
  11. de Azevedo PV, da Silva BB, da Silva VPR (2003) Water requirements of irrigated mango orchards in northeast Brazil. Agric Water Manage 58:241–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper N833, RomeGoogle Scholar
  13. Downton WJS, Grant WJG, Loveys BR (1987) Diurnal changes in the photosynthesis of field-grown grape vines. New Phytol 105:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fereres E, Soriano A (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58:147–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Tejero I, Romero-Vicente R, Jiménez-Bocanegra JA, Martínez-García G, Durán-Zuazo VH, Muriel-Fernández JL (2010) Response of citrus trees to deficit irrigation during different phenological periods in relation to yield, fruit quality, and water productivity. Agric Water Manag 97:689–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ginestar C, Castel JR (1996) Response of young ‘Clementine’ citrus trees to water stress during different phenological periods. J Hortic Sci 71:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Girona J (1989) Physiological, growth and production responses of late maturing peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) to controlled deficit irrigation. MS thesis. Univ. Calif. DavisGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaser RE (1983) Bartlett’s test of homogeneity of variances. In: Kotz S, Johnson NL (eds) Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Wiley, New York, pp 189–191Google Scholar
  19. Hansen P (1971) The effect of fruiting upon transpiration rate and stomatal opening in apple leaves. Physiol Plant 25:181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Irving DE, Drost JH (1987) Effects of water deficit on vegetative growth, fruit growth and fruit quality in Cox’s Orange Pippin apple. J Hort Sci 62:427–432Google Scholar
  21. Johnson RS, Handley DF, DeJong TM (1992) Long-term response of early maturing peach trees to postharvest water deficits. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117:881–886Google Scholar
  22. Jury WA, Vaux H Jr (2005) The role of science in solving the world’s emerging water problems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15715–15720CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kadman A, Gazit S (1984) The problem of iron deficiency in mango trees and experiments to cure it in Israel. J Plant Nutr 7:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck Ch, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15(3):259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Larson KD, DeJong TM, Johnson RS (1988) Physiological and growth responses of mature peach trees to postharvest water stress. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 113:296–300Google Scholar
  26. Léchaudel M, Joas J, Caro Y, Genard M, Jannoyer M (2005) Leaf:fruit ratio and irrigation supply affect seasonal changes in minerals, organic acids and sugars of mango fruit. Food Agric 85:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lenz F (1986) Fruit effects on transpiration and dry matter production in apples, pp 101–104. In: Lakso AN, Lenz F (eds) Regulation of photosynthesis in fruit trees. N.Y. State Agr. Expt. Sta., Geneva, Symp. Proc. Publicstion, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  28. Li SH, Huguet JG, Schoch PG, Orlando P (1989) Response of peach tree growth and cropping to soil water deficit at various phenological stages of fruit development. J Hortic Sci 64:541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loveys BR, Kriedemann PE (1974) Internal control of stomatal physiology and photosynthesis. I. Stomatal regulation and associated changes in endogenous levels of abscisic and phaseic acids. Austral J Plant Physiol 1:407–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marloth RH (1947) The mango in South Africa. Farm S Afr 22(25):457–463Google Scholar
  31. Marsal J, Rapoport HF, Manrique T, Girona J (2000) Pear fruit growth under regulated deficit irrigation in container-grown trees. Scientia Hort 85:243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitchell PD, Jerie PH, Chalmers DJ (1984) The effect of regulated water deficits on pear tree growth, flowering, fruit growth and yield. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 109:15–19Google Scholar
  33. Mitchell PD, Chalmers DJ, Jerie PH, Burge G (1986) The use of initial withholding of irrigation and tree spacing to enhance the effect of regulated deficit irrigation on pear trees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 111:858–861Google Scholar
  34. Mitchell PD, van den Ende B, Jerie PH, Chalmers DJ (1989) Responses of ‘Bartlett’ pear to withholding irrigation, regulated deficit irrigation, and tree spacing. J Am Soc Hort Sci 114:15–19Google Scholar
  35. Mostert PG, Hoffman JE (1997) Water requirements and irrigation of mature mango trees. V Int Mango Symp Acta Hortic 455:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nail KC, Rao NM (1942) Some factors governing fruit-bud formation in mangoes (Mangifera indica L.). II. Relation between growth and fruiting. In: Palanichamy V, Mitra B, Saleh AM, Sankar PD (2011) Studies on fruit–bud differentiation in mango (Mangifera indica). Res Plant Biol 1:55–67Google Scholar
  37. Naor A (2006) Irrigation scheduling and evaluation of tree water status in deciduous orchards. Hortic Rev 32:111–166Google Scholar
  38. Naor A, Naschitz S, Peres M, Gal Y (2008) Responses of apple fruit size to tree water status and crop load. Tree Physiol 28:1255–1261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Naor A, Schneider D, Ben-Gal A, Zipori I, Dag A, Kerem Z, Birger R, Peres M, Gal Y (2013) The effects of crop load and irrigation rate in the oil accumulation stage on oil yield and water relations of Koroneiki’ olives. Irrig Sci 31:781–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pavel EW, Villiers AJD (2004) Responses of mango trees to reduced irrigation regimes. Acta Hortic 646:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pérez-Pérez JG, Robles JM, Botía P (2009) Influence of deficit irrigation in phase III of fruit growth on fruit quality in ‘Lane Late’ sweet orange. Agric Water Manag 96:969–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ram S, Sirohi SC, Rathore VS (1983) Naturally occurring Cytokinins in mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits. Aust J Plant Physiol 10:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romero P, Navarro JM, Pérez-Pérez JG, García-Sánchez F, Gómez- Gómez A, Porras I, Martínez V, Botía P (2006) Deficit irrigation and rootstock: their effects on water relations, vegetative development, yield, fruit quality and mineral nutrition of Clemenules mandarin. Tree Physiol 26:1537–1548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Schaffer B (2006) Effects of soil oxygen deficiency on avocado (Persea Americana L.) trees. Seminario International: Manejo del Riego y Suelo en el Cultivo del Palto La Cruz. Chile—27 y 28 de Septiembre de 2006Google Scholar
  45. Schaffer B, Whiley AW, Crane JH (1994) Mango. In: Schaffer B, Andersen PC (eds) CRC handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops, subtropical and tropical crops. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 165–197Google Scholar
  46. Silber A, Israeli Y, Levi M, Keinan A, Shapira O, Chudi G, Golan A, Noy M, Levkovitch I, Assouline S (2012) Response of ‘Hass’ avocado trees to irrigation management and root constraint. Agric Water Manage 104:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simmons SL, Hofman PJ, Whiley AW, Hetherington SE (1998) Effects of leaf to fruit ratios on fruit growth, mineral concentration and quality of mango (Mangifera indica L cv Kensington Pride). J Hort Sci Biotechnol 73:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh L, Khan AA (1940) Forcing mango trees to bear regulary. In: Palanichamy V, Mitra B, Saleh AM, Sankar PD (2011) Studies on fruit–bud differentiation in mango (Mangifera indica). Res Plant Biol 1:55–67Google Scholar
  49. Spreer W, Nagle M, Neidhart S, Carle R, Ongprasert S, Müller J (2007) Effect of regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying on the quality of mango fruits (Mangifera indica L., cv. ‘Chok Anan’). Agric Water Manag 88:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spreer W, Hegele M, Müller J, Ongprasert S (2009a) Effect of deficit irrigation on fruit growth and yield of mango (Mangifera indica L.) in Northern Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Mango Symposium. Acta Hortic 820:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spreer W, Ongprasert S, Hegele M, Wünsche JN, Müller J (2009b) Yield and fruit development in mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Chok Anan) under different irrigation regimes. Agric Water Manag 96:574–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Subramanyam H, Krishnamurthy S, Parpia HAB (1975) Physiology and biochemistry of mango fruit. Adv Food Res 21:223–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tahir FM, Ibrahim M, Kamran H (2003) Effect of drought stress on vegetative and reproductive growth behavior of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Asian J Plant Sci 2(1):116–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tharanathan RN, Yashoda HM, Prabha TN (2006) Mango (Mangifera indica L.), “the king of fruits”—an overview. Food Rev Int 22(2):95–123. doi: 10.1080/87559120600574493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Valmayor RV (1962) The mango. Univ. of the Philippines, Laguna PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  56. Welch BL (1951) On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach. Biometrika 38:330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williamson JG, Coston DC (1990) Planting method and irrigation rate influence vegetative and reproductive growth of peach planted at high density. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:207–212Google Scholar
  58. Young TW, Sauls JW (1981) The mango Industry in Florida. Fla Coop. Ext. Ser. Univ. of Florida/IFAS, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  59. Zuazo VHD, Rodríguez PCR, Franco TD (2011) Impact of sustained-deficit irrigation on tree growth, mineral nutrition, fruit yield and quality of mango in Spain. Fruits 66:257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zude M, Ebert G, Lüdders P (1998) Influence of flooding on growth and gas exchange of mango rootstocks (Mangifera indica L.) and proposed selection criteria for flood tolerance. J Exp Bot 72(3/4):148–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Levin
    • 1
  • M. Peres
    • 1
  • M. Noy
    • 2
  • C. Love
    • 2
  • Y. Gal
    • 2
  • A. Naor
    • 3
  1. 1.Northern R&D, MigalGalilee Technology CenterKiryat’shmonaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Extension ServicesBeit DaganIsrael
  3. 3.The Shamir Research InstituteUniversity of HaifaKatzrinIsrael

Personalised recommendations