Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary on the Article "(In)comparability of Carotid Artery Stent Characteristics: A Systematic Review on Assessment and Comparison with Manufacturer Data"

  • Commentary
  • Commentary
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. de Vries EE, Kök M, Hoving AM. (In)comparability of carotid artery stent characteristics: a systematic review on assessment and comparison with manufacturer data. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02499-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wissgott C, Schmidt W, Brandt-Wunderlich C, et al. Clinical results and mechanical properties of the carotid CGUARD double-layered embolic prevention stent. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bosiers, et al. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(2):133–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nikas D, et al. Update on new stents and protection devices for carotid artery stenting: what we know, what we learnt recently and what we need to know. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;58(1):13–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not supported by any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / Neuroradiology, Academic Hospitals Flensburg, Flensburg, Germany

    Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck

Authors
  1. Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Müller-Hülsbeck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

SMH has received speaker fees and financial funding related to clinical trials from Terumo, BSC, Eurocor.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müller-Hülsbeck, S. Commentary on the Article "(In)comparability of Carotid Artery Stent Characteristics: A Systematic Review on Assessment and Comparison with Manufacturer Data". Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 43, 1438–1439 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02543-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02543-0

Search

Navigation