Advertisement

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 41, Issue 9, pp 1451–1452 | Cite as

Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval: A National Survey of Current Practice

  • Permesh Singh Dhillon
  • Said Habib
Letter to the Editor
  • 83 Downloads

To the Editor,

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are recommended in patients with extensive lower extremity thromboembolism with contraindications to anticoagulation, including visceral bleeding, trauma, elective surgery and pregnancy. There is an increase in the complication rates on attempted filter retrieval beyond the recommended time frame of indwelling filters, which include failure of retrieval, device infection, IVC filter fracture and migration, thrombus formation, and IVC occlusion and perforation [1]. Hence, the British Society of Radiologists (BSIR) and United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) have issued guidelines that recommend retrieval of temporary IVC filters in all patients within 9 weeks [2]. However, there is global evidence of poor temporary IVC retrieval rates, with means ranging from as low as 8 to 45% [1]. The main recurring causes remain poor patient follow-up following IVC filter insertion, lack of awareness and education amongst the referring...

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest or any disclosures to declare.

Human and Animal Rights

This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Tao MJ, Montbriand JM, Eisenberg N, Sniderman KW, Roche-Nagle G. Temporary inferior vena cava filter indications, retrieval rates, and follow-up management at a multicenter tertiary care institution. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(2):430–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uberoi R, Tapping CR, Chalmers N, Allgar V. British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR) Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Filter Registry. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36:1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang SL, Cha HHA, Lin JR, Francis B, Elizabeth W, Martin P, et al. Impact of physician education and a dedicated inferior vena cava filter tracking system on inferior vena cava filter use and retrieval rates across a large US health care region. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(5):740–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Minocha J, Idakoji I, Riaz A, Karp J, Gupta R, Chrisman HB, et al. Improving inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates: impact of a dedicated inferior vena cava filter clinic. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(12):1847–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klinken S, Humphries C, Ferguson J. Establishment of an inferior vena cava filter database and interventional radiology led follow-up—retrieval rates and patients lost to follow-up. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(5):630–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interventional Radiology, Radiology Department, Queen’s Medical CentreNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Radiological Sciences, Queen’s Medical CentreUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations