Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to assess the technical success rate and adverse events (AEs) associated with computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous gastrostomy for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study included patients with HNC who had undergone CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy between February 2007 and December 2013. Information regarding the patients’ backgrounds, CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy techniques, technical success rate, and AEs were obtained from the medical records. In all patients, the stomach was punctured under CT fluoroscopy with a Funada gastropexy device.
Results
During the study period, 177 patients underwent CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy. The most common tumor location was the oral cavity, followed by the pharynx and maxilla. The indication for CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy were tumor obstruction in 78 patients, postoperative dysphagia in 55 patients, radiation edema in 43 patients, and cerebral infarction in 1 patient. The technical success rate was 97.7 %. The overall mean procedure time was 25.3 min. Major AEs occurred in seven patients (4.0 %), including bleeding (n = 4), colonic injury (n = 1), gastric tear (n = 1), and aspiration pneumonia (n = 1). Minor AEs occurred in 15 patients (8.5 %), which included peristomal leakage (n = 6), irritation (n = 4), inadvertent removal (n = 2), peristomal hemorrhage (n = 1), peristomal infection (n = 1), and wound granulation (n = 1). The mean follow-up period was 111 days (range 1–1106 days).
Conclusion
Our study suggests that CT-guided gastrostomy may be suitable in patients with HNC.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hunter KU, Jolly S. Clinical review of physical activity and functional considerations in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:1475–9.
Salas S, Baumstarck-Barrau K, Alfonsi M, Digue L, Bagarry D, Feham N, et al. Impact of the prophylactic gastrostomy for unresectable squamous cell head and neck carcinomas treated with radio-chemotherapy on quality of life: prospective randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 2009;93:503–9.
Gauderer MWL, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:872–5.
Preshaw RM. A percutaneous method for inserting a feeding gastrostomy tube. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981;152:658–60.
Levin DC, Matteucci T. “Turf battles” over imaging and interventional procedures in community hospitals: survey results. Radiology. 1990;176:321–4.
Wollman B, D’Agostino HB. Percutaneous radiologic and endoscopic gastrostomy: a 3-year institutional analysis of procedure performance. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169:1551–3.
Vingan HL. Percutaneous gastrostomy: a radiological alternative? Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:2247–8.
Preyer S, Thull P. Gastric metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: report of a case. Endoscopy. 1989;21:295.
Meurer MF, Kenady DE. Metastatic head and neck carcinoma in a percutaneous gastrostomy site. Head Neck. 1993;15:70–3.
Cruz I, Mamel JJ, Brady PG, Cass-Garcia M. Incidence of abdominal wall metastasis complicating PEG tube placement in untreated head and neck cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:708–11.
Gottschalk A, Strotzer M, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, Seitz J, Völk M. CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy: success rate, early and late complications. Rofo. 2007;179:387–95.
Teichgräber UK, Streitparth F, Cho CH, Gebauer B, Ricke J, Benter T. Percutaneous push-through gastrostomy by applying a CT-guided gastropexy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:1149–52.
Myssiorek D, Siegel D, Vambutas A. Fluoroscopically placed percutaneous gastrostomies in the head and neck patient. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1557–60.
Deurloo EE, Schultze Kool LJ, Kröger R, van Coevorden F, Balm AJ. Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27:94–7.
Heberlein WE, Goodwin WJ, Wood CE, Yousaf M, Culp WC. Gastrostomy tube placement without nasogastric tube: a retrospective evaluation in 85 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:1433–8.
Silas AM, Pearce LF, Lestina LS, Grove MR, Tosteson A, Manganiello WD, et al. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a comparison of indications, complications and outcomes in 370 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2005;56:84–90.
Grant DG, Bradley PT, Pothier DD, Bailey D, Cadera S, Baldwin DL, et al. Complications following gastrostomy tube insertion in patients with head and neck cancer: a prospective multi-institution study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34:103–12.
Carlson SK, Bender CE, Classic KL, Zink FE, Quam JP, Ward EM, et al. Benefits and safety of CT fluoroscopy in interventional radiologic procedures. Radiology. 2001;219:515–20.
Sanchez RB, vanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino HB, Goodacre BW, Moyers P, Casola G. CT guidance for percutaneous gastrostomy and gastroenterostomy. Radiology. 1992;184:201–5.
Miller RE, Castlemain B, Lacqua FJ, Kotler DP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature. Surg Endosc. 1989;3:186–90.
de Bucourt M, Collettini F, Althoff C, Streitparth F, Greupner J, Hamm B, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous gastrostomy with loop gastropexy and peel-away sheath trocar technique in 31 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:285–91.
Covarrubias DA, O’Connor OJ, McDermott S, Arellano RS. Radiologic percutaneous gastrostomy: review of potential complications and approach to managing the unexpected outcome. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:921–31.
Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Sato Y, Kashima M, Kato M, Inoue D, et al. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy in patients with malignant pharyngoesophageal obstruction. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013;43:713–8.
Given MF, Hanson JJ, Lee MJ. Interventional radiology techniques for provision of enteral feeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2005;28:692–703.
Mildenberger P, Oberholzer K, Kauczor HU, Düber C, Kurz S, Schild H, et al. Radiologically assisted percutaneous gastro-/enterostomy–a retrospective analysis of 90 procedures. Rofo. 1996;165:74–9.
Magné N, Marcy PY, Foa C, Falewee MN, Schneider M, Demard F, et al. Comparison between nasogastric tube feeding and percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258:89–92.
Sarti M, Brehmer WP, Gay SB. Low-dose techniques in CT-guided interventions. Radiographics. 2012;32:1109–19.
Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology. 1999;212:673–81.
Lucey BC, Varghese JC, Hochberg A, Blake MA, Soto JA. CT-guided intervention with low radiation dose: feasibility and experience. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1187–94.
Collure DW, Bumpers HL, Hoover EL. A complication of T-fasteners in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:938–9.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Department of Otolaryngology, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, and Nutrition Support Team at Iwate Medical University. We also wish to thank Ms. Nozomi Numakunai for providing the illustrations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
No additional consent was obtained for the retrospective analysis of the clinical records.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tamura, A., Kato, K., Suzuki, M. et al. CT-Guided Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Retrospective Evaluation in 177 Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 39, 271–278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1170-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1170-8