Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive Assessment of Surgeons During Surgical Procedures: Influence of Time and Intraoperative Complications

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Surgeon’s performance may be influenced by several factors that may affect skills and judgement, which ultimately represents surgeon´s cognition. Cognition refers to all forms of knowing and awareness, such as perceiving, conceiving, remembering, reasoning, judging, imagining, and problem solving. This report aims to evaluate the effect of operative time and operative complications on surgeon´s cognition.

Methods

Forty-six surgeons (mean age 31 years, 78% males) assigned to an operation expected to last for at least 2 h, volunteered for the study. All participants underwent 3 cognitive tests at the beginning of the operation and hourly, until the end of the procedure: (a) concentration (serial sevens, counting down from 100 by sevens); (b) visual (fast counting, counting the number of circles with the same color among a series of circles); and (c) motor (trail making, connecting a set of numbered dots). Intraoperative complications were recorded.

Results

The visual test had a stable behavior along time. Concentration and motor tests tend to be performed faster. Intraoperative complications occurred in 5 (11%) cases (3 hemorrhage and 2 organ injuries). Performance time was stable for concentration and motor tests but visual test tends to be performed faster in cases with an intraoperative complication.

Conclusion

Our results showed that (1) time does not jeopardize surgeons’ cognition, but rather surgeons learned to perform the tests faster, and (2) complications do not decrease surgeons’ cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Psychological Association. Dictionary of Psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/cognition. Accessed 6 Dec 2018

  2. Parker RS, Parker P (2017) The impact of sleep deprivation in military surgical teams: a systematic review. J R Army Med Corps 163(3):158–163. https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2016-000640 (Epub 2016 Sep 13)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Perioperative Care (2016) Statement on distractions in the operating room. Bull Am Coll Surg 101(10):42–44

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mentis HM, Chellali A, Manser K, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2016) A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training. Surg Endosc 30(5):1713–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4443-z (Epub 2015 Jul 21)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Belykh E, Onaka NR, Abramov IT, Yağmurlu K, Byvaltsev VA, Spetzler RF, Nakaj P, Preul MC (2018) Systematic review of factors influencing surgical performance: practical recommendations for microsurgical procedures in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 112:e182–e207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tombaugh TN (2004) Trail making test A and B: normative data stratified by age and education. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 19(2):203–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenthal R, Hoffmann H, Clavien PA, Bucher HC, Dell-Kuster S (2015) Definition and classification of intraoperative complications (CLASSIC): Delphi study and pilot evaluation. World J Surg 39(7):1663–1671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3003-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dholakia S, Jeans JP, Khalid U, Dholakia S, D’Souza C, Nemeth K (2015) The association of noise and surgical-site infection in day-case hernia repairs. Surgery 157(6):1153–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.026 (Epub 2015 Feb 28)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moris DN, Linos D (2013) Music meets surgery: two sides to the art of “healing”. Surg Endosc 27(3):719–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2525-8 (Epub 2012 Oct 6)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel F, Kapoula Z (2016) Binocular vision and the stroop test. Optom Vis Sci 93(2):194–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehmann KS, Martus P, Little-Elk S, Maass H, Holmer C, Zurbuchen U, Bretthauer G, Buhr HJ, Ritz JP (2010) Impact of sleep deprivation on medium-term psychomotor and cognitive performance of surgeons: prospective cross-over study with a virtual surgery simulator and psychometric tests. Surgery 147(2):246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mentis HM, Chellali A, Manser K, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2016) A systematic review of the effect of distraction on surgeon performance: directions for operating room policy and surgical training. Surg Endosc 30(5):1713–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4443-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manning RT (1982) The serial sevens test. Arch Intern Med 142(6):1192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bowie CR, Harvey PD (2006) Administration and interpretation of the trail making test. Nat Protoc 1(5):2277–2281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park AE, Zahiri HR, Hallbeck MS, Augenstein V, Sutton E, Yu D, Lowndes BR, Bingener J (2017) Intraoperative, “Micro Breaks” with targeted stretching enhance surgeon physical function and mental focus: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg 265(2):340–346. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Engelmann C, Schneider M, Kirschbaum C, Grote G, Dingemann J, Schoof S, Ure BM (2011) Effects of intraoperative breaks on mental and somatic operator fatigue: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 25(4):1245–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1350-1 (Epub 2010 Sep 11)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stucky CH, Cromwell KD, Voss RK, Chiang YJ, Woodman K, Lee JE, Cormier JN (2018) Surgeon symptoms, strain, and selections: systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 27:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2017.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Slack PS, Coulson CJ, Ma X, Webster K, Proops DW (2008) The effect of operating time on surgeons’ muscular fatigue. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(8):651–657. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588408X321710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rieger A, Fenger S, Neubert S, Weippert M, Kreuzfeld S, Stoll R (2015) Psychophysical workload in the operating room: primary surgeon versus assistant. Surg Endosc 29(7):1990–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3899-6 (Epub 2014 Oct 11)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keshavarz Panahi A, Cho S (2016) Prediction of muscle fatigue during minimally invasive surgery using recurrence quantification analysis. Minim Invasive Surg 2016:5624630. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5624630 (Epub 2016 May 24)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Browne BJ, Van Susteren T, Onsager DR, Simpson D, Salaymeh B, Condon RE (1994) Influence of sleep deprivation on learning among surgical house staff and medical students. Surgery 115(5):604–610

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goldenberg MG, Fok KH, Ordon M, Pace KT, Lee JY (2017) Simulation-based laparoscopic surgery crisis resource management training-predicting technical and nontechnical skills. J Surg Educ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Waddimba AC, Scribani M, Hasbrouck MA, Krupa N, Jenkins P, May JJ (2016) Resilience among employed physicians and mid-level practitioners in upstate New York. Health Serv Res 51(5):1706–1734. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12499

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vickers SM, Vickers AL (2017) Lessons learned from mentors and heroes on leadership and surgical resilience. J Gastrointest Surg 21(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3257-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kurek SJ Jr (2016) EAST 2016 presidential address: resilience. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Minter RM (2018) Passion, integrity, resilience: core values to carry us forward 2017 Society of University Surgeons presidential address. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.12.006. (Epub ahead of print)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JB contributed to protocol/project development; data collection or management; data analysis; and manuscript writing/editing. FAMH involved in protocol/project development; data collection or management; data analysis; and manuscript writing/editing. FS and MGP performed manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernando A. M. Herbella.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beneduzzi, J., Herbella, F.A.M., Schlottmann, F. et al. Cognitive Assessment of Surgeons During Surgical Procedures: Influence of Time and Intraoperative Complications. World J Surg 43, 143–148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4764-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4764-x

Navigation