Application of the AAST EGS Grade for Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction to a Multi-national Patient Population
- 15 Downloads
The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) anatomic severity grading system for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) has demonstrated to be a valid tool in North American patient populations. Using a multi-national patient cohort, we retrospectively assessed the validity the AAST ASBO grading system and estimated disease severity in a global population in order to correlate with several key clinical outcomes.
Multicenter retrospective review during 2012–2016 from four centers, Minnesota USA, Bologna Italy, Pietermaritzburg South Africa, and Bucharest Romania, was performed. Adult patients (age ≥ 18) with ASBO were identified. Baseline demographics, physiologic parameters, laboratory results, operative and imaging details, outcomes were collected. AAST ASBO grades were assigned by independent reviewers. Univariate and multivariable analyses with odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed.
There were 789 patients with a median [IQR] age of 58 [40–75] years; 47% were female. The AAST ASBO grades were I (n = 180, 23%), II (n = 443, 56%), III (n = 87, 11%), and IV (n = 79, 10%). Successful non-operative management was 58%. Conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 33%. Overall mortality and complication and temporary abdominal closure rates were 2, 46, and 4.7%, respectively. On regression, independent predictors for mortality included grade III (OR 4.4 95%CI 1.1–7.3), grade IV (OR 7.4 95%CI 1.7–9.4), pneumonia (OR 5.6 95%CI 1.4–11.3), and failing non-operative management (OR 2.4 95%CI 1.3–6.7).
The AAST EGS grade can be assigned with ease at any surgical facility using operative or imaging findings. The AAST ASBO severity grading system has predictive validity for important clinical outcomes and allows for standardization across institutions, providers, and future research. Disease severity and outcomes varied between countries.
Level of evidence III
Study type Retrospective multi-institutional cohort study.
MCH, AB, JLB, JJPB, VYK, MB, JMA, IN, DLC, SDS, MDZ all provided substantial contributions to conception and design, or acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data as well as drafting/revision of the article for critically important intellectual content. All authors have provided final approval of this version of the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
- 7.Zielinski MD, Haddad NN, Cullinane DC et al (2017) Multi-institutional, prospective, observational study comparing the Gastrografin challenge versus standard treatment in adhesive small bowel obstruction. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 83(1):47–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001499 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Utter GH, Miller PR, Mowery NT et al (2015) ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM mapping of the AAST emergency general surgery disease severity grading systems: conceptual approach, limitations, and recommendations for the future. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 78(5):1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000608 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Branco BC, Barmparas G, Schnüriger B, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic and therapeutic role of water-soluble contrast agent in adhesive small bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 97(4):470–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7019 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Hernandez M, Aho JM, Habermann EB, Choudhry A, Morris D, Zielinski M (2016) Increased anatomic severity predicts outcomes: validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma’s emergency general surgery score in appendicitis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001274 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar