Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 11, pp 3501–3507 | Cite as

Affordable Laparoscopic Camera System (ALCS) Designed for Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Feasibility Study

  • Federico GhezaEmail author
  • Fadekemi O. Oginni
  • Simone Crivellaro
  • Mario A. Masrur
  • Adewale O. Adisa
Original Scientific Report
  • 306 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Minimally invasive surgical techniques (MISTs) could have tremendous benefits in resource-poor environment. There is growing interest in MISTs in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), but its adoption has remained limited; this is largely due to high cost of the initial setup, lack of technological backup and limited access to training among others. An affordable laparoscopic setup will go a long way in improving access to MISTs.

Methods

A common zero degrees 10 mm scope is attached on the camera of a low-price smartphone. Two elastic bands are used to fix the scope right in front of the smartphone’s main camera; alternatively, a low-cost camera coupler can be used. The device is covered with sterile transparent drapes and a light source connected with a fiber-optic cable for endoscopic use. The image can be seen in real time on a common TV screen through an HDMI connection to the smartphone, with a sterile drape.

Results

We were able to perform the five tasks of the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery curriculum, using our vision system with proficiency. In a pig model, we performed a tubal ligation to simulate an appendectomy and we were able to suture. No major differences were measured between the two connection systems.

Conclusions

A low-cost laparoscopic camera system can benefit surgeons and trainees in LMICs. The system is already attractive for use during training, but further studies are needed to evaluate its potential clinical role in LMICs.

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Hernandez MC, Finnesgaard E, Aho JM et al (2017) Appendicitis: rural patient status is associated with increased duration of prehospital symptoms and worse outcomes in high- and low-middle-income countries. World J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4344-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chao TE, Mandigo M, Opoku-Anane J et al (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc 30:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adisa AO, Alatise OI, Arowolo OA et al (2012) Laparoscopic appendectomy in a Nigerian teaching hospital. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 16:576–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ekwunife CN, Nwobe O (2014) First 100 laparoscopic surgeries in a predominantly rural Nigerian population: a template for future growth. World J Surg 38:2813–2817.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2656-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adisa AO, Lawal OO, Adesunkanmi AR et al (2014) Impact of introduction of laparoscopic surgery on management of unresolved intra-abdominal malignancies in a West African hospital. World J Surg 38:2519–2524.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2618-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mutabdzic D, Bedada AG, Bakanisi B et al (2014) Designing a contextually appropriate surgical training program in low-resource settings: the Botswana experience. World J Surg 37:1486–1491.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1731-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bedada AG, Hsiao M, Bakanisi B et al (2015) Establishing a contextually appropriate laparoscopic program in resource-restricted environments: experience in Botswana. Ann Surg 261:807–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choy I, Kitto S, Adu-Aryee N et al (2013) Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic surgery in a lower-middle-income country. Surg Endosc 27:4009–4015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gosselin RA, Gyamfi YA, Contini S (2011) Challenges of meeting surgical needs in the developing world. World J Surg 35:258–261.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0863-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beard JH, Akoko L, Mwanga A et al (2014) Manual laparoscopic skills development using a low-cost trainer box in Tanzania. J Surg Educ 71:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andreatta P, Perosky J, Klotz J et al (2014) Pilot study outcomes from a resource-limited setting for a low-cost training program for laparoscopic surgical skills. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 125:186–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adisa AO, Lawal OO, Arowolo OA et al (2013) Local adaptations aid establishment of laparoscopic surgery in a semiurban Nigerian hospital. Surg Endosc 27:390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Long KL, Spears C, Kenady DE et al (2014) Implementation of a low-cost laparoscopic skills curriculum in a third-world setting. J Surg Educ 71:860–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fils J, Bhashyam AR, Pierre Pierre JB et al (2015) Short-term performance improvement of a continuing medical education program in a low-income country. World J Surg 39:2407–2412.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3145-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tansley G, Bailey JG, Gu Y et al (2016) Efficacy of surgical simulation training in a low-income country. World J Surg 40:2643–2649.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3573-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCullough M, Campbell A, Siu A et al (2017) Competency-based education in low resource settings: development of a novel surgical training program. World J Surg.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4205-2 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mobolaji O, Fiemu N, Akanmu I et al (2013) Pathway to independence: implications for developing a sustainable MIS program in low resource settings. Niger Q J Hosp Med 23:309–313Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li MM, George J (2017) A systematic review of low-cost laparoscopic simulators. Surg Endosc 31:38–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen X, Pan J, Chen J et al (2016) A novel portable foldable laparoscopic trainer for surgical education. J Surg Educ 73:185–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee M, Savage J, Dias M et al (2015) Box, cable and smartphone: a simple laparoscopic trainer. Clin Teach 12:384–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wong J, Bhattacharya G, Vance SJ et al (2013) Construction and validation of a low-cost laparoscopic simulator for surgical education. J Surg Educ 70:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dutta R, Yoon R, Patel RM et al (2017) Clinical comparison of conventional and mobile endockscope videocystoscopy using an air or fluid medium. J Endourol 31:593–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mistry N, Coulson C, George A (2017) Endoscope-i: an innovation in mobile endoscopic technology transforming the delivery of patient care in otolaryngology. Expert Rev Med Devices 14:913–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sohn W, Shreim S, Yoon R et al (2013) Endockscope: using mobile technology to create global point of service endoscopy. J Endourol 27:1154–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Perez Escamirosa F, Ordorica Flores R, Minor Martinez A (2015) Construction and validation of a low-cost surgical trainer based on iPhone technology for training laparoscopic skills. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 25:e78–e82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lu MK, Chang FC, Wang WZ et al (2014) Compact light-emitting diode lighting ring for video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Biomed Opt 19:105004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Clancy NT, Clark J, Noonan DP et al (2012) Light sources for single-access surgery. Surg Innov 19:134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eskander MF, Neuwirth MG, Kuy S et al (2016) Technology for teaching: new tools for 21st century surgeons. Bull Am Coll Surg 101:36–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mukund Bahadur KC, Murray PJ (2010) Cell phone short messaging service (SMS) for HIV/AIDS in South Africa: a literature review. Stud Health Technol Inform 160:530–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vodopivec-Jamsek V, de Jongh T, Gurol-Urganci I et al (2012) Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD007457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lund S, Nielsen BB, Hemed M et al (2014) Mobile phones improve antenatal care attendance in Zanzibar: a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.College of Health SciencesObafemi Awolowo UniversityIle-IfeNigeria

Personalised recommendations