Abstract
Background
Stricture is a common complication of gastrointestinal (GI) anastomoses, associated with impaired quality of life, risk of malnutrition, and further interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the association between circular stapler diameter and anastomotic stricture rates throughout the GI tract.
Methods
A systematic literature search of EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library was performed. The primary outcome was the rate of radiologically or endoscopically confirmed anastomotic stricture. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated using random-effects models to determine the effect of circular stapler diameter on stricture rates in different regions of the GI tract.
Results
Twenty-one studies were identified: seven oesophageal, twelve gastric, and three lower GI. Smaller stapler sizes were strongly associated with higher anastomotic stricture rates throughout the GI tract. The oesophageal anastomosis studies showed; 21 versus 25 mm circular stapler: OR 4.39 ([95% CI 2.12, 9.07]; P < 0.0001); 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: OR 1.71 ([95% CI 1.15, 2.53]; P < 0.008). Gastric studies showed; 21 versus 25 mm circular stapler: OR 3.12 ([95% CI 2.23, 4.36]; P < 0.00001); 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: OR 7.67 ([95% CI 1.86, 31.57]; P < 0.005). Few lower GI studies were identified, though a similar trend was found: 25 versus 28/29 mm circular stapler: pooled OR 2.61 ([95% CI 0.82, 8.29]; P = 0.100).
Conclusions
The use of larger circular stapler sizes is strongly associated with reduced risk of anastomotic stricture in the upper GI tract, though data from lower GI joins are limited.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Johansson J, Choustoulakis E et al (2004) Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg 198(4):536–541
Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW et al (1995) Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 222(2):120–127
Arye B, Michael PF, Karen MP, Sayeed I, Philip RS (2002) Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass surgery: clinical and imaging findings. Radiology 223(3):625–632
Haughn C, Calic S, Carrodeguas L, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R, Bergamaschi R (2006) Stricture rates after circular stapled versus linear stapled gastro-jejunostomy for laparoscopic gastric bypass. Eur Surg 38(6):405–410
Yimcharoen P, Heneghan H, Chand B, Talarico JA, Tariq N, Kroh M et al (2012) Successful management of gastrojejunal strictures after gastric bypass: is timing important? Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(2):151–157
Sawai RS (2012) Management of colonic obstruction: a review. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 25(4):200–203
Choy PYG, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, Parry BR, Merrie A (2011) Fitzgerald A (2003) Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 9:CD004320
Bendewald FP, Choi JN, Blythe LS, Selzer DJ, Ditslear JH, Mattar SG (2011) Comparison of hand-sewn, linear-stapled, and circular-stapled gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 21(11):1671–1675
Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA (2013) Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 257(2):238–248
Law S, Fok M, Chu K, Wong J (1997) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 226(2):169–173
Markar S, Penna M, Venkat-Ramen V, Karthikesalingam A, Hashemi M (2012) Influence of circular stapler diameter on postoperative stenosis after laparoscopic gastrojejunal anastomosis in morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(2):230–235
Fisher B, Atkinson J, Cottam D (2007) Incidence of gastroenterostomy stenosis in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using 21- or 25-mm circular stapler: a randomized prospective blinded study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 3(2):176–179
Johansson J, Zilling T, von Holstein CS, Johnsson F, Oberg S, Walther B (2000) Anastomotic diameters and strictures following esophagectomy and total gastrectomy in 256 patients. World J Surg 24(1):78–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689910015
Kirat HT, Kiran RP, Lian L, Remzi FH, Fazio VW (2010) Influence of stapler size used at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis on anastomotic leak, stricture, long-term functional outcomes, and quality of life. Am J Surg 200(1):68–72
Nguyen NT, Stevens CM, Wolfe BM (2003) Incidence and outcome of anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg 7(8):997–1003
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med 6(7):e1000097
Deeks JJ, D’Amico R, Sowden A, Sakarovitch C et al (2003) Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 7(27):iii–x
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560
Khoraki J, Funk LM, Greenberg JA, Leverson G, Campos GM (2016) The effect of route of anvil insertion on stricture rates with circular stapled gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg 26(3):517–524
Zuiki T, Hosoya Y, Kaneda Y, Kurashina K, Saito S, Ui T et al (2013) Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 27(10):3683–3689
Senapati A, Tibbs CJ, Ritchie JK, Nicholls RJ, Hawley PR (1996) Stenosis of the pouch anal anastomosis following restorative proctocolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 11(2):57–59
Kissin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA, Kark AE (1985) The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: a clinico-radiological study of 38 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67(1):20–22
Tokunaga Y, Ryo J, Kitaoka A, Yagi T, Tokuka A, Ohsumi K (1999) Jejunal pouch to avoid stricture after esophagojejunostomy with circular stapler. J Am Coll Surg 189(5):466–469
Sima E, Hedberg J, Sundbom M (2016) Gastrointestinal symptoms, weight loss and patient satisfaction 5 years after gastric bypass: a study of three techniques for the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 30(4):1553–1558
Lewis WG, Kuzu A, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D (1994) Stricture at the pouch-anal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37(2):120–125
Dresner SM, Lamb PJ, Wayman J, Hayes N, Griffin SM (2000) Benign anastomotic stricture following transthoracic subtotal oesophagectomy and stapled oesophago-gastrostomy: risk factors and management. Br J Surg 87(3):362–373
Cakabay B, Aksel B, Unal E, Bayar S, Kocaoglu H, Demirci S et al (2012) Influence of the stapler size used in esophagojejunostomy anastomosis: anastomotic leak and strictures after total gastrectomy. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 32(2):428–431
Smith C, Garren M, Gould J (2011) Impact of gastrojejunostomy diameter on long-term weight loss following laparoscopic gastric bypass: a follow-up study. Surg Endosc 25(7):2164–2167
Gould JC, Garren M, Boll V, Starling J (2006) The impact of circular stapler diameter on the incidence of gastrojejunostomy stenosis and weight loss following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc 20(7):1017–1020
Kim DH, Oh CA, Oh SJ, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS et al (2012) Circular stapler size and risk of anastomotic complications in gastroduodenostomy for gastric cancer. World J Surg 36(8):1796–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1584-2
Deldycke A, Van Daele E, Ceelen W, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P (2016) Functional outcome after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer. J Surg Oncol 113(1):24–28
Takata MC, Ciovica R, Cello JP, Posselt AM, Rogers SJ, Campos GM (2007) Predictors, treatment, and outcomes of gastrojejunostomy stricture after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 17(7):878–884
Suggs WJ, Kouli W, Lupovici M, Chau WY, Brolin RE (2007) Complications at gastrojejunostomy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: comparison between 21- and 25-mm circular staplers. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 3(5):508–514
Petrin G, Ruol A, Battaglia G, Buin F, Merigliano S, Constantini M et al (2000) Anastomotic stenoses occurring after circular stapling in esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Endosc 14(7):670–674
Berrisford RG, Page RD, Donnelly RJ (1996) Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111(1):142–146
Yendamuri S, Gutierrez L, Oni A, Mashtare T, Khushalani N, Yang G et al (2011) Does circular stapled esophagogastric anastomotic size affect the incidence of postoperative strictures? J Surg Res 165(1):1–4
Leyba J, Llopis S, Isaac J, Aulestia S, Bravo C, Obregon F (2008) Laparoscopic gastric bypass for morbid obesity-a randomized controlled trial comparing two gastrojejunal anastomosis techniques. JSLS 12(4):385–388
Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, Evans K, Inculet R, Nelems B (1992) Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg 163(5):484–489
Jex RK, van Heerden JA, Wolff BG, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM (1987) Gastrointestinal anastomoses. Factors affecting early complications. Ann Surg 206(2):138–141
Pierie JPEN, De Graaf PW, Poen H, van der Tweel I, Obertop H (1993) Incidence and management of benign anastomotic stricture after cervical oesophagogastrostomy. Br J Surg 80(4):471–474
Lessing Y, Pencovich N, Khatib M, Meron-Eldar S, Koriansky J, Abu-Abeid S (2017) One-anastomosis gastric bypass: first 407 patients in 1 year. Obes Surg 27:1–7
Castro P, Ribeiro F, Rocha A, Mazzurana M, Alvarez G (2014) Hand-sewn versus stapler esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal ressection: sistematic review and meta-analysis. ABCD Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) 27(3):216–221
Viola F, Covidien LP, Mansfield, MA (2014) Assignee. Surgical instrument with curvilinear tissue-contacting surfaces. US Patent 20130056516. 2014
Bilotti F, Pomeroy GM, Omaits TP, Csiky L, Neurohr MA, Pastorelli A, Inventors (2008) Ethicon endo-surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, OH (US), assignee. Elliptical intraluminal surgical stapler for anastomosis. US patent 7422138. 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allen, W., Wells, C.I., Greenslade, M. et al. Association Between Circular Stapler Diameter and Stricture Rates Following Gastrointestinal Anastomosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 42, 3097–3105 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4606-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4606-x