Abstract
Background
Although thoracic lymph node metastasis in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has been reported to be a negative risk factor for long-term survival, only a few studies have evaluated the clinicopathologic difference between the impact of metastasis to the paraesophageal lymph nodes and to the nonparaesophageal lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgical outcome after the clearance of metastatic thoracic lymph nodes.
Methods
Retrospectively reviewed were 164 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal SCC who had not had preoperative treatment and underwent surgery from 1980 to 2005 and were found to have thoracic lymph node metastases. Of these patients, 83 underwent surgery from 1980 to 1994 and 81 from 1995 to 2005. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of nonparaesophageal lymph node metastasis on survival.
Results
Univariate analysis revealed that T3/T4 tumors and the presence of nonparaesophageal node metastases were associated with only a 20% overall five-year survival rate. The overall five-year survival for the most recent period was significantly better than for the former period (42% vs. 13%, p < 0.01). Based on a multivariate analysis of prognostic impact of each nonparaesophageal node, the presence of metastatic subcarinal and/or posterior mediastinal nodes was an independent risk factor for reduced survival.
Conclusion
Surgical outcome for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer and metastatic thoracic lymph nodes has improved during the last 25 years. Although postoperative chemotherapy might improve survival, the presence of T3/T4 tumors and/or metastatic nonparaesophageal nodes were unfavorable factors for survival.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (eds) (2002) UICC International Union Against Cancer TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons, pp 60–64
Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K (1991) Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 48:411–420
Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, et al. (1994) Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg 220:364–373
Shimada H, Nabeya Y, Okazumi S, et al. (2006) Impact of the number and extent of positive lymph nodes in 200 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after three-field lymph node dissection. World J Surg 30:1441–1449
Japanese Esophageal Oncology Group (1993) A comparison of chemotherapy and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment to surgery for esophageal carcinoma. Chest 104:203–207
Ando N, Iizuka T, Kakegawa T, et al. (1997) A randomized trial of surgery with and without chemotherapy for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: the Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114:205–209
Ando N, Iizuka T, Ide H, et al. (2003) Surgery plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for localized squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: A Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study-JCOG9204. J Clin Oncol 24:4592-4596
Lee J, Lee KE, Im YH, et al. (2005) Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in lymph node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thoracic Surg 80:1170–1175
Bhansali MS, Fujita H, Kakegawa T, et al. (1997) Pattern of recurrence after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell carcinoma in the thoracic esophagus. World J Surg 21:275–281
Nakagawa S, Kanda T, Kosugi S, et al. (2004) Recurrence pattern of squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus after extended radical esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 198:205–211
Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease (2004) Guideline for clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, 9th ed. Preface, general principles, part I. Esophagus 1:61–88
Shimada H, Ochiai T, Okazumi S, et al. (2000) Clinical benefits of steroid therapy on surgical stress in patients with esophageal cancer. Surgery 128:791–798
Shimada H, Okazumi S, Matsubara H, et al. (2004) Effect of steroid therapy on postoperative course and survival of patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma. Esophagus 1:89–94
Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, et al. (2000) Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg 232:225–232
Law S, Kwong DL, Kwok KF, et al. (2003) Improvement in treatment results and long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer: impact of chemoradiation and change in treatment strategy. Ann Surg 238:339–348
Stein HJ, Siewert JR (2004) Improved prognosis of resected esophageal cancer. World J Surg 28:520–525
Rouvelas I, Zeng W, Lindblad M, et al. (2005) Survival after surgery for oesophageal cancer: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 6:864–870
Shimada H, Kitabayashi H, Nabeya Y, et al. (2003) Treatment response and prognosis of patients after recurrence of esophageal cancer. Surgery 133:24–31
Igaki H, Kato H, Tachimori Y, et al. (2003) Prognostic evaluation of patients with clinical T1 and T2 squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus after 3-field lymph node dissection. Surgery 133:368–374
Matsubara T, Ueda M, Abe T, et al. (1999) Unique distribution patterns of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with superficial carcinoma of the thoracic oesophagus. Br J Surg 86:669–673
Shimada H, Nabeya Y, Matsubara H, et al. (2006) Prediction of lymph node status in patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 160 surgically resected cancers. Am J Surg 191:250–254
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan (21st Century Center of Excellence Program).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shimada, H., Okazumi, Si., Matsubara, H. et al. Long-term Results after Dissection of Positive Thoracic Lymph Nodes in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. World J Surg 32, 255–261 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9213-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9213-1