Abstract
Contemporary forest management often requires meeting diverse ecological objectives including maintaining ecosystem function and promoting biodiversity through timber harvesting. Wildlife are essential in this process by providing ecological services that can facilitate forest resiliency in response to timber harvesting. However, the mechanisms driving species’ responses remain ambiguous. The goal of this study was to assess mechanisms influencing eastern red-backed salamander (RBS; Plethodon cinereus) response to overstory cover removal. We evaluated two mitigation strategies for the RBS in response to overstory removal. We used a before-after-control-impact design to study how (1) retaining residual trees or (2) eliminating soil compaction affected RBS surface counts and body condition index (BCI) up to two-years post-treatment. Additionally, we assessed how surface counts of RBS were influenced by overstory tree cover. Surface counts of RBS were not strongly influenced by overstory removal when tree residuals were retained. Body condition index increased in treatments where harvest residuals were retained. In treatments where soil compaction was eliminated, surface counts and BCI were inversely related. Finally, surface counts from both mitigation strategies were not strongly influenced by overstory cover. Overall, both mitigation techniques appeared to ameliorate impacts of overstory removal on RBS. These results highlight the importance of understanding mechanisms driving species’ responses to forest management. To reduce the perceived negative effects of overstory removal on RBS, incorporating these mitigation measures may contribute to the viability and stability of RBS populations. Incorporating species’ life history traits into management strategies could increase continuity of ecological function and integrity through harvesting.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.





References
Achat DL, Deleuze C, Landmann G, Pousse N, Ranger J, Augusto L (2015) Quantifying consequences of removing harvesting residues on forest soils and tree growth—A meta-analysis. Ecol Manag 348:124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.03.042
Barrett K, Nibbelink NP, Maerz JC (2014) Identifying priority species and conservation opportunities under future climate scenarios: amphibians in a biodiversity hotspot. J Fish Wildl Manag 5:282–297. https://doi.org/10.3996/022014-JFWM-015
Brooks RT, Kyker-Snowman TD (2008) Forest floor temperature and relative humidity following timber harvesting in southern New England, USA. Ecol Manag 254:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.028
Brooks SP, Gelman A (1998) General methods of monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat 7:434–455
Bunnell FL, Houde I (2010) Down wood and biodiversity—implications to forest practices. Environ Rev 18:397–421. https://doi.org/10.1139/A10-019
Burton TM, Likens GE (1975a) Salamander populations and biomass in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire. Copeia 3:541–546
Burton TM, Likens GE (1975b) Energy flow and nutrient cycling in salamander populations in the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest. N Hamps Ecol 56:1068–1080
Casella G (2008) Statistical Design. Springer, New York, NY, USA
Carusco NM (2016) Surface retreats used among four genera of terrestrial salamander in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. J Herp 50:87–93
Davic RD, Welsh Jr HH (2004) On the ecological role of salamanders. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:405–434
deMaynadier PG, Hunter Jr ML (1995) The relationship between forest management and amphibian ecology: a review of the North American literature. Environ Rev 3:230–261
Dennis RWJ, Malcolm JR, Smith SM, Bellocq MI (2018) Response of saproxylic insect communities to logging history, tree species, stage of decay, and wood posture in the central Nearctic boreal forest. J Res 29:1365–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0543-z
Duguay JP, Wood PB (2002) Salamander abundance in regenerating forest stands on the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sci 48:331–335. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/48.2.331
Eberhardt LL (1976) Quantitative ecology and impact assessment. J Environ Manag 4:1
ESRI [EnvironmentalSystems Research Institute] (2018) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.7. Redlands, California, USA
Franklin JF, Mitchell RJ, Palik BJ (2007) Natural disturbance and stand development principles for ecological forestry. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep NRS-19, Newtown Square, PA
Gabor CR (1995) Correlational test of Mathis’ hypothesis that bigger salamander have better territories. Copeia 3:729–735
Garrick RC, Reppel DK, Morgan JT, Burgess S, Hyseni C, Worthington RJ, Ulyshen MD (2019) Trophic interactions among dead-wood-dependent forest arthropods in the southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Food Webs 18:e00112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2018.e00112
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2014) Bayesian data analysis, Third ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
Gray AN, Spies TA, Easter MJ (2002) Microclimate and soil moisture responses to gap formation in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Can J Res 32:332–343. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-200
Grover MC (1998) Influence of cover and moisture on abundances of the terrestrial salamanders Plethodon glutinosus. J Herp 32:489–497
Grover MC (2000) Determinants of salamander distributions along moisture gradients. Copeia 2000:156–168. https://doi.org/10.1643/0045-8511(2000)2000[0156:DOSDAM]2.0.CO;2
Hachè S, Pètry T, Villard MA (2013) Numerical response of breeding birds following experimental selection harvesting in northern hardwood forests. Avian Conserv Ecol 8:4. https://doi.org/10.5751/ACE-00584-080104
Hairson NG (1987) Community ecology and salamander guilds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, Lienkaemper GW, Cromack K, Cummins KW (1986) Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res 15:133–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60121-X
Harper EB, Patrick DA, Gibbs JP (2015) Impact of forestry practices at a landscape scale on the dynamics of amphibian populations. Ecol Appl 25:2271–2284. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0962.1
Hesed KM (2012) Uncovering salamander ecology: a review of coverboard design. J Herpetol 46:442–450. https://doi.org/10.1670/10-220
Hickerson CM, Anthony CD, Walton BM (2017) Eastern red-backed salamanders regulate top-down effects in a temperate forest-floor community. Herpetol 73:180–189. https://doi.org/10.1655/HERPETOLOGICA-D-16-00081.1
Hillman SS, Withers PC, Drewers RC, Hillyard SD (2009) Ecological and Environmental Physiology of Amphibians. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA
Hocking DJ, Babbitt KJ (2014) Amphibian contributions to ecosystem services. Herpetol Conserv Biol 9:1–17
Hocking DJ, Connette GM, Conner CA, Scheffers BR, Pittman SE, Peterman WE, Semlitsch RD (2013a) Effects of experimental forest management on a terrestrial, woodland salamander in Missouri. Ecol Manag 287:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.013
Hocking DJ, Babbitt KJ, Yamasaki M (2013b) Comparison of silvicultural and natural disturbance effects on terrestrial salamanders in northern hardwood forests. Biol Conserv 167:194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.006
Homyack JA, Haas CA (2013) Effects of repeated-stand entries on terrestrial salamanders and their habitat. Southeast Nat 12:353–366. https://doi.org/10.1656/058.012.0209
Homyack JA, Haas CA, Hopkins WA (2011) Energetics of surface-active terrestrial salamanders in experimentally harvested forest. J Wildl Manag 75:1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.175
Homyack JA, Sucre EB, Haas CA, Fox TR (2010) Does Plethodon cinereus affect leaf litter decomposition and invertebrate abundances in mixed oak forest? J Herpetol 44:447–456. https://doi.org/10.1670/09-107.1
Jaeger RG (1980) Microhabitats of a terrestrial forest salamander. Copeia 1980:265–268
Kellner KF (2015) jagsUI: a wrapper around rjags to streamline JAGS analyses. R package version 1.4.1
Knapp SM, Haas CA, Harpole DN, Kirkpatrick RL (2003) Initial effects of clearcutting and alternative silvicultural practices on terrestrial salamander abundance. Conserv Bio 17:752–762. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02061.x
Küchler AW (1964) Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States (map). Special Publication 36. American Geographic Society, New York
Mahoney KR, Russell KR, Ford WM, Rodrigue JL, Riddle JD, Schuler TM, Adams MB (2016) Woodland salamander responses to a shelterwood harvest-prescribed burn silvicultural treatment within Appalachian mixed-oak forests. Ecol Manag 359:277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.042
Mazerolle MJ, Lapointe St-Pierre M, Imbeau L, Joanisse G (2021) Woodland salamander population structure and body condition under irregular shelterwood systems. Can J Res 51:1281–1291. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0405
McCarthy BC, Bailey RR (1994) Distribution and abundance of coarse woody debris in a managed forest landscape of the central Appalachians. Can J Res 24:1317–1329. https://doi.org/10.1139/x94-172
McKenny HC, Keeton WS, Donovan TM (2006) Effects of structural complexity enhancement on eastern red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus) populations in northern hardwood forests. Ecol Manag 230:186–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.034
Moseley KR, Ford WM, Edwards JW (2009) Local and landscape-scale factors influencing edge effects on woodland salamanders. Environ Monit Assess 151:425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0286-6
Mossman A, Lambert MR, Ashton MS, Wilke J, Duguid MC (2019) Two salamander species respond differently to timber harvests in a managed New England forest. PeerJ 7:e7604. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7604
Nappi A, Drapeau P, Leduc A (2015) How important is dead wood for woodpeckers foraging in eastern North American boreal forests? Ecol Manag 346:10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.02.028
NOAA [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration] (2020) National Weather Service Forecast Office, Charleston, WV. https://w2.weather.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=rlx
Otto CRV, Kroll AJ, McKenny HC (2013) Amphibian response to downed wood retention in managed forests: A prospectus for future biomass harvest in North America. Ecol Manag 304:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.04.023
Otto CRV, Roloff GJ, Thames RE (2014) Comparing population patterns to process: Abundance and survival of a forest salamander following habitat degradation. PLoS ONE 9:e93859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093859
Parker AJ (1982) The topographic relative moisture index: An approach to soil-moisture assessment in mountain terrain. Phys Geogr 3:160–168
Peele J, Nix C, Ruhl P, Chapman R, Zollner P, Saunders MR (2017) Effects of woody biomass harvest on a population of plethodontid salamanders in southeast Indiana. Am Midl Nat 178:132–143. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-178.1.132
Perry KI, Herms DA (2016) Response of the forest floor invertebrate community to canopy gap formation caused by early stages of emerald ash borer-induced ash mortality. Ecol Manag 375:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.034
Peterman WD, Semlitsch RD (2014) Spatial variation in water loss predicts terrestrial salamander distribution and population dynamics. Oecologia 176:357–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-014-3041-4
Petranka JW (1998) Salamanders of the United States and Canada. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C., USA
Plummer M (2017) JAGS Version 4.3.0 user manual
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Semlitsch RD (2002) Critical elements for biologically based recovery plans of aquatic-breeding amphibians. Conserv Biol 16:619–629
Smith CK, Petranka JW (2000) Monitoring terrestrial salamander: repeatability and validity of area-constrained cover object searches. J Herpetol 34:547–557
Steinbrenner EC (1995) The effects of repeated tractor trips on the physical properties of forest soils. Northwest Sci 29:155–159
Strojny CA, Hunter Jr ML (2009) Log diameter influences detection of Eastern Red-backed Salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) in harvest gaps, but not in close-canopy forest conditions. Herp Conserv 5:80–85
Sustainable Forestry Initiative (2015) SFI 2015–2019 Standards and Rules: Standards, Rules for Label Use, Procedures and Guidance.
Tilghman JM, Ramee SW, Marsh DM (2012) Meta-analysis of the effects of canopy removal on terrestrial salamander populations in North America. Biol Conserv 152:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.030
Walton BM (2013) Top-down regulation of litter invertebrates by a terrestrial salamander. Herpetologica 69:127–146
Welsh Jr HH, Droege S (2001) A case of using plethodontid salamanders for monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem integrity of North American forests. Conserv Biol 15:558–569
Wermelinger B, Moretti M, Duelli P, Lachat T, Boris Pezzatti G, Obrist MK (2017) Impact of windthrow and salvage-logging on taxonomic and functional diversity of forest arthropods. Ecol Manag 391:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.033
Westby-Gibson Jr J, Greenberg CH, Moorman CE, Forrest TG, Keyser TL, Simon DM, Warburton GS (2017) Short-term response of ground-dwelling macroarthropods to shelterwood harvests in a productive southern Appalachian upland hardwood forest. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep RP-SRS-59, Ashville, NC
WVGIS (West Virginia GIS Technical Center) (2019) WV State GIS Data Clearinghouse. http://wvgis.wvu.edu/about/about.php
Wyman RL (1998) Experimental assessment of salamanders as predators of detrital food webs: effects on invertebrates, decomposition and the carbon cycle. Biodivers Conserv 7:641–650
Zheng D, Chen J, Song B, Xu M, Sneed P, Jensen R (2000) Effects of silvicultural treatments on summer forest microclimate in southeastern Missouri Ozarks. Clim Res 15:45–59. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr015045
Acknowledgements
We thank the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources (WVDNR) for access to housing and study sites during the study. Additional educational funding assistance was provided by the Appalachian Vegetation Management Association. We thank WVDNR and Wildlife Management Institute employees for implementation of harvests and all the technicians that helped collect field data for this project. Donald Brown was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire Stennis projects WVA00122 and WVA00820, the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, and the U.S.D.A. Forest Service Northern Research Station. Salamander sampling was conducted under methods approved by the WVDNR (Permits 2016.143, 2017.104, 2018.110, and 2019.110) and the West Virginia University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 1602000305).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Margenau, E.L., Wood, P.B., Brown, D.J. et al. Evaluating Mechanisms of Short-term Woodland Salamander Response to Forest Management. Environmental Management 71, 321–333 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01735-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01735-3
Keywords
- Amphibian
- Plethodon
- Central Appalachia
- Ecological forestry
- Salamander
- West Virginia