Pesticides Hazardous Hotspots: Empirical Evidences from North India


The pesticide use in Indian agriculture showed a declining trend in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Since 2007, pesticide use gained an upward trend. To study the pesticide use pattern and identify pesticide hotspots, we collected data from a sample of 1201 apple, rice, vegetable, and cotton growers from the temperate Kashmir Valley, subtropical Jammu, and Punjab. Our study provided some interesting empirical results: prophylactic pesticide applications in apple crop making it a pesticide guzzler [25.2 kg of active ingredient (ai)/ha] with use of riskiest carcinogen pesticides (9 kg of a.i/ha) and field use environmental impact quotient (FEIQ) (620.4/ha) being the highest, the Kashmir Valley is the “pesticide hottest spot”, followed by cotton and rice areas of Punjab and vegetable cultivation in Jammu subtropics. Pesticides banned for use in vegetables, such as monocrotophos were also applied by farmers in vegetable crops. However, rice areas in Kashmir and Jammu were only treated with herbicides. The protective measures taken by farmers while mixing and applying pesticides were primitive, resulting in localized mild/moderate pesticide poisoning besides loss of consciousness. We also found that the official data on the pesticide use are underreported and hence unreliable. Our study shows that neither the pesticide use by mass nor the pesticide use frequency, in combination or alone, is the robust indicator to measure the pesticide hazardous hotspots; besides these, FEIQ and less hazardous pesticides that are not probable or possible carcinogen should be rather used in conjunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.


  1. Agranova (2013) Agrochemicals-executive review (24th edn). Agranova, UK

  2. Aktar MW, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A (2009) Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdisc Toxicol 2(1):1–12.

  3. Alagh YK (1988) Pesticides in India agriculture. Econ Polit Wkly 20:1959–1964.

  4. Arora S, Sehgal M, Srivastava DS, Arora S, Sarkar SK (2019) Rice pest management with reduced risk pesticides in India. Environ Monit Assess.

  5. Babcock BA, Lichtenberg E, Zilberman D (1992) Impact of damage control and quality of output: estimating pest control effectiveness. Am J Agric Econ 74:165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker BP, Benbrook CM, Groth III E, Lutz Benbrook K (2002) Pesticide residues in conventional, integrated pest management (IPM)—grown and organic foods: insights from three US data sets. Food Addit Contam 19:427–446.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bambawala OM, Pati SB, Sharma OP, Tanwar RK (2004) Cotton IPM at crossroad. In Proc international symposium on strategies for sustainable cotton production: A global vision. The University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka, India, pp 33–36

  8. Barik A, Singh RP, Joshi SS (2002) Technology mission on cotton in nutshell. Directorate of cotton development, Mumbai, India

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benbrook C (2001) Do GM crops mean less pesticide use? Pestic Outlook 12:204–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernsten RH (1977) Constraints to higher rice yields in the Philippines. Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

  11. Bhat AR, Wani MA, Kirmani AR, Raina TH (2010) Pesticides and brain cancer linked in orchard farmers of Kashmir. Indian J Me Paediat Oncol 31(4):110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Biddinger DJ, Leslie TW, Joshi NK (2014) Reduced-risk pest management programmes for Eastern US peach orchards: effects of arthropod predators, parasitoids and select pest. J Econ Entomol 107:1084–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brandt A, Gorenflo A, Siede R, Meixner M, Büchler R (2016) The neonicotinoids thiacloprid, imidacloprid, and clothianidin affect the immunocompetence of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). J Insect Physiol 86:40–47.

  14. Carpenter J, Lynch L, Trout T (2001) Township limits on 1,3-D will impact adjustment to methyl bromide phase-out. Calif Agric 55:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cornell (2003) Common pesticides in groundwater, Accessed 21 Jan 2003

  16. Cresswell JE (2010) A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees. Ecotoxicology 20(1):149–157.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cross P (2012) Pesticide hazard trends in orchard fruit production in Great Britain from 1992 to 2008: a time-series analysis. Pest Manag Sci 69:768–774.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DES J&K (2017) Economic Survey, J&K 2017. Directorate of economics and statistics. Government of Jammu and Kashmir, Jammu and Kashmir, India

  19. DHFW (2013) State wide door to door campaign, cancer awareness and symptom based early detection. Government of Punjab, Chandigarh, India

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dhonthi P (2010) Cancer express.–498286.aspx. Accessed 23 Sep 2012

  21. Dushoff J, Caldwell B, Mohler CL (1994) Evaluating the environmental effect of pesticides: a critique of the environmental impact quotient. Am Entomol Fall 180–184.

  22. Dutta S, Bahadur M (2019a) Effect of pesticide exposure on the cholinesterase activity of the occupationally exposed tea garden workers of northern part of West Bengal, India. Biomarkers 24(4):317–324.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dutta S, Bahadur M (2019b) Comet assay genotoxicity evaluation of occupationally exposed tea-garden workers in northern West Bengal, India. Mutat Res Gen Tox En.

  24. EPA (2018) Chemical evaluated for carcinogenic potential annual cancer report 2018, U.S environmental protection agency office of pesticide program.

  25. Epstein L, Bassein S (2003) Patterns of pesticide use in California and the implications for strategies for reduction of pesticides. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:351–375.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eshenaur B, Grant J, Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degni J, Tette J (2019) Environmental impact quotient: a method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. New York State Integrated Pest Management Program, Cornell Cooperative Extension, Cornell University. 1992–2020. Accessed 18 Sep 2019

  27. Fairbrother A, Purdy J, Anderson T, Fell R (2014) Risks of neonicotinoid insecticides to honeybees. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:719–731.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. FAOSTAT (2019) Pesticides.

  29. FICCI (2011) Conference on Agro chemicals-2011. Department of chemicals and petrochemicals, Government of India and Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI). Accessed 3 Oct 2019

  30. Frank DL (2018) Evaluation of fruit bagging as a pest management option for direct pests of apple. Insects 9:178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Garg V, Verma S (2010) Trends of poisoning in rural area of South-West, Punjab. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 3:189–93

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goodell G (1984a) Challenges to international pest management research and extension in the third world: Do we really want IPM to work? Bull Entomol Soc Am 30:18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Groth E III, Benbrook CM, Lutz K (1999) Do you know what you’re eating? An analysis of SU government data on pesticides residues in foods. Consumers union of United States, inc., public service project department, technical division. Accessed 6 July 2012

  34. Hart K, Pimentel D (2002) Public health and costs of pesticides. In: Pimentel D (ed) Encyclopedia of pest management. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp 677–679

  35. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York, USA

  36. Hubbell BJ, Carlson GA (1998) Effects of insecticide attributes on within-season insecticide product and rate choices: the case of U.S. apple growers. Am J Agric Econ 80(2):382–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Keifer M, McConnell R, Pacheco AF, Daniel W, Rosenstock L (1996) Estimating underreported pesticide poisonings in Nicaragua. Am J Ind Med 30(2):195–201.<195::AID-AJIM10>3.0.CO;2-S

  38. Kenmore PE (1997) A perspective on IPM. Low external-input and sustainable. Agric Newsl 13:8–9

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kniss AR, Coburn CW (2015) Quantitative evaluation of the environmental impact quotient (EIQ) for comparing herbicides. PLoS ONE 10:e0131200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degni J, Tette J (1992) A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. N Y Food Life Sci Bull 139:1–8.

  41. Kranthi KR, Jadhav DR, Wanjari RR, Kranthi S, Russell D (2001a) Pyrethroid resistance and mechanisms in field strains of Helicoverpa armigera Hubner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 94:253–263

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kranthi KR, Jadhav DR, Wanjari RR, Shakir A, Russell DA (2001b) Carbamate and organophosphate resistance in cotton pests in India, 1995–1999. Bull Entomol Res 91:37–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kranthi KR, Jadhav DR, Kranthi S, Wanjari RR, Ali SS, Russell DA (2002) Insecticide resistance in five major insect pests of cotton in India. Crop Prot 21(6):449–460.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kranthi KR, Russell D (2009) Changing trends in cotton pest management. In: Peshin R, Dhawan AK (eds) Integrated pest management: innovation-development process, 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 499–541.

  45. Kudsk P, Jørgensen LN, Ørum JE (2018) Pesticide load—a new Danish pesticide risk indicator with multiple applications. Land Use Policy 70:384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kunstadter P, Prapamontol T, Siririjn BO, Sontirat A, Tansuhaj A, Khamboonruang C (2001) Pesticide exposure among Hmong farmers in Thailand. Int J Occup Med Env 7:313–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Latifovic L, Freeman LEB, Spinelli JJ, Pahwa M, Kachuri L, Blair A, Cantor KP, Zahm SH, Weisenburger DD, McLaughlin JR, Dosman JA, Pahwa P, Koutros S, Demers PA, Harris SA (2020) Pesticide use and risk of Hodgkin lymphoma: results from the North American Pooled Project (NAPP). Cancer Cause Control 31(6):583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee WJ, Sandler DP, Blair A, Samanic C, Cross AJ, Alavanja MCR (2007) Pesticide use and colorectal cancer risk in the agricultural health study. Int J Cancer 121:339–346.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Litsinger JA, Libetario EM, Canapi BL (2009) Eliciting farmers knowledge, attitudes, and practices in the development of integrated pest management programs for rice in Asia. In: Peshin R, Dhawan AK (Eds.) Integrated pest management: dissemination and impact, 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 119–274

  50. London L, de Grosbois S, Wesseling C, Kisting S, Rother HA, Mergler D (2002) Pesticide usage and health consequences for women in developing countries: out of sight, out of mind? Int J Occup Med Env 8:46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mancini F, Van Bruggen AHC, Jiggins LS, Ambatipud AC, Murphy H (2006) Incidence of acute pesticide poisoning among female and male cotton growers. Int J Occup Med Env 11(3):221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mayee CD, Singh P, Dongre AB, Roa MRK, Raj S (2002) Transgenic Bt cotton. Central institute for cotton research, India, p 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  53. MoAFW (2019) Consumption of chemical pesticides in various States/UTS during 2014-15 to 2018-19.Directorate of plant protection, quarantine & storage, department of agriculture, cooperation & farmers welfare, ministry of agriculture & farmers welfare, government of India. Accessed 8 Aug 2019

  54. Murali R, Bhall A, Singh D, Singh S (2009) Acute pesticide poisoning: 15 years experience of a large North-West Indian hospital. J Clin Toxicol 47(1):35–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Oka IN (1991) Success and challenges of the Indonesian integrated pest management program in the rice based cropping system. Crop Prot 10:163–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. PAN (2002) Pesticide use reporting legal framework. Data processing and utilisation: part one: full reporting systems in California and Oregon, Pesticide Action Network, Hamburg,

  57. PAN Europe (2003) Pesticide use reduction is working: an assessment of national reduction strategies in Denmark, Sweden, Netherland and Norway. Accessed 1 June 2012

  58. Peshin R, Zhang W (2014) Integrated pest management and pesticide use. In: Pimentel D, Peshin R (eds) Integrated pest management: pesticide problems. 3. Springer, Dordrecht the Netherlands, pp 1–46

  59. Peshin R, Bandral RS, Zhang W, Wilson L, Dhawan AK (2009a) Integrated Pest Management: a Global Overview of History, Programs and Adoption. In: Peshin R, Dhawan AK (eds) Integrated Pest Management: Innovation Development Process, 1. Springer, Dordrecht the Netherlands, pp 1–49

    Google Scholar 

  60. Peshin R, Dhawan AK, Kranthi K, Singh K (2009b) Evaluation of the benefits of an Insecticide resistance management programme in Punjab in India. Int J Pest Manag 55(3):207–220.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Peshin R (2005) Evaluation of dissemination of insecticides resistance management technology in cotton crop in Punjab. Dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India

  62. Peshin R, Dhawan AK, Vatta K, Singh K (2007) Attributes and socio-economic dynamics of adopting Bt cotton. Econ Political Wkly 41:73–80.

  63. Peshin R, Kranthi KR, Sharma R (2014) Pesticide use and experiences with integrated pest management programs and Bt cotton in India. In: Peshin R, Pimentel D (eds) Integrated pest management: experiences with implementation: global overview 4. Springer, Dordrecht the Netherlands, pp 269–306

  64. Peterson RKD, Schleier III JJ (2014) A probabilistic analysis reveals fundamental limitations with the environmental impact quotient and similar systems for rating pesticide risks. PeerJ 2:e364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Peterson RKD, Schleier III JJ (2014) A probabilistic analysis reveals fundamental limitations with the environmental impact quotient and similar systems for rating pesticide risks. PeerJ 2:e364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Pimentel D (1997) Pest management in agriculture. In: Pimentel D (ed) Techniques for reducing pesticides: environmental and economic benefits. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom, pp 1–12

  67. Pimentel D, Burgess M (2014) Environmental and economic benefits of reducing pesticide use. In: Pimentel D, Peshin R (eds) Integrated pest management: pesticide problems, 3. Springer, Dordrecht the Netherlands, pp 127–166

  68. Pimentel D, Stachow U, Takacs DA, Brubaker HW, Dumas AR, Meaney JJ, O'Neil JAS, Onsi DE, Crozilius DB (1992) Conserving biological diversity in agriculture/forestry systems. Bioscience 42:354–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Pimentel D, Wilson C, McCullum C, Huang R, Dwen P, Flack J, Tran Q, Saltman T, Cliff B (1997) Economic and environmental benefits of biodiversity. Bioscience 47:747–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silve M, Nelson J, Lipner V, Giordano S, Horowitz A, D’amore M (1992) Environmental and human costs of pesticide use. Bioscience 42:750–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Pimentel D, Krummel J, Gallahan D, Hough J, Merrill A, Schreiner I, Vittum P, Koziol F, Back E, Yen D, Fiance S (1978) Benefits and costs of pesticide use in United States food production. Bioscience 28(772):784–788

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pimentel D, McLaughlin, Zepp A, Lakitan B, Kraus T, Kleinman P, Vancini F, Roach WJ, Graap E, Keeton W, Sleig G (1991) Environmental and economic impacts of reducing US agricultural pesticide use (ed), Handbook on Pest Management in Agriculture. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 679–718

  73. Popp J, Pető K, Nagy J (2013) Pesticide productivity and food security. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Ruberson JR, Nemoto H, Hirose Y (1998) Pesticides and conservation of natural enemies in pest management. In: Barbosa P (ed) Conservation biological control. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 207–220

  75. Rundlöf M, Andersson GK, Bommarco R, Fries I, Hederström V, Herbertsson L, Jonsson O, Klatt BK, Pedersen TR, Yourstone J, Smith HK (2015) Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature 521(7550):77–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Sattler C, Kächele H, Verch G (2007) Assessing the intensity of pesticide use in agriculture. Agr Ecosyst Environ 119:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Sharma R, Peshin R (2016) Impact of integrated pest management of vegetables on pesticide use in subtropical Jammu, India. Crop Prot 84:105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sharma R, Peshin R, Shankar U, Kaul V, Sharma S (2015) Impact evaluation indicators of an integrated pest management program in vegetable crops in the subtropical region of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Crop Prot 67:191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Shetty PK, Sabitha M (2009) Economic and ecological externalities of pesticide use in India. In: Peshin R, Dhawan AK (eds) Integrated pest management: innovation development process, 1. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, p 113–129

  80. Shetty PK (2004) Socio-ecological implications of pesticide use in India. Econ Political Wkly 39(49):5261–5267.

  81. Siddoo-Atwal C (2019) An approach to cancer risk assessment and carcinogenic potential for three classes of agricultural pesticides. In: Peshin R, Dhawan A (eds) Natural resource management: ecological perspectives. Sustainability in plant and crop protection. Springer Nature, Switzerland AG, pp 109–132

  82. Silva V, Mol HGJ, Zomer P, Tienstra M, Ritsema CJ, Geissen V (2019) Pesticide residues in European agricultural soils—a hidden reality unfolded. Sci Total Environ 653(25):1532–1545.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Singh K, Oberoi S, Bhullar SD (2003) Poisoning trends in the malwa region of Punjab. J Punjab Acad Forensic Med Toxicol 3:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stuart S (2003) Development of resistance in pest populations. The University of Notre Dame.

  85. Waibel H, Fleischer G, Becker H (1999) The economic benefits of pesticides: a case study from Germany. Agrarwirtschaft 48:219–230

  86. Watts M (2014) Mancozeb. A pesticide action network Asia and the Pacific factsheet series.

  87. WHO (2010) The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification 2009. World Health Organization.

  88. Woodcock BA, Bullock JM, Shore RF, Heard MS, Pereira MG, Redhead J, Ridding L, Dean H, Sleep D, Henrys P, Peyton J, Hulmes S, Hulmes L, Sárospataki M, Saure C, Edwards M, Genersch E, Knäbe S, Pywell RF (2017) Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science 356(6345):1393–1395.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Zhang WJ (2018) Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Article global pesticide use: Profile, trend, cost/benefit and more 8(1):1–27. IAEES

  90. Zilberman D, Schmitz A, Casterline G, Lichtenberg E, Siebert JB (1991) The economics of pesticide use and regulation. Science 253:518–522

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was conducted under the Agricultural Extension Division of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research funded extramural project “Impact evaluation of integrated pest management technologies”. We are grateful to farmers from Kashmir, Jammu, and Punjab who spared their valuable time to provide information in face-to-face interview. We are highly grateful to Prof. John H. Perkins, Member of the Faculty Emeritus, the Evergreen State College, Kensington, CA, for critical comments and suggestions for improvement. We thank Sudha Prasad for editing the paper. We also thank three anonymous reviewers and editor-in-chief of this journal for their valuable criticism and comments that helped us to improve the article.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajinder Peshin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peshin, R., Hansra, B.S., Nanda, R. et al. Pesticides Hazardous Hotspots: Empirical Evidences from North India. Environmental Management (2020).

Download citation


  • Pesticide use in agriculture
  • Use of riskiest pesticides
  • Environmental impact
  • Pesticide hazards
  • Pesticide hotspots
  • Pesticide policy