Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How Does Socio-institutional Diversity Affect Collaborative Governance of Social–Ecological Systems in Practice?

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social and institutional diversity (“diversity” hereafter) are important dimensions in collaborative environmental governance, but lack empirical assessment. In this paper, we examine three aspects of diversity hypothesized in the literature as being important in collaborative forms of environmental governance—the presence of diverse actors, diverse perspectives, and diverse institutions. The presence of these aspects and formative conjectures were empirically considered using a mixed methods approach in four biosphere reserves in Sweden and Canada. We found that the diversity of actors involved and domains of authority varied among cases, that stakeholder perspectives were highly diverse in all cases, and that institutional variety (in terms of strategies, norms, and rules) was evident in all cases, but differed among them. Empirical support from the cases further affirms that diversity contributes to the ability to engage with a broader set of issues and challenges; diversity contributes to novel approaches to solving problems within the governance group; and diversity contributes to the flexibility of the group involved in governance in terms of addressing challenges. One conjecture, that diversity decreases the efficiency of governance in decision-making and responding to issues, was not supported by the data. However, our analysis indicates that there might be a trade-off between diversity and efficiency. The findings highlight differences in the ways in which diversity is conceptualized in the literature and on the ground, emphasizing the pragmatic advantages of actively seeking diversity in terms of competencies and capacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory 18:543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D et al. (2009) Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ 2:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand K (2006) Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability, and effectiveness. Environ Policy Gov 16:290–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird J, Velaniškis J, Plummer R, FitzGibbon J (2014) Political legitimacy and collaborative water governance. Int J Water Gov 2:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs R, Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2009) Spurious certainty: how ignoring measurement error and environmental heterogeneity may contribute to environmental controversies. BioScience 59:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, Leitch AM, Meek C, Quinlan A, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Robards MD, Schoon ML, Schultz L, West PC (2012) Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:421–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum S, Bodin Ö, Sandström A (2015) Tracing the sources of legitimacy: the impact of deliberation in participatory natural resource management Policy Sci 48:443–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin Ö, Österblom H (2013) International fisheries regime effectiveness—activities and resources of key actors in the Southern Ocean Glob Environ Change 23:948–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booher DE, Innes JE (2006) Complexity and adaptive policy systems: CALFED as an emergent form of governance for sustainable management of contested resources. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2006, Sonoma, CA, USA.

  • Brede M, de Vries BJM (2009) Networks that optimize a trade-off between efficiency and dynamical resilience. Phys Lett A 373:3910–3914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck FC, Kerschreiter R, Mojzisch A, Frey D, Schulz-Hardt S (2002) The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent. Eur J Soc Psychol 32:35–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D (1991) Bridging organizations and sustainable development. Hum Relat 44:807–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash D, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA (2014) A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19(3):56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2009) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuppen E (2012) Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods. Policy Sci 45:23–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (2000) Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T, Folke C, Nyström M, Peterson G, Bengtsson J, Walker B, Norberg J (2003) Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Front Ecol Environ 1(9):488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton CS (1958) The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (2004) Development as institutional change: the pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Stud Comp Int Dev 38:30–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasbergen P, Birmann F, Mol APJ (2007) Partnerships, governance and sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila T, Gerlak AK (2005) The formation of large‐scale collaborative resource management institutions: clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Policy Stud J 33:583–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Mostert E, Egas W, Moellenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C, Yalcin R (2009) Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecol Soc 14:26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes J, Booher D (2003) Collaborative policy-making: governance through dialogue. In: Maarten AH, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 33–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft S, Bavinck M, Johnson DS, Thomson KT (2009) Fisheries co-management and legal pluralism: how an analytical problem becomes an institutional one. Hum Organ 68:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koontz TM, Johnson EM (2004) One size does not fit all: matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sci 37:185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotschy K, Biggs R, Daw T, Folke C, West P (2015) Principle 1 - maintain diversity and redundancy. In: Biggs R, Schluter M, Schoon ML (eds) Principles for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 50–79

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lax DA, Sebenius JK (1986) The manager as negotiator: bargaining for cooperation and competitive gain. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos MC, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Res 31:297–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard R, Jones GT (1989) Quantifying diversity in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lietaer B, Ulanowicz RE, Goerner SJ, McLaren N (2010) Is our monetary structure a systemic cause for financial instability? Evidence and remedies from nature. J Future Stud 14:89–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Low B, Ostrom E, Simon C, Wilson J (2003) Redundancy and diversity: do they influence optimal management? In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p 83–114

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister RRJ, Taylor BM, Harman BP (2015) Partnership networks for urban development: how structure is shaped by risk. Policy Stud J 43:379–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann KS (2000) The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405:228–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naeem S, Bunker DE, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C (eds) (2009) Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MC, Hegmon M, Kulow SR, Peeples MA, Kintigh KW, Kinzig AP (2011) Resisting diversity: a long-term archaeological study. Ecol Soc 16:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norberg J, Wilson J, Walker B, Ostrom E (2008) Diversity and resilience of social-ecological systems. In: Norberg J, Cumming G (eds) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, p 46–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard RB, Baer P (2005) Collectively seeing complex systems: the nature of the problem. BioScience 55:953–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström M (2006) Redundancy and response diversity of functional groups: implications for the resilience of coral reefs. AMBIO J Hum Environ 35:30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1953) Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden. Ecol Soc 12:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Österblom H, Bodin Ö (2012) Global cooperation among diverse organizations to reduce illegal fishing in the Southern Ocean Conserv Biol 26:638–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2010) Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100:641–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, Baird J, Dzyundzyak A, Armitage D, Bodin Ö, Schultz L (2017) Is adaptive co-management delivering? Examining relationships between collaboration, learning and outcomes in UNESCO Biosphere Reserves Ecol Econ 140:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, FitzGibbon J (2004) Co-management of natural resources: a proposed framework. Environ Manag 33:876–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Foley J (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld JS (2002) Functional redundancy in ecology and conservation. Oikos 98:156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (2005) Collaborative approaches to watershed management. In: Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. The MIT Press, Cambridge, p 3–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström A, Crona B, Bodin Ö (2014) Legitimacy in co-management: the impact of pre-existing structures, social networks and governance strategies Environ Policy Gov 24:60–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L (2009) Nurturing resilience in social-ecological systems: lessons learned from bridging organizations. Dissertation, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

  • Schultz L, Duit A, Folke C (2011) Participation, adaptive co-management, and management performance in the world network of biosphere reserves. World Dev 39:662–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P (2007) Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environ Conserv 34:140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Folke C, Österblom H, Olsson P (2015) Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:7369–7374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Lundholm C (2010) Learning for resilience? Exploring learning opportunities in biosphere reserves. Environ Educ Res 16:645–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling A (2007) A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. J R Soc Interface 4:707–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE, Goerner SJ, Lietaer B, Gomez R (2009) Quantifying sustainability: resilience, efficiency and the return of information theory. Ecol Complex 6:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1996) Biosphere Reserves: The Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • van Buuren A, Klijn EH, Edelenbos J (2012) Democratic legitimacy of new forms of water management in the Netherlands. Int J Water Res Dev 28:629–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Abel N, Anderies JM, Ryan P (2009) Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia. Ecol Soc 14:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Gunderson L, Kinzig A, Folke C, Carpenter S, Schultz L (2006) A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westley F, Vredenburg H (1991) Strategic bridging: the collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products. J Appl Behav Sci 27:65–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondolleck JM, Yaffee SL (2000) Making collaboration work: lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by Vetenskapsrådet, the Swedish Research Council, grant 2012-5498. We also acknowledge funding by MISTRA through a core grant to Stockholm Resilience Centre. Participation by the managers and others from the Frontenac Arch, Georgian Bay, Kristianstads Vattenrike, and Östra Vätterbranterna Biosphere Reserves is gratefully acknowledged. Our thanks are also extended to our colleague, Beatrice Crona, for her insights in conceptualizing the project. Finally, we wish to acknowledge Flor de Luna Estrada, Malena Heinrup, Katrina Krievins, and Kerrie Pickering for their research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Assistant Professor, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre and the Department of Geography and Tourism Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada

    Julia Baird

  2. Professor and Director, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada

    Ryan Plummer

  3. Researcher, Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, SE, 106 91, Sweden

    Lisen Schultz & Örjan Bodin

  4. Environmental Change and Governance Group, School of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada

    Derek Armitage

Authors
  1. Julia Baird
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryan Plummer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisen Schultz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Derek Armitage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Örjan Bodin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Baird.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baird, J., Plummer, R., Schultz, L. et al. How Does Socio-institutional Diversity Affect Collaborative Governance of Social–Ecological Systems in Practice?. Environmental Management 63, 200–214 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1123-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1123-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation