Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Policy Coherence and Interplay between Climate Change Adaptation Policies and the Forestry Sector in Nepal

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Least Developed Countries are likely to be hit the hardest by climate change and need focused efforts towards adaptation. Nepal recognizes that it needs to integrate climate change adaptation into various policies, but limited understanding of how to make these policies coherent is among the factors that hinder effective adaptation action. This can lead to wasted resources and lost opportunities. This paper applies concepts from policy coherence for development frameworks and policy content analysis to examine coherence in Nepal’s climate and forest policies—and discusses the factors hindering effective implementation. The policies are analyzed at the horizontal/external level at three layers—motivation, measures, and planned implementation process. The paper finds that policies are more consistent on motivation level and adaptation measures, but are less coherent on implementation. The National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) is more explicit in identifying institutions, organizations, roles and responsibilities, resource allocation (financial), and a monitoring and evaluation plan for climate change adaptation while other policies such as Climate Change Policy 2011, National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2014–2020, Forest Policy 2015, and Forest Sector Strategy 2016 have critical gaps in this area. This paper conclude that formulation of a policy, articulating targets, and mobilizing financial resources are in themselves not sufficient to effectively address climate change adaptation. Policy-based legislation is required, together with development of a supportive collaborative multi-stakeholder approach at different levels of governance, backed up by effective, collaborative monitoring and enforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar-Schuster M, Thomas RJ, Stringer LC, Chasek P, Seely M (2011) Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: institutional, financial, legal and science-policy challenges and solutions. L Degrad Dev 22:299–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atela JO, Quinn CH, Minang PA, Duguma LA, Houdet JA (2016) Implementing REDD+ at the national level: stakeholder engagement and policy coherences between REDD+ rules and Kenya’s sectoral policies. Policy Econ 65:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behboudi R, Majid MR, Johar F (2015) Horizontal coherence in environmental policies of Iskandar Malaysia. J Teknol 73:139–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bele MY, Somorin O, Sonwa DJ, Nkem JN, Locatelli B (2011) Forests and climate change adaptation policies in Cameroon. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16:369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9264-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berelson B (1952) Content Analysis in Communication Research. Free press, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesbroek GR, Swart RJ, Carter TR, Cowan C, Henrichs T, Mela H, Morecroft MD, Rey D (2010) Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies. Glob Environ Chang 20:440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird N (2011) The future for climate finance in Nepal. ODI, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown HCP, Nkem JN, Sonwa DJ, Bele Y (2010) Institutional adaptive capacity and climate change response in the Congo Basin forests of Cameroon. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9216-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone M (2008) Mission Impossible: the European Union and Policy Coherence for Development. J Eur Integr 30:323–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330802144992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2009) EU 2009 Report on Policy Coherence for Development, SEC (2009) II37 final. Brussels

  • Colchester M, Boscolo M, Contreras-Hermosilla A, Gatto F Del, Dempsey J, Lescuyer G, Obidzinski K, Pommier D, Richards M, Sembiring SN, Tacconi L, Teresa M, Rios V, Wells A (2006) Justice in the forest: Rural livelihoods and forest law enforcement. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia

  • Dixit A, Subedi Y, Aryal N, Wenju R, Shrestha A (2016) Climate finance: Fund flow from national to sub-national level in Nepal. ISET-Nepal, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Dongol Y, Heinen JT (2012) Pitfalls of CITES implementation in Nepal: a policy gap analysis. Environ Manag 50:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9896-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duraiappah AK, Bhardwaj A (2007) Measuring Policy Coherence among the MEAs and MDGs. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Winnipeg, Manitoba

  • England MI, Dougill AJ, Stringer LC, Vincent K (2016) Climate change adaptation planning and policy coherence across sectors in southern Africa. In: 2016 Berlin Conference on Global Environmental Change: Transformative Global Climate Governance “après Paris”, Berlin 23–24 May 2016. Berlin

  • Ford J, Berrang-Ford L, Lesnikowski A, Barrera M, Heyman SJ (2013) How to track climate change adaptation: a typology of approaches for national-level application. Ecol Soc 18:40. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05732-180340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Bunce A, McKay C, Irwin M, Pearce T (2015) The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and Asia. Reg Environ Chang 15:801–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0648-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerlings H, Stead D (2003) The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research. Transp Policy 10:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00020-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomar JOV, Stringer LC, Paavola J (2014) Regime complexes and national policy coherence: Experiences in the biodiversity cluster. Glob Gov A Rev Multilater Int Organ 20:119–145

    Google Scholar 

  • GoN (2011a) Climate change policy, 2011. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Science Technology and Environment, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • GoN (2011b) Role of forest on climate change adaptation. Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, REDD- Forestry and Climate Change Cell, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • GoN (2014) Nepal national biodiveristy strategy and action plan 2014-2020. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • GoN (2016a) Forest sector strategy (2016-25). Government of Nepal, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • GoN (2016b) Budget speech of fiscal year 20016/17. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Finance, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S, Bangalore M, Bonzanigo L, Fay M, Kane T, Narloch U, Rozenberg J, Treguer D, Vogt-Schilb A (2011) Shock waves: Managing the impacts of climate change on poverty. Climate change and development series. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Harahap F, Silveira S, Khatiwada D (2017) Land allocation to meet sectoral goals in Indonesia—An analysis of policy coherence. Land Use Policy 61:451–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardee K, Mutunga C (2010) Strengthening the link between climate change adaptation and national development plans: lessons from the case of population in National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs). Insectes Soc 57:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-009-9208-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Helvetas (2011) Nepal’s climate change policies and plans: Local communities’ perspective environment and climate series 2011/1. HELVETAS Swiss Intercooperation Nepal, Lalitpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoebink P (2005a) Evaluating Maastricht’s triple C: The “C” of coherence. In: Hoebink P (ed) The Treaty of Maastricht and Europe’s Development Co-operation. Aksant Academic, Amsterdam, pp 183–218

  • Hoebink P (2005b) Coherence and development policy: an autopsy with some European examples. In: Obrovsky M (ed) Österreichische Entwicklungspolitik – Analysen, Informationen 2004. EU – Entwicklungspolitik – Quo Vadis? ÖFSE, Wien, pp 37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoebink P (2008) A tale of two countries: Perspectives from the South on the coherence of EU policies. In: Hoebink P, Slootweg S, Smith L (eds) Tales of Development: People, Power and Space. Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 187–204

  • Huttunen S, Kivimaa P, Virkamäki V (2014) The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production. Environ Innov Soc Transit 12:14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Working Group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, Lenschow A (2010) Policy paper environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environ Policy Gov 20:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juhola S, Westerhoff L (2011) Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environ Sci Policy 14:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaba FK, Quinn CH, Dougill AJ (2014) Policy coherence and interplay between Zambia’s forest, energy, agricultural and climate change policies and multilateral environmental agreements. Int Environ Agreem Polit Law Econ 14:181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-013-9236-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalaba FK, Quinn CH, Dougill AJ (2013) Contribution of forest provisioning ecosystem services to rural livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Zambia. Popul Environ 35:159–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-013-0189-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (2000) Cautionary tales: adaptation and the global poor. Clim Change 45:5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khadka NS (2009) Vicious forest fires in Nepal raise climate change questions. In: Guard. Envrionment. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/apr/24/nepal-forest-fires-climate-change. Accessed 20 Jun 2015

  • Kivimaa P, Mickwitz P (2009) Making the climate count: Climate policy integration and coherence in Finland. Helsinki

  • Kok MTJ, de Coninck HC (2007) Widening the scope of policies to address climate change: directions for mainstreaming. Environ Sci Policy 10:587–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen RK, Powell N (2013) Policy coherence for sustainable agricultural development: uncovering prospects and pretence within the Swedish policy for global development. Dev Policy Rev 31:757–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli B, Brockhaus M, Buck A, Thompson I, Bahamondex C, Murdock T, Roberts G, Webbe J (2010) Forests and adaptation to climate change: Challenges and opportunities. In: Mery G, Kaltila P, Galloway G, Alfaro R, Kanninen M, Lobovikov M, Varjo J (eds) Forest and society: Responding to global drivers of change. IUFRO, Vienna, Austria, pp 21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkonen M, Huttunen S, Primmer E, Repo A, Hildén M (2015) Policy coherence in climate change mitigation: an ecosystem service approach to forests as carbon sinks and bioenergy sources. Policy Econ 50:153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May PJ, Jones BD, Beem BE, Neff-Sharum Ea, Poague MK (2005) Policy coherence and component-driven policy making: arctic policy in Canada and the United States. Policy Stud J 33:37–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mickwitz P, Aix F, Beck S, Carss D, Ferrand N, Görg C, Jensen A, Kivimaa P, Kuhlicke C, Kuindersma W, Máñez M, Melanen M, Monni S, Pedersen AB, Reinert H, Van Bommel S (2009) Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. PEER Report No 2, Partnership for European Environmental Research, Helsinki

  • MoE (2010) National adaptation programme of action (NAPA) to climate change. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Environment, Kathmandu, Nepal, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • NCVST (2009) Through the Eyes of the VULNERABILITY Climate Change Induced Uncertainties and. Institute for Social and Environmental Transition- Nepal (ISET-N, Kathmandu) and Insitute for Social and Envrionmental Transition (ISET, Boulder, Colorado) For Nepal Climate Vulnerability Study Team (NCVST), Kathmandu

  • Nilsson M, Zamparutti T, Petersen JE, Nykvist B, Rudberg P, Mcguinn J (2012) Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environ Policy Gov 22:395–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkem J, Kalame FB, Idinoba M, Somorin OA, Ndoye O, Awono A (2010) Shaping forest safety nets with markets: adaptation to climate change under changing roles of tropical forests in Congo Basin. Environ Sci Policy 13:498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NPC (2011) Climate Resilient Planning, [Working Document]. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission, Kathmandu

  • NPC (2012) Climate Change Budget Code, documenting the national process of arriving at multi-sectoral, consensus, criteria and method. Government of Nepal, National Planning Commission with support from UNDP/UNEP, Kathmandu, Nepal

  • Oberthür S, Gehring T (2006) Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: The case of the cartagena protocol and the world trade organization. Glob Environ Polit 6:1–31. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2006.6.2.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2002) Improving Policy Coherence and Integration for Sustainable Development: a Checklist. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

  • OECD (2003) Development and climate change in Nepal: Focus on water resources and hydropower. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojha HR, Ghimire S, Pain A, Nightingale A, Khatri DB, Dhungana H (2015) Policy without politics: technocratic control of climate change adaptation policy making in Nepal. Clim Policy 16:415–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.1003775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam (2014) Finding the money: A stock taking of climate change adaptation finance and governance in Nepal. Oxfam, Country Office, Nepal, Lalitpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey SS, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN (2016) Assessing the roles of community forestry in climate change mitigation and adaptation: A case study from Nepal. Ecol Manag 360:400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto R (2004) Policy Coherence and Development Evaluation- Concepts, Issues and Possible Approaches. Background paper for OECD Workshop: Policy Coherence for Development, 18–19 May, Paris

  • Regmi BR, Bhandari D (2012) Climate change governance and funding dilemma in. TMC Acad J 7:40–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi BR, Bhandari D (2013) Climate change adaptation in Nepal: exploring ways to overcome the barriers. J Livelihood 11:43–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Regmi BR, Star C, Leal Filho W (2014) Effectiveness of the local adaptation plan of action to support climate change adaptation in Nepal. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 21:461–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9610-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito N (2013) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in least developed countries in South and Southeast Asia. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18:825–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9392-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberg T (2016) Climate Change Blamed for Half of Increased Forest Fire Danger. In: New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/11/science/climate-change-forest-fires.html?_r=0. Accessed 20 Oct 2016

  • Sharma SK (2011) The political economy of climate change governance in the Himalayan region of Asia: A case study of Nepal. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 14:129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp L, Richardson T (2001) Reflections on foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. J Environ Policy Plan 3:193–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jepp.88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen L (2016) Theorising politics behind policy coherence for development (PCD). Eur J Dev Res 28:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari KR, Rayamajhi S, Pokharel RK, Balla MK (2014) Does Nepal’s climate change adaptation policy and practices address poor and vulnerable communities? J Law 23:2224–3259

    Google Scholar 

  • Urwin K, Jordan A (2008) Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Glob Environ Chang 18:180–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was undertaken by the Himalayan Climate Change Adaptation Program (HICAP) at the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). HICAP is implemented jointly by ICIMOD, CICERO, and Grid-Arendal in collaboration with local partners and is funded by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway, the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA), and core funds from ICIMOD contributed by the Governments of Afghanistan, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Norway, Pakistan, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. The views and interpretations in this publication are those of the authors and should not be attributed to ICIMOD, HICAP, or their donors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunita Ranabhat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranabhat, S., Ghate, R., Bhatta, L.D. et al. Policy Coherence and Interplay between Climate Change Adaptation Policies and the Forestry Sector in Nepal. Environmental Management 61, 968–980 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1027-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1027-4

Keywords

Navigation