Characterizing the Breadth and Depth of Volunteer Water Monitoring Programs in the United States
A survey of 345 volunteer water monitoring programs in the United States was conducted to document their characteristics, and perceived level of support for data to inform natural resource management or policy decisions. The response rate of 86% provided information from 46 states. Programs represented a range of ages, budgets, objectives, scopes, and level of quality assurance, which influenced data uses and perceived support by sponsoring agency administrators and external decision makers. Most programs focused on rivers, streams, and lakes. Programs had not made substantial progress to develop EPA or state-approved quality assurance plans since 1998, with only 48% reporting such plans. Program coordinators reported feeling slightly more support for data to be used for management as compared to policy decisions. Programs with smaller budgets may be at particular risk of being perceived to lack credibility due to failure to develop quality assurance plans. Over half of programs identified as collaborative, in that volunteers assisted scientists in program design, data analysis and/or dissemination of results. Just under a third were contributory, in which volunteers primarily collected data in a scientist-defined program. Recommendations to improve perceived data credibility, and to augment limited budgets include developing quality assurance plans and gaining agency approval, and developing partnerships with other organizations conducting monitoring in the area to share resources and knowledge. Funding agencies should support development of quality assurance plans to help ensure data credibility. Service providers can aid in plan development by providing training to program staff over time to address high staff turnover rates.
KeywordsCitizen science Public participation in scientific research Volunteer monitoring Watershed management
The authors wish to acknowledge the input of volunteer monitoring program coordinators from across the United States that informed this research. Thanks also to Kristen Livingstone and Sergei Bluman for assistance in compiling 1998 comparison data.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with applicable ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Adler JH (2002) Fables of the Cuyahoga: reconstructing a history of environmental protection. Faculty Publications Paper 191 http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/191. Accessed 29 Mar 2016
- BEACH Act (Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act). (2000) Public Law 106–284, Accessed 10 Oct 2000Google Scholar
- Biedermann, J, Blasczyk J (2006) Citizen water monitoring survey–-Streams. Final Report. http://watermonitoring.uwex.edu/pdf/level1/news/2006WAVSurveyResults.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 2017
- Clean air act extension of 1970 (1970) 84 Stat. 1676, P.L. 91–604Google Scholar
- Clean Water Act (1972) (Federal Water Pollution Control Act) of 1972 § 1251Google Scholar
- Copeland C (2016) Clean Water Act: a summary of the law. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Dillman DA (2007) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- Doremus H (1999) Preserving citizen participation in the era of reinvention: the Endangered Species Act example. Ecol Law Q 25(4):707–717Google Scholar
- Ely E (2006) Writing a QA plan for observational monitoring. Volunt Monit 18(2):19Google Scholar
- Ely E, Hamingson E (1998) National directory of volunteer environmental monitoring programs, 5th Edn. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- Endangered Species Act (1973) 16 U.S.C. §1531 et seqGoogle Scholar
- IBM Corp (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21. IBM Corp, Armonk, NYGoogle Scholar
- Lee V (1988) Rhode Island volunteers monitor the health of salt ponds. Ocean OCEAAK 31:5Google Scholar
- National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (1970) Pub.L. 91–190, Approved 1 Jan 1970Google Scholar
- Overdevest, C, Orr, CH, Stepenuck, K (2004) Volunteer stream monitoring and local participation in natural resource issues. Human Ecol Rev 11(2):177–185Google Scholar
- Pfeffer MJ, Wagenet LP (2007) Volunteer environmental monitoring, knowledge creation and citizen–scientist interaction. The SAGE handbook of environment and society. Sage, London, p 235–250Google Scholar
- Raddick, MJ, Bracey, G, Gay, PL, Lintott, CJ, Murray, P, Schawinski, K, et al. (2009) Galaxy zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Preprint at arXiv:0909.2925Google Scholar
- Rotman, D, Preece, J, Hammock, J, Procita, K, Hansen, D, Parr, C, et al. (2012) Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work, p 217–226Google Scholar
- Storey, R, Wright-Stow, A, Kin, E, Davies-Colley, R, Stott, R (2016) Volunteer stream monitoring: Do the data quality and monitoring experience support increased community involvement in freshwater decision making? Ecol Soc 21(4):32Google Scholar
- U.S. EPA. (1990) Volunteer water monitoring: a guide for state managers. 440/4-90-010Google Scholar
- U.S. EPA. (1996) Fact sheet series: community-based environmental protection. 100-F-96-002Google Scholar
- U.S. EPA. (2002) Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of information disseminated by the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/260R-02-008Google Scholar
- U.S. EPA. (2017) Quality Assurance Project Plan for Citizen Science Projects. https://www.epa.gov/citizen-science/quality-assurance-project-plan-citizen-science-projects Accessed 29 Oct 2017
- WDNR (2015a) Wisconsin’s Water Monitoring Strategy: 2015–2020. http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/surfacewater/monitoring/strategy/Strategy_2015_2020.pdf. Accessed 14 Oct 2017
- WDNR (2015b) Wisconsin Beach Monitoring and Assessments. http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/beaches/monitoring.html. Accessed 29 Mar 2016