Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 61, Issue 1, pp 171–180 | Cite as

Toxicological Assessment and UV/TiO2-Based Induced Degradation Profile of Reactive Black 5 Dye

  • Muhammad Bilal
  • Tahir Rasheed
  • Hafiz M. N. Iqbal
  • Hongbo Hu
  • Wei Wang
  • Xuehong Zhang
Article

Abstract

In this study, the toxicological and degradation profile of Reactive Black 5 (RB5) dye was evaluated using a UV/TiO2-based degradation system. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thin layer chromatography (TLC), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) techniques were used to evaluate the degradation level of RB5. The UV-Vis spectral analysis revealed the disappearance of peak intensity at 599 nm (λmax). The FT-IR spectrum of UV/TiO2 treated dye sample manifest appearance of new peaks mainly because of the degraded product and/or disappearance of some characteristics peaks which were present in the untreated spectrum. The HPLC profile verified the RB5 degradation subject to the formation of metabolites at different retention times. A stable color removal higher than 96% with COD removal in the range of 74–82.3% was noted at all evaluated dye concentrations. The tentative degradation pathway of RB5 is proposed following a careful analysis of the intermediates identified by UPLC-MS. Toxicity profile of untreated and degraded dye samples was monitored using three types of human cell lines via MTT assay and acute toxicity testing with Artemia salina. In conclusion, the UV/TiO2-based degradation system could be effectively employed for the remediation of textile wastewater comprising a high concentration of reactive dyes.

Keywords

Photocatalysis Reactive Black 5 Degradation by-product Toxicity MTT assay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology and The School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China for providing experimental facilities. The technical and analytical assistance provided by Center of Life-Science Experiments, Instrumental Analysis Center of SJTU is also thankfully acknowledged.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Abadulla E, Tzanov T, Costa S, Robra KH, Cavaco-Paulo A, Gübitz GM (2000) Decolorization and detoxification of textile dyes with a laccase from Trametes hirsuta. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(8):3357–3362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed I, Dhama K,Iqbal HMN (2017) Enzyme-based biodegradation of hazardous pollutants – An overview. J Exp Biol Agric Sci, 5(4):402–411.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18006/2017.5(4).402.411
  3. Ajmal A, Majeed I, Malik RN, Idriss H, Nadeem MA (2014) Principles and mechanisms of photocatalytic dye degradation on TiO2 based photocatalysts: a comparative overview. Rsc Adv 4(70):37003–37026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asgher M, Shah SAH, Iqbal HMN (2016) Statistical correlation between ligninolytic enzymes secretion and Remazol Brilliant Yellow-3GL dye degradation potential of Trametes versicolor IBL-04. Water Environ Res 88(4):338–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilal M, Asgher M (2015) Dye decolorization and detoxification potential of Ca-alginate beads immobilized manganese peroxidase. BMC Biotechnol 15(1):111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilal M, Asgher M, Iqbal HMN, Hu H, Zhang X (2017a) Bio-based degradation of emerging endocrine-disrupting and dye-based pollutants using cross-linked enzyme aggregates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(8):7035–7041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilal M, Asgher M, Iqbal HMN, Hu H, Wang W, Zhang X (2017b) Bio-catalytic performance and dye-based industrial pollutants degradation potential of agarose-immobilized MnP using a Packed Bed Reactor System. Int J Biol Macromol 102:582–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilal M, Iqbal HMN, Hu H, Wang W, Zhang X (2017c) Enhanced bio-catalytic performance and dye degradation potential of chitosan-encapsulated horseradish peroxidase in a packed bed reactor system. Sci Total Environ 575:1352–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilal M, Iqbal HMN, Shah SZH, Hu H, Wang W, Zhang X (2016) Horseradish peroxidase-assisted approach to decolorize and detoxify dye pollutants in a packed bed bioreactor. J Environ Manage 183:836–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borges ME, Sierra M, Méndez-Ramos J, Acosta-Mora P, Ruiz-Morales JC, Esparza P (2016) Solar degradation of contaminants in water: TiO2 solar photocatalysis assisted by up-conversion luminescent materials. Solar Energ Mater Solar Cells 155:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatha SAS, Asgher M, Iqbal HMN (2017) Enzyme-based solutions for textile processing and dye contaminant biodegradation—a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:14005–14018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chatterjee D, Dasgupta S (2005) Visible light induced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 6(2):186–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. El Bouraie M, El Din WS (2016) Biodegradation of reactive black 5 by Aeromonas hydrophila strain isolated from dye-contaminated textile wastewater. Sustain Environ Res 26(5):209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellouze E, Tahri N, Amar RB (2012) Enhancement of textile wastewater treatment process using nanofiltration. Desalination 286:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elmorsi TM, Riyad YM, Mohamed ZH, El Bary HMA (2010) Decolorization of Mordant red 73 azo dye in water using H 2 O 2/UV and photo-Fenton treatment. J Hazard Mater 174(1):352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fersi C, Dhahbi M (2008) Treatment of textile plant effluent by ultrafiltration and/or nanofiltration for water reuse. Desalination 222(1–3):263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer D, Li Y, Ahlemeyer B, Krieglstein J, Kissel T (2003) In vitro cytotoxicity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysis. Biomaterials 24(7):1121–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gahlout M, Gupte S, Gupte A (2013) Optimization of culture condition for enhanced decolorization and degradation of azo dye reactive violet 1 with concomitant production of ligninolytic enzymes by Ganoderma cupreum AG-1. 3 Biotech 3(2):143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hadibarata T, Ayu Kristanti R (2012) Effect of environmental factors in the decolorization of Remazol Brilliant Blue R by Polyporus sp. S133. J Chil Chem Soc 57(2):1095–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayat H, Mahmood Q, Pervez A, Bhatti ZA, Baig SA (2015) Comparative decolorization of dyes in textile wastewater using biological and chemical treatment. Sep Purif Technol 154:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hunge YM, Mahadik MA, Kumbhar SS, Mohite VS, Rajpure KY, Deshpande NG et al. (2016) Visible light catalysis of methyl orange using nanostructured WO 3 thin films. Ceram Int 42(1):789–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jadhav JP, Phugare SS, Dhanve RS, Jadhav SB (2010) Rapid biodegradation and decolorization of Direct Orange 39 (Orange TGLL) by an isolated bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain BCH. Biodegradation 21(3):453–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Junnarkar N, Murty DS, Bhatt NS, Madamwar D (2006) Decolorization of diazo dye Direct Red 81 by a novel bacterial consortium. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22(2):163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karthikeyan S, Titus A, Gnanamani A, Mandal AB, Sekaran G (2011) Treatment of textile wastewater by homogeneous and heterogeneous Fenton oxidation processes. Desalination 281:438–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lade H, Govindwar S, Paul D (2015) Mineralization and detoxification of the carcinogenic azo dye Congo Red and real textile effluent by a polyurethane foam immobilized microbial consortium in an upflow column bioreactor. Int J Environ Res Pub Health 12(6):6894–6918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mane UV, Gurav PN, Deshmukh AM, Govindwar SP (2008) Degradation of textile dye reactive navy–blue Rx (Reactive blue–59) by an isolated Actinomycete Streptomyces krainskii SUK–5. Malays J Microbiol 4(2):1–5Google Scholar
  27. Matthews RS (1995) Artemia salina as a test organism for measuring superoxide-mediated toxicity. Free Rad Biol Med 18(5):919–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mora ES, Barojas EG, Rojas ER, González RS (2007) Morphological, optical and photocatalytic properties of TiO 2–Fe 2 O 3 multilayers. Solar Energ Mater Solar Cell 91(15):1412–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neoh CH, Lam CY, Lim CK, Yahya A, Bay HH, Ibrahim Z, Noor ZZ (2015) Biodecolorization of recalcitrant dye as the sole sourceof nutrition using Curvularia clavata NZ2 and decolorization ability of its crude enzymes. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(15):11669–11678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’mahony T, Guibal E, Tobin JM (2002) Reactive dye biosorption by Rhizopus arrhizus biomass. Enzyme Microb Technol 31(4):456–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oturkar CC, Patole MS, Gawai KR, Madamwar D (2013) Enzyme based cleavage strategy of Bacillus lentus BI377 in response to metabolism of azoic recalcitrant. Bioresour Technol 130:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plum A, Braun G, Rehorek A (2003) Process monitoring of anaerobic azo dye degradation by high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection continuously coupled to membrane filtration sampling modules. J Chromatogr A 987(1):395–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prasad AA, Rao KB (2013) Aerobic biodegradation of Azo dye by Bacillus cohnii MTCC 3616; an obligately alkaliphilic bacterium and toxicity evaluation of metabolites by different bioassay systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(16):7469–7481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rasheed T, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN, Hu H, Zhang X (2017) Reaction mechanism and degradation pathway of rhodamine 6G by photocatalytic treatment. Water, Air Soil Pollut 228(8):291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson T, McMullan G, Marchant R, Nigam P (2001) Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour Technol 77(3):247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Romero S, Blánquez P, Caminal G, Font X, Sarrà M, Gabarrell X, Vicent T (2006) Different approaches to improving the textile dye degradation capacity of Trametes versicolor. Biochem Eng J 31(1):42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharma A, Dutta RK (2015) Studies on the drastic improvement of photocatalytic degradation of acid orange-74 dye by TPPO capped CuO nanoparticles in tandem with suitable electron capturing agents. RSC Adv 5(54):43815–43823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sohrabi MR, Ghavami M (2008) Photocatalytic degradation of direct red 23 dye using UV/TiO 2: effect of operational parameters. J Hazard Mater 153(3):1235–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Türgay O, Ersöz G, Atalay S, Forss J, Welander U (2011) The treatment of azo dyes found in textile industry wastewater by anaerobic biological method and chemical oxidation. Sep Purif Technol 79(1):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang N, Liu S, Fu X, Xu YJ (2011) Synthesis of M@ TiO2 (M = Au, Pd, Pt) core–shell nanocomposites with tunable photoreactivity. J Phys Chem C 115(18):9136–9145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Bilal
    • 1
  • Tahir Rasheed
    • 2
  • Hafiz M. N. Iqbal
    • 3
  • Hongbo Hu
    • 1
    • 4
  • Wei Wang
    • 1
  • Xuehong Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.The School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Campus MonterreyMonterreyMexico
  4. 4.National Experimental Teaching Center for Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations