Skip to main content

Building Co-Management as a Process: Problem Solving Through Partnerships in Aboriginal Country, Australia

Abstract

Collaborative problem solving has increasingly become important in the face of the complexities in the management of resources, including protected areas. The strategy undertaken by Girringun Aboriginal Corporation in north tropical Queensland, Australia, for developing co-management demonstrates the potential for a problem solving approach involving sequential initiatives, as an alternative to the more familiar negotiated agreements for co-management. Our longitudinal case study focuses on the development of indigenous ranger units as a strategic mechanism for the involvement of traditional owners in managing their country in collaboration with government and other interested parties. This was followed by Australia’s first traditional use of marine resources agreement, and development of a multi-jurisdictional, land to sea, indigenous protected area. In using a relationship building approach to develop regional scale co-management, Girringun has been strengthening its capabilities as collaborator and regional service provider, thus, bringing customary decision-making structures into play to ‘care for country’. From this evolving process we have identified the key components of a relationship building strategy, ‘the pillars of co-management’. This approach includes learning-by-doing, the building of respect and rapport, sorting out responsibilities, practical engagement, and capacity-building.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Almany GR, Connolly SR, Heath DD, Hogan JD, Jones GP, McCook LJ, Mills M, Pressey RL, Williamson HD (2009) Connectivity, biodiversity conservation and the design of marine reserve networks for coral reefs. Coral Reefs 28:339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson KP, Ostrom E (2008) Analysing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Political Science 41:71–93

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (eds) (2007) Adaptive co-management. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berkes F (2007) Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:15188–15193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1692–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berkes F (2010) Devolution and natural resources governance: trends and future. Environmental Conservation 37:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bock E, Girringun Aboriginal Corporation (2006) Implementation of emergent co-management practice in the Girringun area, appendix 1. In: Robinson CJ, Ross H, Hockings M (eds) Development of co-operative management arrangements in the Great Barrier Reef: an adaptive management approach. CRC Reef Research technical report no. 55. CRC Reef Research, Townsville, p 79ff. http://www.reef.crc.org.au/publications/techreport/pdf/CRC%20Reef%20Tech%20Report%2055.pdf

  8. Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar MT, Kothari A, Renard Y (2004) Sharing power. Learning-by-doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. IIED and IUCN/CEESP, Cenesta

  9. Carlsson L, Berkes F (2005) Co-management: concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Colfer CJP (2005) The complex forest: communities, uncertainty, and adaptive collaborative management. Resources for the Future/CIFOR, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dobbs K (2007) A reef-wide framework for managing traditional use of marine resources in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  12. George M, Innes J, Ross H (2004) Managing sea country together: key issues for developing co-operative management for the GBRWHA. Technical report no. 50. CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville

  13. Girringun Aboriginal Corporation, Nursey-Bray M (2002) Girringun saltwater unit co-management proposal. Girringun Aboriginal Corporation, Cardwell

    Google Scholar 

  14. Izurieta AI (2007) Evaluation framework for collaborative management of protected areas: a cross-cultural case study in Queensland, Australia. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, the University of Queensland, Australia

  15. Izurieta A, Sithole B, Stacey N, Hunter-Xenie H, Campbell B, Donohoe P, Brown J, Wilson L (2011) Developing indicators for monitoring and evaluating joint management effectiveness in protected areas in the northern territory, Australia. Ecology and Society 16(3):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larcombe P, Woolfe JK (1999) Terrigenous sediments as influences upon holocene nearshore coral reefs, central Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 46(1):141–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCay BJ, Jentoft S (1996) From the bottom up: participatory issues in fisheries management. Society and Natural Resources 9(3):237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nursey-Bray M, Rist P, Girringun Aboriginal Corporation (2005). Sea country and tourism: Girringun Aboriginal corporation case study. In: Ross H, Innes J, George M, Gorman K (eds) Traditional owner aspirations towards co-operative management of the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area: community case studies. Technical report no. 56. CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville

  19. Nursey-Bray M, Rist P (2009) Co-management and protected area management: achieving effective management of a contested site, lessons from the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area (GBRWHA). Marine Policy 33:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robinson CJ, Ross H, Hockings M (2006) Development of co-operative management arrangements in the Great Barrier Reef: an adaptive management approach. CRC Reef Research technical report no. 55. CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville

  22. Ross H (1999) New ethos, new solutions: lessons from Washington’s co-operative environmental management agreements. Australian Indigenous Law Reporter 4:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ross H, Innes J (2005) A framework for designing co-operative management for the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. In: Merino L, Robson J (eds) Managing the commons: conservation of biodiversity. Instituto Nacional de Ecologia (INE), Secretario de medio ambiente y recursos naturales (SEMARNAT), the Ford foundation, Christensen fund and the consejo civil Mexicano para la silvicultura sostenible, A.C. (CCMSS), Mexico, pp 46–53

  24. Ross H, Buchy M, Proctor W (2002) Laying down the ladder: a typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management. The Australian Journal of Environmental Management 9(4):2005–2217

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ross H, Innes J, George M, Gorman K (2005) Traditional owner aspirations towards co-operative management of the Great Barrier Reef world heritage area: community case studies. Technical report no. 50. CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville

  26. Ross H, Grant C, Robinson CJ, Izurieta A, Smyth D, Rist P (2009) Co-management and indigenous protected areas in Australia: achievements and ways forward. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 16(4):242–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smyth D (2006) Indigenous protected areas in Australia. Parks 16:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wet Tropics Management Authority (2005) Wet Tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area regional agreement. Wet Tropics Management Authority, Cairns. www.wettropics.gov.au/rah/rah_pdf/regional_agreement.pdf

  29. Williams SE, Pearson RG, Walsh PJ (1996) Distributions and biodiversity of the terrestrial vertebrates of Australia’s wet tropics: a review of current knowledge. Pacific Conservation Biology 2:327–362

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zann LP (2000) The state of the marine environment report for Australia: technical summary. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zurba M (2009) Bringing local synthesis into governance and management systems: the Girringun TUMRA case in northern Queensland, Australia. The Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 39(4):179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zurba M (2010) How well is co-management working? Perspectives, partnerships and power sharing along the way to an indigenous protected area on Girringun country. A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Natural Resource Management. The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the TOs, Girringun Aboriginal corporation staff, government staff, research colleagues and all others who participated in the studies leading to this paper. The contributing studies were funded by the Co-operative Research Centre for Reef Research and Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (Ross and colleagues’ research); The University of Queensland and WWF (Izurieta research), Rigby and Endeavor foundations (Zurba research). We thank Rod Neilson of Girringun Aboriginal corporation for his assistance with mapping.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie Zurba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zurba, M., Ross, H., Izurieta, A. et al. Building Co-Management as a Process: Problem Solving Through Partnerships in Aboriginal Country, Australia. Environmental Management 49, 1130–1142 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9845-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Co-management
  • Partnerships
  • Capacity-building
  • Social learning
  • Indigenous lands
  • Protected areas
  • Institutions
  • Organizational development
  • Australia