Reoperation Because of Dissatisfaction with the Aesthetic Results of Gynecomastia Surgery: Technical Considerations

Abstract

Background

Gynecomastia is a common disease in male patients that is characterized by benign breast enlargement. Gynecomastia may involve fibroglandular tissue (FGT), supramammary fat tissue, and retromammary fat tissue (RMFT). Gynecomastia is usually treated surgically; however, some patients undergo reoperation because of dissatisfaction with the results of the first operation. This study aimed to analyze the breast conditions requiring reoperation and to identify factors requiring attention during the first gynecomastia surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 98 patients who underwent reoperation because of unsatisfactory esthetic outcomes from January 2014 to April 2020. According to the reasons for dissatisfaction, patients were divided into undercorrection and overcorrection groups. Patients with remnant breast tissue were assigned to the undercorrection group, while those in whom excess breast tissue was removed and was assigned to the overcorrection group.

Results

The undercorrection and overcorrection groups comprised 81 and 17 patients, respectively. In the undercorrection group, 49 (60.5%) patients had residual FGT and fat tissue necessitating simultaneous FGT excision and liposuction, while 32 (39.5%) patients had no residual FGT and were treated with liposuction only. In the overcorrection group, 13 (76.5%) patients had undergone excessive removal of RMFT at the inferolateral aspect of the pectoralis major muscle margin and were treated by autologous fat grafting.

Conclusions

The most common cause of undercorrection was incomplete FGT removal, and the most common cause of overcorrection was excessive RMFT removal. Complete FGT excision and proper RMFT preservation can reduce the reoperation rate after gynecomastia surgery.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based Medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Carlson HE (1980) Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 303:795–799

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Choi BS, Lee SR, Byun GY, Hwang SB, Koo BH (2017) The characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes of adolescent gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41:1011–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Narula HS, Carlson HE (2014) Gynaecomastia–pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10:684–698

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Johnson RE, Murad MH (2009) Gynecomastia: pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Mayo Clin Proc 84:1010–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Courtiss EH (1987) Gynecomastia: analysis of 159 patients and current recommendations for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:740–753

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hammond DC, Arnold JF, Simon AM, Capraro PA (2003) Combined use of ultrasonic liposuction with the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:891–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lee SR, Lee SG, Byun GY, Kim MJ, Koo BH (2018) Clinical characteristics of asymmetric bilateral gynecomastia: suggestion of desirable surgical method based on a single-institution experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42:708–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Blau M, Hazani R (2015) Correction of gynecomastia in body builders and patients with good physique. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:425–432

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zavlin D, Jubbal KT, Friedman JD, Echo A (2017) Complications and outcomes after gynecomastia surgery: analysis of 204 pediatric and 1583 adult cases from a national multi-center database. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41:761–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Webster JP (1946) Mastectomy for gynecomastia through a semicircular intra-areolar incision. Ann Surg 124:557–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lista F, Ahmad J (2008) Power-assisted liposuction and the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:740–747

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Prado AC, Castillo PF (2005) Minimal surgical access to treat gynecomastia with the use of a power-assisted arthroscopic-endoscopic cartilage shaver. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:939–942

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ohyama T, Takada A, Fujikawa M, Hosokawa K (1998) Endoscope-assisted transaxillary removal of glandular tissue in gynecomastia. Ann Plast Surg 40:62–64

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Qutob O, Elahi B, Garimella V, Ihsan N, Drew PJ (2010) Minimally invasive excision of gynaecomastia—a novel and effective surgical technique. Ann R Coll Surg Eng 92:198–200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ratnam BV (2009) A new classification and treatment protocol for gynecomastia. Aesthet Surg J 29:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lee SG, Park PJ, Lee SR, Koo BH, Byun GY, Kim MJ, Kang HJ, Kim SR, Oh BS, Lee YH (2019) Influence of postoperative finasteride therapy on recurrence of gynecomastia after mastectomy in men taking finasteride for alopecia. Am J Mens Health 13:1557988319871423

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fruhstorfer BH, Malata CM (2003) A systematic approach to the surgical treatment of gynaecomastia. Br J Plast Surg 56:237–246

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Morselli PG, Morellini A (2012) Breast reshaping in gynecomastia by the “pull-through technique”: considerations after 15 years. Eur J Plast Surg 35:365–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Beom Seok Oh and Young Hyun Lee from the Research Center of Damsoyu Hospital for assisting with the statistical analysis and organizing the data in the manuscript. We thank Hyejin Park for editing of this manuscript. We thank Kelly Zammit, BVSc, and Jane Charbonneau, DVM, from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanz.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Ryul Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest to declare regarding any of the products or devices mentioned in this report.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of our institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Damsoyu Hospital (DSY-2020-005).

Informed Consent

Informed consent is not required for this type of retrospective study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.R., Lee, S.G. Reoperation Because of Dissatisfaction with the Aesthetic Results of Gynecomastia Surgery: Technical Considerations. Aesth Plast Surg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02124-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gynecomastia
  • Mastectomy
  • Reoperation
  • Fibroglandular tissue
  • Retromammary fat