This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
- 1.
Xiao X, Ye L (2017) Efficacy and safety of scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):585–590
- 2.
Barili F, Parolari A, Kappetein PA et al (2018) Statistical primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 27(3):317–321
- 3.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–34
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, D., Pengfei, S. & Zhenyu, C. Comment on “Efficacy and Safety of Scarpa Fascia Preservation During Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 355–356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01415-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date: