Comment on “Efficacy and Safety of Scarpa Fascia Preservation During Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Xiao X, Ye L (2017) Efficacy and safety of scarpa fascia preservation during abdominoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthet Plast Surg 41(3):585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barili F, Parolari A, Kappetein PA et al (2018) Statistical primer: heterogeneity, random- or fixed-effects model analyses? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 27(3):317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Zhenyu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, D., Pengfei, S. & Zhenyu, C. Comment on “Efficacy and Safety of Scarpa Fascia Preservation During Abdominoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis”. Aesth Plast Surg 45, 355–356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01415-4

Download citation