Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 867–876 | Cite as

Lower Lateral Cartilage Cephalic Malposition: An Over-Diagnosed Entity

  • Farhad Hafezi
  • Bijan Naghibzadeh
  • Abbas Kazemi Ashtiani
Original Article Rhinoplasty
  • 201 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Lower lateral cartilage malposition is represented by anterior convexity of the lower lateral cartilage (LLC) dome with posterior pinch, as defined by Sheen and Constantian. This anatomic variation consists of cephalic, or upward and inward, rotation of lateral crura, particularly in bulbous tip patients. In most cases, “bulbous pinch” LLC is positioned toward the medial canthus, not laterally, so it is referred to as cephalic displacement. Accordingly, it is recommended to caudally displace cartilage in the majority of rhinoplasty cases in which variation is seen.

Objectives

The purpose of this paper is to measure the exact angle of lateral crura with fixed reference points on the face.

Methods

We drew and marked LLC contours and vertical/horizontal lines in 40 consecutive rhinoplasty cases. We then divided them into two groups: (1) bulbous pinch and (2) flat LLCs. The right- and left-sided LLC angles to midline and horizontal lines were measured and compared to assess whether there was any significant difference between the two subgroups.

Results

There was no significant difference between the angles of LLC rotation in the bulbous and flat LLCs groups, measured both vertically and horizontally.

Conclusion

Based on our findings, although cephalic malposition of LLCs may be present in some patients but in the majority of cases the etiology of nasal lateral wall pinching is not cephalic displacement of lateral crura but most probably is due, rather, to severe convexity of the posterior and lateral crura. According to our findings, cephalic malposition is an uncommon anatomic variation of LLCs that has been reported at high frequency (60–70% of their rhinoplasty cases). This finding may help to correct this deformity into a normal anatomic configuration.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Nasal tip LLC cephalic malposition Bulbous pinch 

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (M4 V 16840 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Sheen JH, Sheen AP (1998) Aesthetic rhinoplasty, vol II, 2nd edn. Quality Medical Publishing Inc, St. Louis, pp 989–992Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Constantian MB, Hanover NH (2005) The boxy nasal tip, the ball tip, and alar cartilage malposition: variations on a theme—a study in 200 consecutive primary and secondary rhinoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:268–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McKinney P (2000) Management of the bulbous nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:906–917CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rohrich RJ, Adams WP (2001) The boxy nasal tip: classification and management based on alar cartilage suturing techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1849–1863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flint PW, Haughey BH, Thomas Robbins K, Regan Thomas J, Niparko JK, Lund VJ, Lesperance MM Cummings otolaryngology—head and neck surgery, 6th edn. ISBN: 0323278205Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hafezi F, Naghibzadeh B, Nouhi AH (2010) Applied anatomy of the nasal lower lateral cartilage: a new finding. Aesthet Plast Surg 34:244–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamra ST (1993) Repositioning the lateral alar crus. Plast Reconstr Surg 92(7):1244–1253PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Toriumi DM, Asher SA (2015) Lateral crural repositioning for treatment of cephalic malposition. Fac Plast Surg Clin N Am 23(1):55–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2014.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rohrich RJ, Liu JH (2012) Defining the infratip lobule in rhinoplasty: anatomy, pathogenesis of abnormalities, and correction using an algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5):1148–1158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daniel RK (2004) The two essential elements for planning tip surgery in primary and secondary rhinoplasty: observations based on review of 100 consecutive patients (discussion). Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1582–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Çakır B, Doğan T, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK (2013) Rhinoplasty: surface aesthetics and surgical techniques. Aesthet Surg J 33(3):363–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Çakır B, Öreroğlu AR, Daniel RK (2014) Surface aesthetics in tip rhinoplasty: a step-by-step guide. Aesthet Surg J 34(6):941–955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ (1992) Correction of the pinched nasal tip with alar spreader grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 90:821–829CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gunter JP, Friedman RM (1997) Lateral crural strut graft: technique and clinical applications in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:943–952CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plastic Surgery Department, St. Fatima HospitalIran University of Medical Sciences and Burn Research CenterTehranIran
  2. 2.Loghman Hakim HospitalShahid Beheshty University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.St. Fatima HospitalIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations