Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 396–399 | Cite as

Mastopexy on Reconstructed Breast Following Massive Weight Loss: An Innovative Technique Using Dermo-Capsular Flaps

  • A. Cogliandro
  • M. Barone
  • G. Cassotta
  • R. Salzillo
  • P. Persichetti
Innovative Techniques Breast Surgery

Abstract

Background

We have developed a dermo-capsular flap mastopexy technique for patients who have experienced massive weight loss after breast reconstruction. The aim of this technique is to lift the inframammary fold, adequately cover the implant, and remove excess skin, elevating the breast and obtaining symmetry with the contralateral breast.

Methods

Between January 2014 and February 2017, we performed this technique on 20 women who were candidates for second-stage breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy. All patients had experienced substantial weight loss (> 15 kg) and presented with ptosis after first-stage reconstruction.

Results

There were 8 patients with bilateral reconstruction following bilateral mastectomy (4 with bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy). There were 12 patients with unilateral mastectomy, all with contralateral breast ptosis treated by augmentation via inverted-T mastopexy (n = 7) or crescent mastopexy (n = 5). The average lift of the nipple-areola complex was 5 cm (range 2–8 cm). The average follow-up was 12 months (range 4–36 months). Two patients had complications, including partial wound dehiscence (in a heavy smoker) and recurrence of breast asymmetry.

Conclusions

Implant breast reconstruction after massive weight loss is still possible even in the setting of thin, ptotic, and anelastic breast tissue. Our inverted-T dermo-capsular flap mastopexy technique for reconstructed breast is safe and effective with good outcomes and high patient satisfaction.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Keywords

Mastopexy Breast reconstruction Implant Expander tissue Capsular flap 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors do not have any commercial associations that might pose or create a conflict of interest with information presented in this communication. No intramural or extramural funding supported any aspect of this work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our University.

Informed Consent

Each patient provided written informed consent before the participation in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Barone M, Cogliandro A, Persichetti P (2017) BREAST-Q following breast reconstruction: analysis of breast perception and sexuality. Plast Reconstr Surg 139:1016–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Persichetti P, Langella M, Filoni A, Cagli B, Tenna S (2013) How to redefine the inframammary fold: the “slingshot” capsular flap. Ann Plast Surg 70:636–638CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gargano F, Ciminello F, Podda S, De Santis G (2009) Salvage of exposed breast implants using capsular flaps. Eplasty 17(9):e41Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandstetter M, Schoeller T, Pülzl P, Schubert H, Wechselberger G (2010) Capsular flap for coverage of an exposed implant after skin-sparring mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1388–1390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gargano F, Moloney D, Arnstein P (2002) Use of a capsular flap to prevent palpable wrinkling of implants. Br J Plast Surg 55:269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Imran D, Javaid M, Lewis D, Attar KH (2005) Capsular flap for correction of contour deformities of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:662–663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoch J, Stahlenbrecher A (2006) Bottoming out in augmentation mammaplasty-correction and prevention. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 38:233–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Silberstein E, Shoham Y, Krieger Y (2013) Capsular flap: new applications. Aesthetic Plast Surg 37:395–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bauder AR, Samra F, Kanchwala SK, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ, Wu LC (2017) Autologous breast reconstruction in the postbariatric patient population. Microsurgery 3 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dayicioglu D, Tugertimur B, Munzenmaier K, Khan M, Smith P, Murr M, Kumar A, Khakpour N (2016) Outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap after massive weight loss. Ann Plast Surg 76(Suppl 4):S286–S289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martinez CA, Walters JA III, Sato EA, Hall JJ, Boutros SG (2016) Deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstruction in patients with previous bariatric surgery: Is it safe and feasible? Ann Plast Surg 76:216–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Samra F, Bauder AR, Chin B, Taglienti A, Wes AM, Kanchwala SK, Serletti JM, Wu LC (2015) Autologous breast reconstruction in the post-bariatric patient population. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(4 Suppl):89–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery UnitCampus Bio-Medico University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations