Abstract
Avian duets performed in an exclusive territory have been studied intensively. By contrast, only a few studies have been conducted on duets with multi-modal displays performed within a fission–fusion flock in which individuals can participate in face-to-face social interactions. Here, we examined the duet displays (DDs) of the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis), an endangered species in Japan, in a wintering flock in which individuals gathered for artificially provisioned foods. We tested two hypotheses: that DDs function as a signal of joint resource defence and for pair bond maintenance. Our behavioural analyses showed that the total frequency of DDs within a flock was positively associated with the number of joining cranes. This result indicated that the change in within-flock competition positively affected DD performance because an increase in flock size can reduce the per capita gain of resources. At the individual level, pairs accompanying their young (families) performed DDs more frequently than pairs that did not have their young. To care for their young, access to food resources is thought to be more important for pairs accompanying their young than pairs that did not have young. This result suggests that the DDs reflected the motivation to compete for resources. The performance of DDs increased the probability of staying in a favourable area. These results support the hypothesis that DDs function as a signal of joint resource defence in the flock. This study provides rare data on the function of coordinated vocal displays within a flock of birds.
Significance statement
Crane pairs perform duet displays (DDs) in a wintering flock. We mainly tested the hypothesis that DDs function as a joint resource defence signal. The change of overall competition positively affected the frequency of DDs, and the performance of DDs reflected the motivation to access food. The frequency of DDs was positively associated with the success of the food defence. This study provides rare data on the function of coordinated vocal displays within a group of birds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso JC, Bautista LM, Alonso JA (2004) Family-based territoriality vs flocking in wintering common cranes Grus grus. J Avian Biol 35:434–444
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266
Arrowood PC (1988) Duetting, pair bonding and agonistic display in parakeet pairs. Behaviour 106:129–157
Aureli F, Shaffner C, Boesch C et al (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr Anthropol 49:627–654
Baldassarre DT, Greig EI, Webster MS (2016) The couple that sings together stays together: duetting, aggression and extra-pair paternity in a promiscuous bird species. Biol Lett 12:20151025
BirdLife International (2013) Grus japonensis. The IUCN red list of threatened species. version 2014.2, www.iucnredlist.org
Black JM (1996) Partnerships in birds: the study of monogamy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication, 2nd edn. Sinauer, Sunderland
Caselli CB, Mennill DJ, Gestich CC, Setz EZ, Bicca-Marques JC (2015) Playback responses of socially monogamous black-fronted titi monkeys to simulated solitary and paired intruders. Am J Primatol 77:1135–1142
Dahlin CR, Benedict L (2014) Angry birds need not apply: a perspective on the flexible form and multifunctionality of avian vocal duets. Ethology 120:1–10
Dobler S, Heller KG, von Helversen O (1994) Song pattern recognition and an auditory time window in the female bushcricket Ancistrura nigrovittata (Orthoptera: Phaneropteridae). J Comp Physiol A 175:67–74
Ellis DE, Swengel SR, Archibald GW, Kepler CB (1998) A sociogram for the cranes of the world. Behav Process 43:125–151
Freckleton RP (2011) Dealing with collinearity in behavioural and ecological data: model averaging and the problems of measurement error. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1045-6
Hall ML (2000) The function of duetting in magpie-larks: conflict, cooperation, or commitment? Anim Behav 60:667–677
Hall ML (2004) A review of hypotheses for the functions of avian duetting. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:415–430
Hall ML (2009) A review of vocal duetting in birds. Adv Stud Behav 40:67–121
Johnsgard PA (1983) Cranes of the world. University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Klenova AV, Volodin IA, Volodina EV (2008) Duet structure provides information about pair identity in the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis). J Ethol 26:317–325
Kraaijeveld K, Mulder RA (2002) The function of triumph ceremonies in the black swan. Behaviour 139:45–54
Logue DM (2005) Cooperative defence in duet singing birds. Cogn Brain Behav 9:497–510
Logue DM (2007) Duetting in space: a radio-telemetry study of the black-bellied wren. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:3005–3010
Marshall-Ball L, Mann N, Slater PJB (2006) Multiple functions to duet singing: hidden conflicts and apparent cooperation. Anim Behav 71:823–831
Martin PR, Bateson PPG (2007) Measuring behaviour: an introductory guide, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Masatomi H, Kitagawa T (1974) Bionomics and sociology of Tancho or the Japanese crane, Grus japonensis, I. Distribution, habitat and outline of annual cycle. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Seri VI Zool 19:777–802
Masatomi H, Kitagawa T (1975) Bionomics and sociology of Tancho or the Japanese crane, Grus japonensis, II. Ethogram. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser VI Zool 19:834–878
Masatomi H, Masatomi Y (2009) Promoting the coexistence of humans and Tancho in Japan. Jpn J Conserv Ecol 14:223–242 (In Japanese with an English abstract)
Masatomi H, Koga K, Matsumoto F, Tmiyama N (1999) Frequency of unison-calls among flocks of the Tancho at the wintering feeding stations. J Env Sc Lab Senshu Univ 6:399–410
Mennill DJ, Vehrencamp SL (2008) Context-dependent functions of avian duets revealed by microphone-array recordings and multispeaker playback. Curr Biol 18:1314–1319
O’Brien RM (2007) A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant 41:673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
R Development Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org
Silk MJ, Croft DP, Tregenza T, Bearhop S (2014) The importance of fission–fusion social group dynamics in birds. Ibis 156:701–715
Takeda K (2012) Individual dependence on a feeding station in the red-crowned crane. China Crane News 16:18–20
Takeda KF, Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M, Kutsukake N (2015) Arch displays signal threat intentions in a fission–fusion flock of the red-crowned crane. Behaviour 152:1779–1179
Wickler W, Seibt U (1980) Vocal dueting and the pair bond. Ethology 52:217–226
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Momose, Y. Momose, Y. Masatomi and F. Matsumoto (the Red-Crowned Crane Conservancy) for kindly support of the fieldwork, the banding research data and valuable advice. We also thank the Akan International Crane Center for providing access to the ideal observation site. We are grateful to the two reviewers and the editor for valuable comments.
Funding
This study was supported by the Cooperation Research Program of Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical statement
All observation protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committees at The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) and adhered to the Guidelines for the Use of Animals of the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour/Animal Behavior Society. This research was performed with permission from the Akan International Crane Center.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by E. Fernandez-Juricic
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary video 1
(MOV 101906 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Takeda, K.F., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. & Kutsukake, N. Duet displays within a flock function as a joint resource defence signal in the red-crowned crane. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2485-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2485-7