Advertisement

Predictors of contest outcome in males of two subspecies of Gallotia galloti (Squamata: Lacertidae)

  • M. L. Bohórquez-Alonso
  • G. Mesa-Avila
  • M. Suárez-Rancel
  • E. Font
  • M. Molina-Borja
Original Article

Abstract

In many species, male coloration signals aggressiveness and/or fighting ability. Males of the Tenerife lizard (Gallotia galloti) have conspicuous ultraviolet (UV)-blue cheek and lateral color patches that are brighter in the breeding season and larger than those of females. We analyzed experimentally the effect of morphological and behavioral traits, including spectral variables from UV-reflecting color patches, on the outcome of staged dyadic contests between males of two subspecies of G. galloti. We performed two experiments: (1) using pairs of unmanipulated males and (2) reducing the UV reflectance of the UV-blue patches of one of the contestants with sunscreen lotion. Results from experiment 1 showed no significant difference between subspecies in the effect of any variable on contest outcome. Overall, winners had larger body mass, head width, and fore-limb length and showed a higher rate of aggressive behavior patterns than losers, whereas losers showed a higher rate of “tail shake,” which is considered a submissive behavior. Winners also had lateral UV-blue patches with higher (more blue-biased) hue than losers, but no other spectral trait had a significant effect on contest outcome. Results from experiment 2 showed that reducing patch reflectance in the UV range had no effect in one subspecies but significantly increased fighting success in the other. The probability of winning was positively associated with the frequency of bites (irrespective of whether individuals had manipulated patches or not). Results from both experiments suggest that while multiple traits (morphometric, coloration, and behavioral) may influence the outcome of male contests in G. galloti, behavioral traits take prevalence over morphological, including coloration, traits.

Significance statement

The effect of several traits on the outcome of contests has been previously analyzed in males of several lizard species. These analyses have commonly considered the effect of a single trait on contest outcome. However, as even males of the same age and experience often vary across multiple morphological (including coloration), performance, and behavioral traits, it has been suggested that contest outcome could be influenced by several interacting traits. We tested this hypothesis by staging dyadic contests between males of two subspecies of the Tenerife lizard. Results from a first experiment showed that larger body mass, head width, fore-limb lengths, higher frequency of bites, throat extension, and higher peak reflectance (hue) of UV-blue patches significantly affected the probability of winning, while a large frequency of tail shakes was associated with losing. Results from a second experiment, in which we experimentally manipulated patch UV reflectance in one of the contestant lizards, showed that bite frequency and reduction of UV reflectance affected the probability of winning; we discuss the complex effect of this latter trait on contest outcome.

Keywords

Lizard contests Patch coloration Ultraviolet reflectance Behavioral traits Gallotia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Guillem Pérez i de Lanuza for his help with visual modeling and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. We also thank the Consejería de Medio Ambiente of the Cabildo of Tenerife for the permit to collect animals.

Funding information

This work did not receive any funding.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

At the completion of the experiments, all the lizards were released unharmed at their original capture sites. During their stay in captivity, the animals were cared for in accordance with guidelines published by Animal Behaviour (ASAB/ABS 2012; Anim Behav 83:301–309); the research received official approval from the Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the University of La Laguna (reference CEIBA2011-0020).

Supplementary material

265_2018_2480_MOESM1_ESM.docx (31 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

References

  1. Abalos J, Pérez i de Lanuza G, Carazo P, Font E (2016) The role of male coloration in the outcome of staged contests in the European common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis). Behaviour 153:607–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alatalo RV, Gustafsson L, Lundberg A (1994) Male coloration and species recognition in sympatric flycatchers. Proc R Soc Lond B 256:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alonso-Alvarez C, Douterlant C, Sorci G (2004) Ultraviolet reflectance affects male-male interactions in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus ultramarinus). Behav Ecol 15:805–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badiane A, Perez i de Lanuza G, García-Custodio MC, Carazo P, Font E (2017) Colour patch size and measurement error using reflectance spectrophotometry. Methods Ecol Evol 8:1585–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baird TA (2014) Lizards and other reptiles as models for the study of contest behaviour. In: Hardy ICW, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 258–286Google Scholar
  6. Baird TA, Baird TD, Shine R (2013) Showing red: male coloration signals same-sex rivals in an Australian water dragon. Herpetologica 69:436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bajer K, Molnár O, Török J, Herczeg G (2010) Female European green lizards (Lacerta viridis) prefer males with high ultraviolet throat reflectance. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:2007–2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bajer K, Molnár O, Török J, Herczeg G (2011) Ultraviolet nuptial colour determines fight success in male European green lizards (Lacerta viridis). Biol Lett 7:866–868CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Balogová M, Uhrin M (2015) Sex-biased dorsal spotted patterns in the fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra). Salamandra 51:12–18Google Scholar
  10. Bauwens D, Nuijten K, van Wezel H, Verheyen RF (1987) Sex recognition by males of the lizard Lacerta vivipara: an introductory study. Amphibia-Reptilia 8:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bischoff W (1982) Die innerartliche Gliederung von Gallotia galloti (Duméril et Bibron 1839) (Reptilia: Sauria: Lacertidae) auf Teneriffa, Kanarische Inseln. Bonn Zool Beitr 33:363–382Google Scholar
  12. Blomberg SP, Owens IPF, Stuart-Fox D (2001) Ultraviolet reflectance in the small skink Carlia pectoralis. Herp Rev 32:16–17Google Scholar
  13. Bohórquez-Alonso ML, Molina-Borja M (2014) Sexual dichromatism of blue-UV patches varies along breeding months in Gallotia galloti (Squamata: Lacertidae). Biol J Linn Soc 113:556–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Carpenter GC (1995) Modelling dominance: the influence of size, coloration, and experience on dominance relations in tree lizards (Urosaurus ornatus). Herpetol Monogr 9:88–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper WE Jr, Greenberg N (1992) Reptilian coloration and behavior. In: Crews D, Gans C (eds) Biology of the Reptilia: physiology and behavior. E: hormones, brain and behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 298–422Google Scholar
  17. Cooper WE Jr, Vitt LJ (1988) Orange head coloration of the male broad-headed skink (Eumeces laticeps), a sexually selected social cue. Copeia 1988:1–6Google Scholar
  18. Cooper WE Jr, Vitt LJ (1989) Sexual dimorphism of head and body size in an iguanid lizard: paradoxical results. Am Nat 133:729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox SC, Carranza S, Brown RP (2010) Divergence times and colonization of the Canary Islands by Gallotia lizards. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56:747–757CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cuadrado M (2000) Body colors indicate the reproductive status of female common chameleons: experimental evidence for the intersex communication function. Ethology 106:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cuthill IC, Bennett ATD, Partridge JC, Maier E (1999) Plumage reflectance and the objective measurement of avian sexual dimorphism. Am Nat 160:183–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delhey K, Peters A (2008) Quantifying variability of avian colours: are signalling traits more variable? PLoS One 3:e1689CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleishman LJ, Bowman M, Saunders D, Miller WE, Rury MJ, Loew ER (1997) The visual ecology of Puerto Rican anoline lizards: habitat light and spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol A 181:446–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleishman LJ, Loew ER, Whiting MJ (2011) High sensitivity to short wavelengths in a lizard and implications for understanding the evolution of visual systems in lizards. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2891–2899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Font E, Pérez i de Lanuza G, Sampedro C (2009) Ultraviolet reflectance and cryptic sexual dichromatism in the ocellated lizard, Lacerta (Timon) lepida (Squamata: Lacertidae). Biol J Linn Soc 97:766–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. García C, Perera TB (2002) Ultraviolet-based female preferences in a viviparous fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton DG, Whiting MJ, Pryke SR (2013) Fiery frills: carotenoid-based coloration predicts contest success in frillneck lizards. Behav Ecol 24:1138–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hews D (1990) Examining hypotheses generated by field measures of sexual selection on male lizards. Evolution 44:1956–1966CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Huyghe K, Vanhooydonck B, Scheers H, Molina-Borja M, Van Damme R (2005) Morphology, performance and fighting capacity in male lizards, Gallotia galloti. Funct Ecol 19:800–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. LeBas NR, Marshall NJ (2000) The role of colour in signalling and male choice in the agamid lizard Ctenophorus ornatus. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:445–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loew ER, Fleishman LJ, Foster RG, Provencio I (2002) Visual pigments and oil droplets in diurnal lizards: a comparative study of Caribbean anoles. J Exp Biol 205:927–938PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Maia R, Eliason CM, Bitton PP, Doucet SM, Shawkey MD (2013) Pavo: an R package for the analysis, visualization and organization of spectral data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:906–913Google Scholar
  33. Marshall KLA, Stevens M (2014) Wall lizards display conspicuous signals to conspecifics and reduce detection by avian predators. Behav Ecol 25:1325–1337CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin M, Meylan S, Gómez D, Le Galliard JF (2013) Ultraviolet and carotenoid-based colouration in the common lizard Zootoca vivipara (Squamata: Lacertidae) in relation to age, sex, and morphology. Biol J Linn Soc 110:128–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin M, Le Galliard JF, Meylan S, Loew ER (2015a) The importance of short and near infrared wavelength sensitivity for visual discrimination in two species of lacertid lizards. J Exp Biol 218:458–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin M, Meylan S, Perret S, Le Galliard JF (2015b) The UV coloration influences spatial dominance but not agonistic behaviors in male wall lizards. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1483–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martins EP, Lacy KE (2004) Complex behavior and ecology in rock iguanas. I. Evidence for an appeasement display. In: Alberts A, Carter R, Hayes W, Martins E (eds) Biology and conservation of iguanas. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 101–108Google Scholar
  38. McGregor HE, While GM, Barrett J, Perez i de Lanuza G, Carazo P, Michaelides S, Uller T (2017) Experimental contact zones reveal causes and targets of sexual selection in hybridizing lizards. Funct Ecol 31:742–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McLean CA, Stuart-Fox D (2015) Rival assessment and comparison of morphological and performance-based predictors of fighting ability in Lake Eyre dragon lizards, Ctenophorus maculosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Molina-Borja M (2002) Comportamiento agresivo y selección intrasexual en lagartos. El caso de Gallotia. Rev Esp Herpetol 2002:39–48Google Scholar
  41. Molina-Borja M, Rodríguez-Domínguez MA (2004) Evolution of biometric and life-history traits in lizards (Gallotia) from the Canary Islands. J Zool Syst Evol Res 42:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Molina-Borja M, Padrón-Fumero M, Alfonso-Martín MT (1997) Intrapopulation variability in morphology, coloration, and body size in two races of the lacertid lizard, Gallotia galloti. J Herpetol 31:499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Molina-Borja M, Padron-Fumero M, Alfonso-Martin T (1998) Morphological and behavioural traits affecting the intensity and outcome of male contests in Gallotia galloti galloti (Family Lacertidae). Ethology 104:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Molina-Borja M, Font E, Mesa Avila G (2006) Sex and population variation in ultraviolet reflectance of colour patches in Gallotia galloti (Fam. Lacertidae) from Tenerife (Canary Islands). J Zool 268:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Olsson M (1994) Nuptial coloration in the sand lizard, Lacerta agilis: an intra-sexually selected cue to fighting ability. Anim Behav 48:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Olsson M, Andersson S, Wapstra E (2011) UV-deprived coloration reduces success in mate acquisition in male sand lizards (Lacerta agilis). PLoS One 6:e19360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Olsson M, Stuart-Fox D, Ballen C (2013) Genetics and evolution of colour patterns in reptiles. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24:529–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pérez i de Lanuza G, Font E (2007) Ultraviolet reflectance of male nuptial colouration in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) from the Pyrenees. Amphibia-Reptilia 28:438–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pérez i de Lanuza G, Font E (2014) Ultraviolet vision in lacertid lizards: evidence from retinal structure, eye transmittance, SWS1 visual pigment genes and behaviour. J Exp Biol 217:2899–2909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Pérez i de Lanuza G, Font E (2015) Differences in conspicuousness between alternative color morphs in a polychromatic lizard. Behav Ecol 26:1432–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pérez i de Lanuza G, Carazo P, Font E (2014) Colours of quality: structural (but not pigment) coloration informs about male quality in a polychromatic lizard. Anim Behav 90:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Quinn VS, Hews DK (2000) Signals and behavioural responses are not coupled in males: aggression affected by replacement of an evolutionarily lost colour signal. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:755–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  54. Richard M, Thorpe R (2001) Can microsatellites be used be used to infer phylogenies? Evidence from population affinities of the Western Canary Island lizard (Gallotia galloti). Mol Phylogenet Evol 20:351–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Richards SA, Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA (2011) Model selection and model averaging in behavioural ecology: the utility of the IT-AIC framework. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith S, Örnborg J, Sendecka J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Siddiqi A, Cronin TW, Loew ER, Vorobyev M, Summers K (2004) Interspecific and intraspecific views of color signals in the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio. J Exp Biol 207:2471–2485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Siitari H, Huhta E (2002) Individual color variation and male quality in pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca): a role of ultraviolet reflectance. Behav Ecol 13:737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Simon VB (2011) Communication signal rates predict interaction outcome in the brown anole lizard, Anolis sagrei. Copeia 2011:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Stapley J, Whiting MJ (2006) Ultraviolet signals fighting ability in a lizard. Biol Lett 2:169–172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Steffen JE, Guyer CC (2014) Display behaviour and dewlap colour as predictors of contest success in brown anoles. Biol J Linn Soc 111:646–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stuart-Fox DM, Johnston G (2005) Experience overrides colour in lizard contests. Behaviour 142:329–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stuart-Fox DM, Ord TJ (2004) Sexual selection, natural selection and the evolution of dimorphic coloration and ornamentation in agamid lizards. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:2249–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stuart-Fox DM, Firth D, Moussalli A, Whiting MJ (2006) Multiple signals in chameleon contests: designing and analysing animal contests as a tournament. Anim Behav 71:1263–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thompson CW, Moore MC (1991) Throat colour reliably signals status in male tree lizards, Urosaurus ornatus. Anim Behav 42:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thorpe RS, Richard M (2001) Evidence that ultraviolet markings are associated with patterns of molecular gene flow. P Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3929–3934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Umbers KDL, Osborne L, Keogh JS (2012) The effects of residency and body size on contest initiation and outcome in the territorial dragon, Ctenophorus decresii. PLoS One 7:e47143CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Vedder O, Schut E, Magrath MJL, Komdeur J (2010) Ultraviolet crown colouration affects contest outcomes among male blue tits, but only in the absence of prior encounters. Funct Ecol 24:417–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vorobyev M, Osorio D (1998) Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Whiting MJ, Stuart-Fox DM, O’Connor D, Firth D, Bennett NC, Blomberg SP (2006) Ultraviolet signals ultra-aggression in a lizard. Anim Behav 72:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Xu M, Fincke OM (2015) Ultraviolet wing signal affects territorial contest outcome in a sexually dimorphic damselfly. Anim Behav 101:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yewers MSC, Pryke S, Stuart-Fox DM (2016) Behavioural differences across contexts may indicate morph-specific strategies in the lizard Ctenophorus decresii. Anim Behav 111:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zucker N (1994) A dual status-signalling system: a matter of redundancy or different roles? Anim Behav 47:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. Bohórquez-Alonso
    • 1
  • G. Mesa-Avila
    • 1
  • M. Suárez-Rancel
    • 2
  • E. Font
    • 3
  • M. Molina-Borja
    • 1
  1. 1.Grupo de Investigación “Etología y Ecología del Comportamiento”, Departamento de Biología Animal, Sección de Biología, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de La LagunaTenerifeSpain
  2. 2.Depto. de Matemáticas, Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Sección Matemáticas, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de La LagunaTenerifeSpain
  3. 3.Lab. Etología, Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología EvolutivaUniv. ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations