Cue-conflict experiments between magnetic and visual cues in dunlin Calidris alpina and curlew sandpiper Calidris ferruginea
Despite our extensive knowledge on various aspects of their lives, there has been limited investigation into the hierarchical relationships among different compass systems in shorebirds. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between magnetic and celestial compasses in two species of shorebirds, the curlew sandpiper (Calidris ferruginea; pre-breeding migration) and the dunlin (Calidris alpina; post-breeding migration) using cue-conflict experiments. Birds were captured in a Mediterranean stopover site, after which their magnetic orientation was determined under simulated overcast conditions at sunset using modified Emlen funnels fitted with infrared video cameras. Birds that demonstrated a well-defined directional preference were then exposed over two sunsets to conflicting directional information between the local geomagnetic field and the ±90° shifted band of maximum polarisation. These individuals were tested again for magnetic orientation at sunset in the same conditions as previous test, to determine whether their directional choices had changed after the cue-conflict. Our results showed that individuals from both species did not recalibrate their magnetic compass from visual cues after the cue-conflict, even though at least dunlins did not appear to completely disregard the information derived from celestial cues. This study is one of the few experimental studies on the migratory orientation of Charadriiformes and on the hierarchical relationships between the different compasses used by these birds during their extensive migratory movements.
Migrating birds are able to use different compass mechanisms based on geomagnetic or celestial cues, and it seems reasonable to hypothesise that birds calibrate their various compasses to maintain the correct direction especially when the directional information does not agree. The hierarchy among different compasses has been studied largely on night migrating passerines, but it is still poorly understood. We investigated the hierarchy among geomagnetic and celestial cues (band of maximum polarisation) in two species of Charadriiformes by means of cue-conflict experiments. Our result showed that the geomagnetic cues have a dominant role in the orientation mechanisms of the studied species, even though the information derived from celestial cues did not appear to be completely disregarded.
KeywordsOrientation Cue-conflict Polarised light Shorebirds Magnetic compass
We would like to thank all the people who helped us in the field: F. Chini, S. Formento, M. Ricciardi, S. Pardini, S. Volpi, all the ringers working in the ringing station of the “Osservatorio F. Caterini” in San Rossore and in particular R. Gambogi and A. Galardini. The comments of three anonymous reviewers greatly improved an earlier draft of the manuscript. This paper have been submitted to ProofReading-Service.com for editing and proofreading.
Compliance with ethical standards
All protocols performed in studies involving animals comply with the ethical standards and Italian laws on animal welfare. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Italian Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA).
This study was partly funded by the Italian Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR - PRIN 20083ML4XC).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Able KP, Able MA (1990) Calibration of the magnetic compass of a migratory bird by celestial rotation. Nature 347:378–380Google Scholar
- Agostinelli C, Lund U (2013) R package “circular”: Circular Statistics (version 0.4-7), https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/circular/
- Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Colwell MA (2010) Shorebird ecology, conservation, and management. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Cramp S, Simmons KEL (1983) The birds of the western Palearctic, vol III. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Delany S, Scott D, Helmink ATF, Dodman T, Flink S, Stroud D, Haanstra L (2009) An atlas of wader populations in Africa and western Eurasia. Wetlands International, WageningenGoogle Scholar
- del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J (1996) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 3. Lynx Ediction, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
- Kramer G (1953) Die Sonnenorientierung der Vögel. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 1:77–84Google Scholar
- Piersma T (1987) Hop, skip, or jump? Constraints on migration of Arctic waders by feeding, fattening, and flight speed. Limosa 60:185–191Google Scholar
- Piersma T, Zwarts L, Bruggemann JH (1990) Behavioural aspects of the departure of waders before long-distance flights: flocking, vocalizations, flight paths and diurnal timing. Ardea 78:157–184Google Scholar
- Prater AJ, Merchant JH, Vuorinen J (1977) Guide to the identification and ageing of Holarctic shorebirds. BTO, TringGoogle Scholar
- Sauer EF (1963) Migration habits of golden plovers. In: Sibley CG (ed) Proc 13 Int Ornithol Congr. Allan Press, Lawrence, pp 454–467Google Scholar
- Scebba S, Moschetti G (2006) Migration patterns and fat reserves of curlew sandpiper Calidris ferruginea at a stopover site in southern Italy. Int Wader Stud 19:138–143Google Scholar
- Spina F, Volponi S (2008) Atlante delle migrazioni in Italia. Ministero dell’ambiente e della tutela del territorio e del mare ISPRA, RomaGoogle Scholar
- Wilson JR, Czajkowski MA, Pienkowski MW (1980) The migration through Europe and wintering in West Africa of curlew sandpipers. Wild 31:107–122Google Scholar
- Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W (1999) Celestial and magnetic cues in experimental conflict. In: Adams NJ, Slotow RH (eds) Proc 22 Int Ornithol Congr, Durban. BirdLife South Africa, Johannesburg, pp 988–1004Google Scholar