Egg pecking and puncturing behaviors in shiny and screaming cowbirds: effects of eggshell strength and degree of clutch completion

  • Natalia A. Cossa
  • Diego T. Tuero
  • Juan C. Reboreda
  • Vanina D. Fiorini
Original Article

Abstract

Shiny cowbirds (Molothrus bonariensis) are generalist brood parasites that use hosts varying in body and egg size. On the contrary, screaming cowbirds (M. rufoaxillaris), which are larger than shiny cowbirds, are host specialist that use mainly one host of similar body and egg size. Both parasites peck and puncture eggs when visiting nests. Through puncturing eggs, cowbirds can reduce the competition for food their chicks face (reduction of competition hypothesis), but the same behavior could also be a mechanism to enforce host to renest when nests are found late in the nesting cycle (farming hypothesis). Eggshell strength increases the difficulty to puncture eggs and therefore may modulate egg-pecking behavior. To test these hypotheses, we studied the effect of the degree of clutch completion and egg size on egg-puncturing behavior. Moreover, we evaluated if morphological differences between cowbird species and eggshell strength affected egg-pecking behavior. We presented captive females a nest with complete (four eggs) or incomplete (one egg) clutches of house wren (small egg size, low eggshell strength), chalk-browed mockingbird (large egg size, intermediate eggshell strength), or shiny cowbird (medium egg size, high eggshell strength). The proportion of nests with punctured eggs was similar for complete and incomplete clutches. Cowbirds punctured more eggs in complete than in incomplete clutches, but in complete clutches, they did not destroy the entire clutch. There were no differences in the egg-pecking behavior between cowbird species, which pecked more frequently the eggs with the strongest eggshell. Our findings are consistent with the reduction of competition hypothesis.

Significance statement

Brood parasitic birds do not build nests and raise their chicks. Instead, they lay eggs in nests of other species (hosts), which carry out all parental care. Some brood parasites, like the cowbirds, peck and puncture eggs when they visit host nests. This behavior may help to reduce the competition for food that their chicks face in the nest (reduction of competition hypothesis) or may enforce hosts to renest (farming hypothesis). We experimentally studied egg-pecking and egg-puncturing behaviors in the host generalist shiny cowbird and the host specialist screaming cowbird. We found that the degree of clutch completion and egg size modulate egg-puncturing behavior and eggshell strength modulates egg-pecking behavior. Our results indicate that by puncturing eggs, cowbirds reduce nest competition.

Keywords

Brood parasitism Farming hypothesis Molothrus bonariensis Molothrus rufoaxillaris Reduction of competition hypothesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank “Elsa Shaw de Pearson Foundation” for supporting our fieldwork at Reserva El Destino. We are grateful to Brian Peer for thoughtful comments that contributed to the improvement of the manuscript. We also thank three anonymous referees and Manuel Soler who provided their helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript. This work was supported by grants of the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica and the University of Buenos Aires. DTT, JCR, and VDF are research fellows of Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted. All work complied with the Argentinean Law for the Conservation of Wild Fauna (Ley Nacional de Fauna 22421/81) and was conducted with the authorization from the Organismo Provincial de Desarrollo Sostenible, Argentina (Permit number 202/12-O.P.D.S.).

Supplementary material

265_2017_2289_MOESM1_ESM.mp4 (35.2 mb)
ESM 1 Video of shiny cowbird female pecking one shiny cowbird egg (MP4 36,078 kb).

References

  1. Arcese P, Smith JN, James NM, Hatch MI (1996) Nest predation by cowbirds and its consequences for passerine demography. P Natl Acad Sci USA 93:4608–4611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astié AA, Reboreda JC (2009) Function of egg punctures by shiny cowbird in parasitized and unparasitized creamy-bellied thrush nests. J Field Ornithol 80:336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BirdLife International and Handbook of the Birds of the World (2016) Molothrus bonariensis and Molothrus rufoaxillaris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2016–3, http://maps.iucnredlist.org/map.html?id=22724345, http://maps.iucnredlist.org/map.html?id=22724342
  4. Carter MD (1986) The parasitic behavior of the bronzed cowbird Molothrus aeneus in south Texas USA. Condor 88:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. T. & A.D, PoyserGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies NB, Brooke MDL (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptations. Anim Behav 36:262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Mársico MC, Reboreda JC (2008) Egg-laying behavior in screaming cowbirds: why does a specialist brood parasite waste so many eggs? Condor 110:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Mársico MC, Reboreda JC (2010) Brood parasitism increases mortality of bay-winged cowbird nests. Condor 112:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Mársico MC, Reboreda JC (2014) High frequency but low impact of brood parasitism by the specialist screaming cowbird on its primary host, the baywing. Emu 114:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Giacomo AG, Reboreda JC (2015) Reproductive success of the specialist brood parasite screaming cowbird in an alternative host, the chopi blackbird. Auk 132:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Domínguez M, de la Colina MA, Di Giacomo AG, Reboreda JC, Mahler B (2015) Host switching in cowbird brood parasites: how often does it occur? J Evol Biol 28:1290–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubina KM, Peer BD (2013) Egg pecking and discrimination by female and male brown-headed cowbirds. J Ornithol 154:553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC (2006) Cues used by shiny cowbirds (Molothrus bonariensis) to locate and parasitise chalk-browed mockingbird (Mimus saturninus) nests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiorini VD, Tuero DT, Reboreda JC (2009) Shiny cowbirds synchronize parasitism with host laying and puncture host eggs according to host characteristics. Anim Behav 77:561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiorini VD, Gloag R, Reboreda JC, Kacelnik A (2014) Strategic egg destruction by brood parasitic cowbirds? Anim Behav 93:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fraga RM (1983) The eggs of the parasitic screaming cowbird (Molothrus rufoaxillaris) and its host, the bay-winged cowbird (M. badius): is there evidence for mimicry? J Ornithol 124:187–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraga RM (1998) Interactions of the parasitic screaming and shiny cowbirds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris and M. bonariensis) with a shared host, the bay-winged cowbird (M. badius). In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts: studies in coevolution. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 173–193Google Scholar
  18. Gloag R, Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC, Kacelnik A (2012) The economics of nestmate-killing in avian brood parasites: a provisions trade-off. Behav Ecol 23:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gloag R, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC, Kacelnik A (2013) The wages of violence: mobbing by mockingbirds as a frontline defence against brood parasitic cowbirds. Anim Behav 86:1023–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gloag R, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC, Kacelnik A (2014) Shiny cowbirds share foster mothers but not true mothers in multiply parasitized mockingbird nests. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. GraphPad Software Inc (2007) GraphPad Prism, version 6.02. GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/
  22. Hoover JP, Robinson SK (2007) Retaliatory mafia behavior by a parasitic cowbird favors host acceptance of parasitic eggs. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4479–4483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoy G, Ottow J (1964) Biological and oological studies of the molothrine cowbirds (Icteridae) of Argentina. Auk 81:186–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jaramillo A, Burke P (1999) New world blackbirds: the icterids. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Lanyon SM (1992) Interspecific brood parasitism in blackbirds (Icterinae): a phylogenetic perspective. Science 255:77–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Logan M (2010) Biostatistical design and analysis using R: a practical guide. Wiley, West SussexCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. López A (2013) Comparative analysis of the eggshell characteristics of the parasitic species (genus Molothrus) and their main hosts. Undergraduate thesis, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowther PE (2016) Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds. The Field Museum, https://www.fieldmuseum.org/sites/default/files/plowther/2014/09/24/cowbird_hosts-17sep2014.pdf
  29. Mahler B, Confalonieri VA, Lovette IJ, Reboreda JC (2007) Partial host fidelity in nest selection by the shiny cowbird (Molothrus bonariensis), a highly generalist avian brood parasite. J Evol Biol 20:1918–1923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason P (1986a) Brood parasitism in a host generalist, the shiny cowbird: I. The quality of different species as hosts. Auk 103:52–60Google Scholar
  31. Mason P (1986b) Brood parasitism in a host generalist, the shiny cowbird: II. Host selection. Auk 103:61–69Google Scholar
  32. Massoni V, Reboreda JC (1998) Costs of brood parasitism and the lack of defenses on the yellow-winged blackbird-shiny cowbird system. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Massoni V, Reboreda JC (1999) Egg puncture allows shiny cowbirds to assess host egg development and suitability for parasitism. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1871–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mermoz ME, Fernández GJ (2003) Breeding success of a specialist brood parasite, the screaming cowbird, parasitizing an alternative host. Condor 105:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mermoz ME, Ornelas JF (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of life-history adaptations in parasitic cowbirds. Behav Ecol 15:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakamura TK, Cruz A (2000) The ecology of egg-puncture behaviour by shiny cowbird in southwestern Puerto Rico. In: Smith JNM, Cook TL, Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, Sealy SG (eds) Ecology and management of cowbirds and their hosts: studies in the conservation of North American passerine birds. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 178–186Google Scholar
  37. Ortega C (1998) Cowbirds and other brood parasites. The University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  38. Peer BD (2006) Egg destruction and egg removal by avian brood parasites: adaptiveness and consequences. Auk 123:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peer BD, Bollinger EK (1997) Explanations for the infrequent cowbird parasitism on common grackles. Condor 99:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peer BD, Bollinger EK (2000) Why do female brown-headed cowbirds remove host eggs? A test of the incubation efficiency hypothesis. In: Smith JNM, Cook TL, Rothstein SI, Robinson SK, Sealy SG, Ehrlich PR (eds) Ecology and management of cowbirds and their hosts: studies in the conservation of North American passerine birds. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 187–192Google Scholar
  41. Peer BD, Sealy SG (1999) Parasitism and egg puncture behaviour by bronzed and brown-headed cowbirds in sympatry. Stud Avian Biol 18:235–240Google Scholar
  42. Picman J (1989) Mechanism of increased puncture resistance of eggs of brown-headed cowbirds. Auk 106:577–583Google Scholar
  43. Picman J, Pribil S (1997) Is greater eggshell density an alternative mechanism by which parasitic cuckoos increase the strength of their eggs? J Ornithol 138:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R Development Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.r-project.org Google Scholar
  45. Reboreda JC, Clayton NS, Kacelnik A (1996) Species and sex differences in hippocampus size between parasitic and non-parasitic cowbirds. Neuroreport 7:505–508CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rothstein SI (1982) Successes and failures in avian egg and nestling recognition with comments on the utility of optimality reasoning. Am Zool 22:547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sealy SG (1992) Removal of yellow warbler eggs in association with cowbird parasitism. Condor 94:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Servedio MR, Hauber MR (2006) To eject or to abandon? Life history traits of hosts and parasites interact to influence the fitness payoffs of alternative anti-parasite strategies. J Evol Biol 19:1585–1594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Skaug H, Fournier D, Bolker B, Magnusson A, Nielsen A (2014) Generalized linear mixed models using AD model builder. R package version 0.8.0, http://glmmadmb.r-forge.r-project.org/
  50. Soler M, Soler JJ, Martínez JG (1997) Great spotted cuckoos improve their reproductive success by damaging magpie host eggs. Anim Behav 54:1227–1233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Spottiswoode CN (2013) A brood parasite selects for its own egg traits. Biol Lett 9:20130573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Spottiswoode CN, Colebrook-Robjent JF (2007) Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic greater honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations. Behav Ecol 18:792–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swan DC, Zanette LY, Clinchy M (2015) Brood parasites manipulate their hosts: experimental evidence for the farming hypothesis. Anim Behav 105:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tuero DT (2010) Flexibilidad comportamental del Tordo Renegrido (Molothrus bonariensis) al parasitar diferentes hospedadores. PhD thesis, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  55. Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC (2007) Effects of shiny cowbird Molothrus bonariensis parasitism on different components of house wren Troglodytes aedon reproductive success. Ibis 149:521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC (2012a) Do shiny cowbird females adjust egg pecking behavior according to the level of competition their chicks face in host nests? Behav Proccess 89:137–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tuero DT, Fiorini VD, Mahler B, Reboreda JC (2012b) Shiny cowbird Molothrus bonariensis egg size and chick growth vary between two hosts that differ markedly in body size. J Avian Biol 43:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zusi RL (1984) A functional and evolutionary analysis of rhynchokinesis in birds. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  59. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia A. Cossa
    • 1
  • Diego T. Tuero
    • 1
  • Juan C. Reboreda
    • 1
  • Vanina D. Fiorini
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución & IEGEBA-CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations