Safety in numbers: the dilution effect and other drivers of group life in the face of danger
- 789 Downloads
Animals can congregate in groups for many reasons, from reproductive assurance to improved foraging or predation efficiency, to avoiding themselves becoming the target of predation by other animals. It is the last category that is the focus of this review: group living as protection from predation. The drivers of group life in the face of danger are at the same time diverse and interlinked, with much potential for confusion between concepts. Here we review these concepts, using the dilution effect as a starting point. We construct a mathematical model that allows us to examine various features of the dilution effect and their connection to ecology. We also show the importance of including a time scale when modelling the dilution effect and how this translates into more realistic estimation of the fitness consequences of a diluted predation risk. The central role of the dilution effect in creating safety in numbers is underlined by showing how it may affect life-history evolution and result in the emergence of gregarious life-history strategies, even among sessile organisms limited in their abilities to exhibit behavioural responses to predation. Finally, we review the other central processes underpinning group protection from predation: the satiation effect, selfish herding, the confusion effect and group vigilance.
KeywordsSelfish herding Predator–prey interactions Predation rate Stochastic process Group formation Life-history evolution
We are grateful to Hanna Kokko for the many discussions on the topic and for the constructive feedback on early versions of the manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers provided further comments which significantly improved this work. JL was funded by the Kone Foundation and a University of New South Wales Vice-Chancellor’s Postdoctoral Research Fellowship. KJ was funded by the Academy of Finland (grant number 266208) and the Finnish Cultural foundation.
- Curley EA, Rowley HE, Speed MP (2015) A field demonstration of the costs and benefits of group living to edible and defended prey. Biol Lett 11:20150152Google Scholar
- Kingman JF (1993) Poisson processes. Oxford studies in probability, vol 3. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Kruuk H (1972) The spotted hyena: a study of predation and social behavior. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Lima SL (1990) The influence of models interpretation of vigilance. In: Bekoff M, Jamieson D (eds) Interpretation and explanation in the study of animal behavior, explanation, evolution and adaption, vol 2. Westview press, Boulder, pp 246–267Google Scholar
- Otto SP, Day T (2007) A biologist’s guide to mathematical modeling in ecology and evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Scheuerlein A, Van’t Hof T, Gwinner E (2001) Predators as stressors? Physiological and reproductive consequences of predation risk in tropical stonechats (Saxicola torquata axillaris). Proc R Soc Lond B 270:799–803Google Scholar
- Stearns (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Zöttl M, Frommen JG, Taborsky M (2013) Group size adjustment to ecological demand in a cooperative breeder. Proc R Soc B 280:20122772Google Scholar