Long dorsal “Y-shaped” plate for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures



Osteosynthesis of distal diaphyseal humeral fractures is challenging, especially if there is a metaphyseal extension of the fracture line with a butterfly third fragment or if the fracture is bifocal. These fractures put the radial nerve at risk at the time of the fracture and during surgery. We hypothesize that ORIF with a long dorsal Y-plate matching the dorsal aspects of the humeral diaphysis and of the two metaphyseal columns would provide a reliable method of fixation for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures even when there is a metaphyseal extension or bifocal component.


Between 2015 and 2019, 17 distal diaphyseal humeral fractures in 17 consecutive patients (14 men, 3 women, mean age 38 years) were operated on with a long “Y-shaped” dorsal plate. There were two bifocal fractures and 11 diaphyso-metaphyseal fractures with butterfly fragments. All 17 patients could be retrospectively followed up clinically and radiographically at a mean follow-up of 25 months (min 4, max 40). Clinical charts included VAS pain, elbow range of motion, QuickDASH, MEPS and subjective elbow value.


Bone healing was observed in all cases. Five patients (29%) had a pre-operative radial nerve palsy. All pre-operative radial nerve palsies but one recovered spontaneously. One complete radial nerve palsy that was not present before the operation was observed after surgery. It recovered spontaneously in four months. One case of post-operative elbow stiffness required a revision. Only one case (5%) showing a complication directly related to the plate (secondary displacement) required revision. Mean post-operative elbow flexion was 134°. Extension deficit averaged 13°. Subjective elbow value, QuickDASH and MEPS averaged respectively 81%, 19 points and 92 points.


Currently available plates (long dorsal straight, short dorsal “Y-shaped”, long lateral) may have limitations in terms of screw purchase or biomechanical efficiency when ORIF of distal diaphyseal humeral fractures is considered. A long dorsal “Y-shaped” plate is a new alternative which may be successfully used even in the most difficult cases.


Our study suggests that a long dorsal “Y-shaped” plate is suitable for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures especially when there is a metaphyseal bifocal or third fragment component.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J et al (2006) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. An epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88:1469–1473. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17634

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ali E, Griffiths D, Obi N et al (2015) Nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures revisited. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:210–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ayoub MS, Tarkin IS (2018) Best care paradigm to optimize functionality after extra-articular distal humeral fractures in the young patient. J Clin Orthop Trauma 9:S116–S122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sarmiento A, Horowitch A, Aboulafia A, Vangsness CT (1990) Functional bracing for comminuted extra-articular fractures of the distal third of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 72:283–287

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Capo JT, Debkowska MP, Liporace F et al (2014) Outcomes of distal humerus diaphyseal injuries fixed with a single-column anatomic plate. Int Orthop 38:1037–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2213-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kumar MN, Ravishankar MR, Manur R (2015) Single locking compression plate fixation of extra-articular distal humeral fractures. J Orthop Traumatol 16:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0325-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Prasarn ML, Ahn J, Paul O et al (2011) Dual plating for fractures of the distal third of the humeral shaft. J Orthop Trauma 25:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181df96a7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Meloy GM, Mormino MA, Siska PA, Tarkin IS (2013) A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures: single-column plating. Injury 44:1620–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Maresca A, Fantasia R, Cianforlini M et al (2016) Distal-third diaphyseal fractures of the humerus: choice of approach and surgical treatment. Musculoskelet Surg 100:97–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-016-0418-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Levy JC, Kalandiak SP, Hutson JJ, Zych G (2005) An alternative method of osteosynthesis for distal humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Trikha V, Agrawal P, Das S et al (2017) Functional outcome of extra-articular distal humerus fracture fixation using a single locking plate: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 25:2309499017727948. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017727948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Jain D, Goyal GS, Garg R et al (2017) Outcome of anatomic locking plate in extraarticular distal humeral shaft fractures. Indian J Orthop 51:86–92. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.197554

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Scolaro JA, Voleti P, Makani A et al (2014) Surgical fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures with a posterolateral plate through a triceps-reflecting technique. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Saragaglia D, Rouchy R-C, Mercier N (2013) Fractures of the distal humerus operated on using the Lambda® plate: report of 75 cases at 9.5 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:707–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.04.007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:453–458

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Meinberg E, Agel J, Roberts C et al (2018) Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium—2018. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–S10. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gschwend N (1981) Our operative approach to the elbow joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 98:143–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00460803

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M et al (2008) Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med 40:665–671. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schneeberger AG, Kösters MC, Steens W (2014) Comparison of the subjective elbow value and the Mayo elbow performance score. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23:308–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Morrey B, An K, Chao E (1993) Function evaluation of the elbow. In: The Elbow and Its Disorders, 2nd edn. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, p 95

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Vazquez O, Rutgers M, Ring DC et al (2010) Fate of the ulnar nerve after operative fixation of distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24:395–399. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e3e273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schemitsch EH, Tencer AF, Henley MB (1994) Biomechanical evaluation of methods of internal fixation of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma 8:468–475

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Anglen JO, Archdeacon MT, Cannada LK, Herscovici D (2008) Avoiding complications in the treatment of humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1580–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Scolaro JA, Hsu JE, Svach DJ, Mehta S (2014) Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants. Injury 45:2040–2044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sabalic S, Kodvanj J, Pavic A (2013) Comparative study of three models of extra-articular distal humerus fracture osteosynthesis using the finite element method on an osteoporotic computational model. Injury 44:S56–S61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70200-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Illical EM, Farrell DJ, Siska PA et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes after triceps split versus sparing surgery for extra-articular distal humerus fractures. Injury 45:1545–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Streufert BD, Eaford I, Sellers TR et al (2020) Iatrogenic nerve palsy occurs with anterior and posterior approaches for humeral shaft fixation. J Orthop Trauma 34:163–168. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yin P, Zhang L, Mao Z et al (2014) Comparison of lateral and posterior surgical approach in management of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures. Injury 45:1121–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lee HM, Kim YS, Kang S et al (2018) Modified anterolateral approach for internal fixation of Holstein-Lewis humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Sci 23:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2017.10.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information




T.D.: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing the manuscript

M.B.: analysis and interpretation of data and reviewing the manuscript

G.H.: analysis and interpretation of data and reviewing the manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Herzberg.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethical Committee of Lyon CHU/Project n°19-156

Consent to participate

Verbal informed consent was obtained prior to the interview.

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figs. 2, 3 and 4.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Level of evidence: IV, retrospective study

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Druel, T., Burnier, M. & Herzberg, G. Long dorsal “Y-shaped” plate for distal diaphyseal humeral fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04969-8

Download citation


  • Distal diaphyseal humeral fracture
  • ORIF
  • Y-shaped dorsal humeral plate