Patient-specific instruments (PSI) have been designed to improve the accuracy of performing opening-wedge high-tibial osteotomies (OW-HTO). This study aims to evaluate the lower limb alignment, by comparing pre-operative desired correction to post-operative achieved correction, the difference in surgical time and number of radiological exposures in OW-HTO using patient-specific instruments (PSI) versus conventional osteotomies and the specific and non-specific complications that occurred.
We performed a single-centre, retrospective, observational study, including 25 consecutive patients undergoing OW-HTO using PSI, from January 2019 to October 2020.
Pre-operatively, the mean hip-knee angle (HKA) was 167°, the mean tibial slope was 7.9° and the mean medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) was 82.5°. Post-operatively, the mean HKA was 182.2° (180.1–184.7°), the tibial slope was 6.5° (4.2–12.9°) and the MPTA was 92.8° (90.6–93°). In both coronal and sagittal plane, all knees were within 2° from the planned value. The mean tourniquet time, by which the surgical time was measured, was 40 minutes and the average number of intra-operative fluoroscopic images was 10 (range: 7–14), significantly less than when using conventional techniques.
The use of PSI in OW-HTO allows accurate achievement of the desired correction, while shortening the OR time. The number of radiological exposures is also decreased, in comparison with the conventional osteotomies.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Availability of data and materials
The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Amis AA (2013) Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 21:197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2122-3
Gardiner A, Richmond JC (2013) Periarticular osteotomies for degenerative joint disease of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc 21:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0b013e31826d2f5d
Schwartz C (2018) Minimally invasive opening wedge tibia outpatient osteotomy, using screw-to-plate locking technique and a calcium phosphate cement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28:799–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2109-3
Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD et al (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: Patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B 90:1548–1557. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.21198
Foroughi N, Smith R, Vanwanseele B (2009) The association of external knee adduction moment with biomechanical variables in osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee 16:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.12.007
Teichtahl AJ, Davies-Tuck ML, Wluka AE et al (2009) Change in knee angle influences the rate of medial tibial cartilage volume loss in knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 17:8–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2008.05.013
Hofmann S, Lobenhoffer P, Staubli A, Van Heerwaarden R (2009) Osteotomies of the knee joint in patients with monocompartmental arthritis. Orthopade 38:755–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-009-1458-y
Kuriyama S, Watanabe M, Nakamura S et al (2020) Classical target coronal alignment in high tibial osteotomy demonstrates validity in terms of knee kinematics and kinetics in a computer model. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1568–1578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05575-3
Yang JCS, Chen CF, Luo CA et al (2018) Clinical experience using a 3D-printed patient-specific instrument for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Biomed Res Int 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9246529
So SY, Lee SS, Jung EY et al (2020) Difference in joint line convergence angle between the supine and standing positions is the most important predictive factor of coronal correction error after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1516–1525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05555-7
Hohloch L, Kim S, Mehl J et al (2018) Customized post-operative alignment improves clinical outcome following medial open-wedge osteotomy. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2766–2773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4731-3
Shelburne KB, Kim HJ, Sterett WI, Pandy MG (2011) Effect of posterior tibial slope on knee biomechanics during functional activity. J Orthop Res 29:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21242
Munier M, Donnez M, Ollivier M et al (2017) Can three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides be used to achieve optimal correction for high tibial osteotomy? Pilot study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103:245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.020
Brosset T, Pasquier G, Migaud H, Gougeon F (2011) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy performed without filling the defect but with locking plate fixation (TomoFixTM) and early weight-bearing: prospective evaluation of bone union, precision and maintenance of correction in 51 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.06.011
Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Kim DH, Nag R (2020) Faster union rate and better clinical outcomes using autologous bone graft after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05463-w
El-Assal MA, Khalifa YE, Abdel-Hamid MM et al (2010) Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone graft. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 18:961–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1104-6
Santic V, Tudor A, Sestan B et al (2010) Bone allograft provides bone healing in the medial opening high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 34:225–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0916-9
Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S et al (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 21:170–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2087-2
Pérez-Mañanes R, Burró JA, Manaute JR et al (2016) 3D surgical printing cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: do it yourself. J Knee Surg 29:690–695. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1572412
Donnez M, Ollivier M, Munier M et al (2018) Are three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides for open wedge high tibial osteotomy accurate? An in vitro study. J Orthop Surg Res 13:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0872-4
Hankemeier S, Hufner T, Wang G et al (2006) Navigated open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: advantages and disadvantages compared to the conventional technique in a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 14:917–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0035-8
Corin B, Wilson A, Khakha R et al (2020) Posteromedial opening-wedge tibial osteotomy for metaphyseal varus and abnormal posterior slope correction in failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using a custom cutting guide. Arthrosc Tech 9:e1101–e1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2020.04.008
Deleanu B, Prejbeanu R, Crisan D et al (2015) Gait characteristics before hardware removal in patients operated upon for tibial plateau fractures. Int Orthop 39:1411–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2691-0
Predescu V, Prescura C, Olaru R et al (2017) Patient specific instrumentation versus conventional knee arthroplasty: comparative study. Int Orthop 41:1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3356-3
Pape D, Lorbach O, Schmitz C, Busch LC, Nicolien Van Giffen RS, Kohn DM (2009) Effect of a biplanar osteotomy on primary stability following high tibial osteotomy: a biomechanical cadaver study. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc:204–211(2010)
Feucht MJ, Minzlaff P, Saier T et al (2014) Degree of axis correction in valgus high tibial osteotomy: proposal of an individualised approach. Int Orthop 38:2273–2280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2442-7
Sys G, Eykens H, Lenaerts G et al (2017) Accuracy assessment of surgical planning and three-dimensional-printed patient-specific guides for orthopaedic osteotomies. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 231:499–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411917702177
Jud L, Fürnstahl P, Vlachopoulos L et al (2020) Malpositioning of patient-specific instruments within the possible degrees of freedom in high-tibial osteotomy has no considerable influence on mechanical leg axis correction. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1356–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05432-3
Akamatsu Y, Kumagai K, Kobayashi H, Tsuji M, Saito T (2018) Effect of increased coronal inclination of the tibial plateau after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 34:2158–2169.e2
Babis GC, An K-N, Chao EYS, Larson DR, Rand JA, Sim FH (2008) Upper tibia osteotomy: long term results — realignment analysis using OASIS computer software. J Orthop Sci 13
Babis GC, An K-N, Chao EYS, Rand JA, Sim FH (2002) Double level osteotomy of the knee: a method to retain joint-line obliquity. Clinical results. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:1380–1388
Alexandru L, Haragus H, Deleanu B et al (2019) Haematology panel biomarkers for humeral, femoral, and tibial diaphyseal fractures. Int Orthop 43:1567–1572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04305-1
Itou J, Itoh M, Maruki C et al (2020) Deep peroneal nerve has a potential risk of injury during open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 28:1372–1379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05445-y
Attinger MC, Behrend H, Jost B (2014) Complete rupture of the popliteal artery complicating high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop 11:192–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2014.08.002
Brown CW, Orme TJ, Richardson HD (1986) The rate of pseudarthrosis (Surgical nonunion) in patients who are smokers and patients who are nonsmokers: a comparison study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11:942–943
Meidinger G, Imhoff AB, Paul J et al (2011) May smokers and overweight patients be treated with a medial open-wedge HTO? Risk factors for non-union. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 19:333–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1335-6
Bonasia DE, Dettoni F, Sito G et al (2014) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment overload/arthritis in the varus knee: prognostic factors. Am J Sports Med 42:690–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513516577
Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Aratake M et al (2009) Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with early full weight bearing. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg 25:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.08.015
Chaouche S, Jacquet C, Fabre-Aubrespy M et al (2019) Patient-specific cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: safety and accuracy analysis of a hundred patients continuous cohort. Int Orthop 43:2757–2765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04372-4
Saragaglia D, Chedal-Bornu B, Rouchy RC et al (2016) Role of computer-assisted surgery in osteotomies around the knee. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3387–3395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4302-z
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This retrospective study was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for publication
Consent to publish individual data was obtained from all patients.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Predescu, V., Grosu, AM., Gherman, I. et al. Early experience using patient-specific instrumentation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04964-z
- Open-wedge tibial osteotomy
- Patient-specific instruments