Abstract
Purpose
It has been acknowledged that implant wear correlates with the risk for periprosthetic osteolysis, being aggressive granulomatosis the worst expression of bone resorption. We sought to determine the clinical, radiological, and histological features of aggressive granulomatosis after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Methods
We included nine cases with aggressive granulomatosis of the hip around cemented stems. Indications for revision THA consisted of progressive signs of extensive bone resorption or implant loosening. Mean follow-up since revision THA was 143 months (SD ± 59.4). We analysed clinical outcomes, component loosening and gross as well as histological characteristics of the granulomatous lesions.
Results
Overall mean time between primary THA and revision surgery was 81 months (SD ± 20.8). All of the cases evidenced multiple ovoid tumour-like lesions around the stem with extensive bone loss. Only one case reported thigh pain before revision surgery, with radiological evidence of stem loosening; the remaining cases were asymptomatic with well-fixed implants. Gross anatomy findings revealed metallosis in the femoral canal and inside the cystic lesions. Pathology analysis showed monocyte-macrophage-dominated adverse foreign-body-type tissue reaction with fibroblastic reactive zones and granulomatous inflammation.
Conclusions
We found a prevalence of 1% of this aseptic mode of implant failure. Since most of the retrieved stems were not loose, we did not find any alarming clinical symptoms anticipating implant failure. In this scenario, surgeons should be aware of the rapidly progressive nature of this entity and propose a revision THA in a timely fashion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harris WH (1994) Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 65:113–123. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679408993734
Jones LC, Hungerford DS (1987) Cement disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 225:192–206
Pajarinen J, Gallo J, Takagi M, Goodman SB (2018) Particle disease really does exist: an evidence based rebuttal to Dr. Mjöberg’s opinion letter. Acta Orthop 89:133–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1402463
Jiranek WA, Machado M, Jasty M et al (1993) Production of cytokines around loosened cemented acetabular components. Analysis with immunohistochemical techniques and in situ hybridization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:863–879. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.mmj.3
Ries MD, Link TM (2012) Monitoring and risk of progression of osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2097–2105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhse.2007.02.052
Harris WH, Schiller AL, Scholler JM et al (1976) Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:612–618
Goldring SR, Schiller AL, Roelke M et al (1983) The synovial-like membrane at the bone-cement interface in loose total hip replacements and its proposed role in bone lysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:575–584. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.mmj.3
Tallroth K, Eskola A, Santavirta S et al (1989) Aggressive granulomatous lesions after hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:571–575
Santavirta S, Konttinen YT, Bergroth V et al (1990) Aggressive granulomatous lesions associated with hip arthroplasty. Immunopathological studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:252–258
Santavirta S, Hoikka V, Eskola A et al (1990) Aggressive granulomatous lesions in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:980–984
Hartofilakidis G, Stamos K, Karachalios T et al (1996) Congenital hip disease in adults. Classification of acetabular deficiencies and operative treatment with acetabuloplasty combined with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:683–692
Saleh KJ, Kassim R, Yoon P, Vorlicky LN (2002) Complications of total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 31:485–488
DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32
Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27
Aribindi R, Barba M, Solomon MI et al (1998) Bypass fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 29:319–329
Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE (1990) Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 257:107–128
D’Aubigné RM, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36–A:451–475
Buttaro MA, Comba F, Piccaluga F (2009) Proximal femoral reconstructions with bone impaction grafting and metal mesh. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2325–2334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0777-y
Korovessis P, Repanti M (1994) Evolution of aggressive granulomatous periprosthetic lesions in cemented hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:155–161
Moholkar K, Tamblyn P (2001) Aggressive granulomatous lesion presenting as tumor in cementless long stem total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 16:404–407. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.23365
Sebecić B, Japjec M, Dojcinović B et al (2013) Aggressive granulomatosis after cementless total hip arthroplasty as a result of inflammatory reaction to metal debris: case report. Acta Clin Croat 52:492–496
Eskola A, Santavirta S, Konttinen YT et al (1990) Cementless revision of aggressive granulomatous lesions in hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:212–216
Willert H-G, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.A.02039pp
Daniel J, Holland J, Quigley L et al (2012) Pseudotumors associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:86–93. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01612
Nawabi DH, Gold S, Lyman S et al (2014) MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:471–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2788-y
Nich C, Hamadouche M (2011) Cup loosening after cemented Metasul® total hip replacement: a retrieval analysis. Int Orthop 35:965–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1061-1
Santavirta S (2003) Compatibility of the totally replaced hip. Reduction of wear by amorphous diamond coating. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 74:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310018108
Santavirta S, Lappalainen R, Konttinen YT (2004) Materials for artificial joints. Duodecim 120:2020–2026
Joshi RP, Eftekhar NS, McMahon DJ, O a N (1998) Osteolysis after Charnley primary low-friction arthroplasty. A comparison of two matched paired groups. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:585–590. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B4.7361
Clauss M, Ilchmann T, Zimmermann P, Ochsner PE (2010) The histology around the cemented Müller straight stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92–B:1515–1521. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B11.25342
Yamako G, Janssen D, Hanada S et al (2017) Improving stress shielding following total hip arthroplasty by using a femoral stem made of β type Ti-33.6Nb-4Sn with a Young’s modulus gradation. J Biomech 63:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.08.017
Santavirta S, Takagi M, Gómez-Barrena E et al (1999) Studies of host response to orthopedic implants and biomaterials. J Long-Term Eff Med Implants 9:67–76
Mitchelson AJ, Wilson CJ, Mihalko WM et al (2015) Biomaterial hypersensitivity: is it real? Supportive evidence and approach considerations for metal allergic patients following total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int 2015:137287. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/137287
Guenther D, Thomas P, Kendoff D et al (2016) Allergic reactions in arthroplasty: myth or serious problem? Int Orthop 40:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3001-6
Hood RW, Wright TM, Burstein AH (1983) Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 17:829–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820170510
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
Each author certifies that he has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. No funding/grant was received for the development of this research. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. Each author certifies that his institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
Additional information
Level of Evidence: 4 - Retrospective case series
Location where the work was performed: ‘Carlos E. Ottolenghi’ Department of Orthopaedics, Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires, ACK1199, 4247 Potosi St, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Slullitel, P.A.I., Brandariz, R., Oñativia, J.I. et al. Aggressive granulomatosis of the hip: a forgotten mode of aseptic failure. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 1321–1328 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4252-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4252-9