Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intra-operative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection can rely on frozen sections in patients without synovial fluid analyses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine whether frozen sections can increase diagnostic values of serological tests for the assessment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients without synovial fluid analyses.

Methods

A retrospective review of 128 revision arthroplasties (79 hips and 49 knees) from January 2016 to December 2017 was performed. Diagnosis of PJI was based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria for infection. Three diagnostic models for PJI, with model 1 including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), model 2 including model 1 plus frozen sections > 5 polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN)s per high-power field (HPF), and model 3 including model 1 plus frozen sections > 10 PMNs per HPF, were developed. Then receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated, and the areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were compared.

Results

The AUC of model 1, model 2, and model 3 was 79.40% [95% confidence interval (CI), 69.84 to 86.64%], 89.30% (95% CI, 82.93 to 93.92%), and 85.52% (95% CI, 78.44 to 91.4%), respectively. The AUC of model 1 was significantly lower than that of model 2 (p = 0.002) and model 3 (p = 0.039). Although the result was not significant (p = 0.132), there was a trend toward a higher AUC of model 2 than model 3.

Conclusions

This study reveals that intra-operative frozen sections significantly increased the performance of serum ESR and CRP in the diagnosis of PJI. The combination of serological tests and frozen sections for the assessment of PJI may be reliable in patients without synovial fluid analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perfetti DC, Boylan MR, Naziri Q et al (2017) Have periprosthetic hip infection rates plateaued? J Arthroplast 32:2244–2247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Son M-S et al (2018) Are we winning or losing the battle with periprosthetic joint infection: trends in periprosthetic joint infection and mortality risk for the Medicare population. J Arthroplast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.042

  3. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF et al (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2992–2994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Parvizi J, Gehrke T (2014) Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 29:1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pandey R, Drakoulakis E, Athanasou NA (1999) An assessment of the histological criteria used to diagnose infection in hip revision arthroplasty tissues. J Clin Pathol 52:118–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tohtz SW, Müller M, Morawietz L et al (2010) Validity of frozen sections for analysis of periprosthetic loosening membranes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:762–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1102-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Athanasou NA, Pandey R, de Steiger R et al (1995) Diagnosis of infection by frozen section during revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:28–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bori G, Soriano A, García S et al (2006) Low sensitivity of histology to predict the presence of microorganisms in suspected aseptic loosening of a joint prosthesis. Mod Pathol 19:874–877. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3800606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bori G, Soriano A, García S et al (2009) Neutrophils in frozen section and type of microorganism isolated at the time of resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:591–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0679-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muñoz-Mahamud E, Bori G, García S et al (2013) Usefulness of histology for predicting infection at the time of hip revision for the treatment of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures. J Arthroplast 28:1247–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao X, Guo C, Zhao G-S et al (2013) Ten versus five polymorphonuclear leukocytes as threshold in frozen section tests for periprosthetic infection: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplast 28:913–917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K et al (2018) The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078

  13. Francés Borrego A, Martínez FM, Cebrian Parra JL et al (2007) Diagnosis of infection in hip and knee revision surgery: intraoperative frozen section analysis. Int Orthop 31:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0069-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Banit DM, Kaufer H, Hartford JM (2002) Intraoperative frozen section analysis in revision total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res:230–238

  15. Partridge DG, Winnard C, Townsend R et al (2018) Joint aspiration, including culture of reaspirated saline after a “dry tap”, is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 100-B:749–754. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-0970.R2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberts P, Walters AJ, McMinn DJ (1992) Diagnosing infection in hip replacements. The use of fine-needle aspiration and radiometric culture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:265–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feldman DS, Lonner JH, Desai P, Zuckerman JD (1995) The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1807–1813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44:837–845

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saleh A, George J, Faour M et al (2018) Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections. Bone & Joint Research 7:85–93. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.71.BJR-2017-0323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Garbuz DS et al (2007) Use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level to diagnose infection before revision total knee arthroplasty: a prospective evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1409–1416. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McArthur BA, Abdel MP, Taunton MJ et al (2015) Seronegative infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic infections with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level. Bone Joint J 97-B:939–944. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.35500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yi PH, Cross MB, Moric M et al (2014) The 2013 Frank Stinchfield award: diagnosis of infection in the early postoperative period after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:424–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3089-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zmistowski B, Della Valle C, Bauer TW et al (2014) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 29:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwiecien G, George J, Klika AK et al (2017) Intraoperative frozen section histology: matched for Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. J Arthroplast 32:223–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bori G, McNally MA, Athanasou N (2018) Histopathology in periprosthetic joint infection: when will the morphomolecular diagnosis be a reality? Biomed Res Int 2018:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1412701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdul-Karim FW, McGinnis MG, Kraay M et al (1998) Frozen section biopsy assessment for the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in patients undergoing revision of arthroplasties. Mod Pathol 11:427–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Della Valle CJ, Bogner E, Desai P et al (1999) Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:684–689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tsaras G, Maduka-Ezeh A, Inwards CY et al (2012) Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1700–1711. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K et al (2018) The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplast 33:1309–1314. e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all staff from the participating departments and clinics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China

    Chi Xu, Heng Guo & Ji-Ying Chen

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Mentougou District Hospital, Beijing, China

    Heng Guo

Authors
  1. Chi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heng Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ji-Ying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji-Ying Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, C., Guo, H. & Chen, JY. Intra-operative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection can rely on frozen sections in patients without synovial fluid analyses. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 1303–1308 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4227-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4227-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation