International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 8, pp 1859–1863 | Cite as

Arthroscopic synovectomy of the knee joint for rheumatoid arthritis

  • Marina LipinaEmail author
  • Maxim Makarov
  • Victor Mukhanov
  • Alexander Karpashevich
  • Sergey Maglevaniy
  • Vera Amirdjапоvа
  • Sergey Archipov
Original Paper



To investigate the effect of knee arthroscopic synovectomy (AS) on the disease activity, quality-of-life (QoL), and the functional status of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the outcomes of AS performed on 138 RA patients; pre-surgery assessments were done using Disease Activity score (DAS 28) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data З (RAPID-3) on а multidimensional health-assessment questionnaire for disease activity, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and the Short-Form Medical Outcomes Study (SF-36) for quality of life, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) for functional status. The pain response to SA was measured by а visual analogue score (VAS) and the Knee Society Score (KSS).


All parameters assessed in the study showed significant positive changes: the activity of the disease decreased, and patients’ functional status and QoL improved.


AS is effective treatment for recurrent synovitis of the knee in RA patients. This technique improves the functional status of patients and their quality of life and reduces the activity of the disease.


Rheumatoid arthritis Synovectomy Knee Arthroscopy Quality of life Synovitis ᅟ 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration ant its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.


  1. 1.
    Nasonov EL (2014) Achievements in rheumatology in the XXI century. Rheumatology Science and Practice 52(2):133–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen GQ et al (2011) A 2-year follow-up results of knee arthroscopic synovectomy plus disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 91(29):2034–2037PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karateev DE, Radenska-Lopovok SG, Nasonova VA, Ivanova MM (2003) Synovial membrane in the early stage of rheumatoid arthritis: clinico-morphological comparisons. Ter Arkh 75(5):12–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kosinski M et al (2000) Determining minimally important changes in general and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 43(7):1478–1487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van der Heijde DM et al (1992) Validity of single variables and composite indices for measuring diseases activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 51(2):177–181CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Weisleder L (1995) Arthroscopic synovectomy of the knee: is it helpful? Arthroscopy 11(1):91–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Judas F et al (2007) Surgical procedures for treatment of the rheumatoid knee. Acta Reumatol Port 32(4):333–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carl HD (2008) Effectiveness of arthroscopic synovectomy in rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol 67(6):485–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ware JE Jr, Shernourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masłoń A et al (2007) Early clinical results of open and arthroscopic synovectomy in knee inflammation. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9(5):520–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kerschbaumer F et al (1998) Combined arthroscopic and radiation synovectomy in rheumatoid arthritis. Orthopade 27(3):188–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lipina M, Makarov M, Makarov S, Novikov A (2017) The degree of cartilage degradation assessed by serum biomarker levels changes after arthroscopic knee synovectomy in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int Orthop 41(11):2259–2264. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43(4:752–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pincus T et al (2009) RAPID3—an index of physical function, pain, and global status as «vital signs» to improve care for people with chronic rheumatic diseases. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 67(2):211–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fiocco U et al (2005) Rheumatoid and psoriatic knee synovitis: clinical, grey scale, and power Doppler ultrasound assessment of the response to etanercept. Ann Rheum Dis 64(6):899–905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanbe K, Inoue K (2006) Efficacy of arthroscopic synovectomy for the effect attenuation cases of infliximab in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 25(6):877–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kubacki J et al (2006) The value of synovectomy of the knee in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 8(1):99–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murgo A, Paresce E, Fantini F (2003) Arthroscopic synovectomy in chronic inflammatory rheumatism: clinical and functional aspects. Reumatismo 55(1):39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Georgiannos D, Boutsiadis A, Agathangelidis F, Papastergiou S, Karataglis D, Bisbinas I (2017) Arthroscopically-assisted mini open partial synovectomy for the treatment of localized pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee. A retrospective comparative study with long-term follow up. Int Orthop 41(5):925–930. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van der Heijden L, Piner SR, van de Sande MA (2016) Pigmented villonodular synovitis: a crowdsourcing study of two hundred and seventy two patients. Int Orthop 40(12):2459–2468. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jain JK, Vidyasagar JV, Sagar R, Patel H, Chetan ML, Bajaj A (2013) Arthroscopic synovectomy in pigmented villonodular synovitis of the knee: clinical series and outcome. Int Orthop 37(12):2363–2369. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Insall JN et al (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Ortop Relat Res 248:13–14Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Larsen A, Dale K, Ee M (1977) Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn 18(4):481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prevoo ML et al (1995) Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38(1):44–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rao SK, Rao S, Naik AM (2006) A descriptive clinical evaluation of arthroscopic synovectomy in rheumatoid knees: a prospective study. Ceylon Med J 51(1):7–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kelley WN, Harris ED, Ruddy S, Sledge CB (1993) Textbook of rheumatology, 4th ed. Philadelphia WB Saunders Company 779–9Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.MSechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)MoscowRussia
  2. 2.V.A. Nasonova Science and Research Institute of RheumatologyMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Federal Science and Clinical Center of Federal Medical Biological AgencyMoscowRussia
  4. 4.People’s Friendship University of RussiaMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations