Pelvic pitch and roll during total hip arthroplasty performed through a posterolateral approach. A potential source of error in free-hand cup positioning
Intraoperative pelvic motion can alter the perceived cup inclination and version during non-navigated THA. We quantified pelvic motion during different phases of primary THA performed in the lateral decubitus through a posterolateral approach.
Pelvic roll (rotation of the coronal plane) and pitch angles (rotation parallel to the coronal plane) were studied in 75 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis by four arthroplasty surgeons. Ten steps of surgery were defined. Angular motion was recorded with a miniature surgical device that utilizes inertial sensors.
The mean absolute roll ranged from 0.03° detected at the end of surgery to 4.13° detected during acetabular exposure. The mean absolute pitch ranged from 0.05° detected at the end of surgery to 2.54° detected during hip dislocation. The maximum pelvic roll and pitch detected during surgery averaged 17.62° (SD: 5.08) and 9.3° (SD: 3.39) respectively. Absolute roll and pitch angles were not affected by patient’s BMI, sex, pre-operative hip motion, or surgeon. Before cup insertion, the greatest mean change in roll was observed during acetabular exposure (10.02° anteriorly), and for pitch was observed during dislocation (1.88° caudally).
During THA performed through a posterolateral approach, there is a progressive anterior pelvic roll that peaks before cup insertion. This can lead to underestimation of cup anteversion during non-navigated THA. The anterior roll does not completely correct, even when all retractors and external forces acting on the pelvis are removed. Pelvic pitch that could affect the perceived cup inclination occurs to a lesser extent than pelvic roll.
KeywordsTotal hip arthroplasty Pelvic motion Cup inclination Cup version
We are grateful to Jeffrey M. Muir, MSc, DC, MSc (Clin Epi) and Luke Becker, BASc from Intellijoint Surgical, Inc. for their assistance in data extraction and graphic preparation.
This study was partially funded by Intellijoint Surgical, Glenn Bergenfiend and The Sidney Milton and Leoma Simon Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest statement
Funding for this study has been received by Intellijoint Surgical, Inc.
- 8.Meermans G, Van Doorn WJ, Koenraadt K, Kats J (2014) The use of the transverse acetabular ligament for determining the orientation of the components in total hip replacement a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J 96-B(3):312–318. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B3.32989 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Padgett DE, González Della Valle A (2006) The uncemented acetabular component. In: Barrack RL, Rosenberg AG (eds) Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. The hip, 1st edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 283–294Google Scholar
- 19.Kawarai Y, Iida S, Nakamura J, Shinada Y, Suzuki C, Ohtori S (2017) Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position. Int Orthop 41:2487–2493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kobayashi H, Homma Y, Baba T, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2016) Surgeons changing the approach for total hip arthroplasty from posterior to direct anterior with fluoroscopy should consider potential excessive cup anteversion and flexion implantation of the stem in their early experience. Int Orthop 40:1813–1819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Bayraktar V, Weber M, von Kunow F, Zeman F, Craiovan B, Renkawitz T, Grifka J, Woerner M (2017) Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography. Int Orthop 41:731–738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar