Standards for external fixation application: national survey under the auspices of the German Trauma Society
- 168 Downloads
External fixation is widely accepted as a provisional or sometimes definitive treatment for long-bone fractures. Indications include but are not limited to damage control surgery in poly-traumatized patients as well as provisional bridging to definite treatment with soft tissue at risk. As little is known about surgeon’s habits in applying this treatment strategy, we performed a national survey.
We utilized the member database of the German Trauma Society (DGU). The questionnaire encompassed 15 questions that addresses topics including participants’ position, experience, workplace, and questions regarding specifics of external fixation application in different anatomical regions. Furthermore, we compared differences between trauma centre levels and surgeon-related factors.
The participants predominantly worked in level 1 trauma centres (42.7%) and were employed as attendings (54.7%). There was widespread consensus for planning and intra-operative radiographical control of external fixation. Surgeons appointed at a level I trauma centre preferred significantly more often supra-acetabular pin placement in external fixation of the pelvis rather than the utilization of iliac pins (75.8%, p = 0.0001). Moreover, they were more likely to favor a mini-open approach to insert humeral pins (42.4%, p = 0.003). Overall, blunt dissection and mini-open approaches seemed equally popular (38.2 and 34.1%). Department chairmen indicated more often than their colleagues to follow written pin-care protocols for minimization of infection (16.7%, p = 0.003).
Despite the fact that external fixation usage is widespread and well established among trauma surgeons in Germany, there are substantial differences in the method of application.
KeywordsExternal fixation Application standards Pelvic external fixation Pin-tract infection
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 8.DeJong ES, DeBerardino TM, Brooks DE, Nelson BJ, Campbell AA, Bottoni CR, Pusateri AE, Walton RS, Guymon CH, McManus AT (2001) Antimicrobial efficacy of external fixator pins coated with a lipid stabilized hydroxyapatite/chlorhexidine complex to prevent pin tract infection in a goat model. J Trauma 50(6):1008–1014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Horst K, Andruszkow H, Weber C, Dienstknecht T, Hildebrand F, Tarkin I, Pape HC (2015) Standards of external fixation in prolonged applications to allow safe conversion to definitive extremity surgery: the Aachen algorithm for acute ex fix conversion. Injury 46(Suppl 3):S13–S18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hosny GA, Ahmed AA, Hussein MA (2018) Clinical outcomes with the corticotomy-first technique associated with the Ilizarov method for the management of the septic long bones non-union. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3924-9
- 22.Kim WY, Hearn TC, Seleem O, Mahalingam E, Stephen D, Tile M (1999) Effect of pin location on stability of pelvic external fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res (361):237–244Google Scholar
- 24.Lethaby A, Temple J, Santy J (2008) Pin site care for preventing infections associated with external bone fixators and pins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):Cd004551Google Scholar
- 25.Lethaby A, Temple J, Santy-Tomlinson J (2013) Pin site care for preventing infections associated with external bone fixators and pins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):Cd004551Google Scholar
- 30.Pape HC, Hildebrand F, Pertschy S, Zelle B, Garapati R, Grimme K, Krettek C, Reed RL 2nd (2002) Changes in the management of femoral shaft fractures in polytrauma patients: from early total care to damage control orthopedic surgery. J Trauma 53(3):452–461 discussion 461-452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Pape HC, Rixen D, Morley J, Husebye EE, Mueller M, Dumont C, Gruner A, Oestern HJ, Bayeff-Filoff M, Garving C, Pardini D, van Griensven M, Krettek C, Giannoudis P (2007) Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients). Ann Surg 246(3):491–499 discussion 499-501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Pape HC, Lefering R, Butcher N, Peitzman A, Leenen L, Marzi I, Lichte P, Josten C, Bouillon B, Schmucker U, Stahel P, Giannoudis P, Balogh Z (2014) The definition of polytrauma revisited: an international consensus process and proposal of the new ‘Berlin definition’. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(5):780–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar