Long-term survivorship of stemless anatomical shoulder replacement
- 264 Downloads
Like in many other joints, current shoulder replacement designs aim at bone preservation. According to the literature available, stemless total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) compares favourably with stemmed designs in terms of function and survivorship of the implant. However, long-term results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty are still missing. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate long-term results of stemless anatomical TSA.
Between 2006 and 2009, 51 shoulders in 46 patients were resurfaced using the Biomet Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS). Thirty-one shoulders in 26 patients who were aged 66.7 ± 10.0 (range 34–82) years were available for review at a mean follow-up of 94.7 ± 11.3 (76–124) months.
The implant survival rate was 93.5% at eight years. The overall revision rate of the TESS implant was 9.7%. Radiolucent lines were found on the glenoid side of the TESS arthroplasty in 90.9% of the cases. All stemless humeral corolla implants showed solid fixation at follow-up. Clinical scores significantly improved at long-term follow-up (VAS from 8.1 ± 0.9 to 1.0 ± 1.2, p < 0.001; Quick-DASH from 67.9 ± 13.5 to 18.7 ± 16.5, p < 0.001 and Constant score from 14.7 ± 6.1 to 68.8 ± 13.2, p < 0.001).
Stemless TSA has stood the test of time at eight years in terms of clinical scores, radiographic loosening, complication rates and implant survivorship.
KeywordsTESS Stemless TSA Shoulder arthroplasty Long-term follow-up Survivorship
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Maier MW, Lauer S, Klotz MC, Bulhoff M, Spranz D, Zeifang F (2015) Are there differences between stemless and conventional stemmed shoulder prostheses in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis? BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0723-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.Uschok S, Magosch P, Moe M, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P (2016) Is the stemless humeral head replacement clinically and radiographically a secure equivalent to standard stem humeral head replacement in the long-term follow-up? A prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elb Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.001
- 5.Huguet D, DeClercq G, Rio B, Teissier J, Zipoli B, Group T (2010) Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years' follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19(6):847–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Berth A, Pap G (2013) Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis: a comparison of the functional outcome after a minimum of two years follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol 14(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-012-0216-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Favard L, Katz D, Colmar M, Benkalfate T, Thomazeau H, Emily S (2012) Total shoulder arthroplasty—arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthropathies: results and complications after a minimum follow-up of 8 years according to the type of arthroplasty and etiology. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(4 Suppl):S41–S47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.04.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar