Impact of a new cryotherapy device on early rehabilitation after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a prospective randomised controlled trial
- 578 Downloads
The aim of this prospective, randomised and single blinded study was to evaluate the efficiency and safety of a new cryotherapy device in patients undergoing unilateral, primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our hypothesis was that patients administered to the new cryotherapy device would perform better than patients receiving a conventional standard cold therapy regimen.
Ninety-seven patients were randomised into two groups receiving either the cTreatment® (new cryotherapy device) or the standard cold therapy protocol (including cold pack application for six days after the surgical intervention). We evaluated the following endpoints consisting of range of motion (ROM), pain intensity, and knee girth on admission day and the second, fourth, and sixth post-operative day (POD).
A statistically significant benefit of the new cryotherapy device was detected regarding the ROM on the sixth POD with an average gain of 7 degrees (p = 0.021). Pain in the numeric rating scale (NRS) score in motion was significantly lower in the cTreatment® group on the second POD (p = 0.034). There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding the NRS in rest, patient controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption, and girth measurements. No adverse effects were observed in both study groups.
The new computer-controlled cooling therapy device provides benefits in terms of early post-operative remobilisation with respect to ROM and pain, which might be attributed to a reduced inflammatory response, as well as reduced secretion and bleeding. The cTreatment® system appears to be a safe and efficient procedure.
KeywordsTotal knee arthroplasty Cryotherapy Fast-track arthroplasty Pain relief Prospective randomised trial
Source of funding
The company Waegener provided funds to finance the study nurse who acquired data for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
MG and RWP have received funding by Waegener®, Belgium and financed study nurses to obtain the data. The remaining authors report no potential conflict of interest.
- 9.Scarcella JB, Cohn BT (1995) The effect of cold therapy on the postoperative course of total hip and knee arthroplasty patients. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 24(11):847–852Google Scholar
- 12.Martin SS, Spindler KP, Tarter JW, Detwiler KB (2002) Does cryotherapy affect intraarticular temperature after knee arthroscopy? Clin Orthop Relat Res (400):184–189Google Scholar
- 16.Stalman A, Berglund L, Dungnerc E, Arner P, Felländer-Tsai L (2011) Temperature-sensitive release of prostaglandin E2 and diminished energy requirements in synovial tissue with postoperative cryotherapy: a prospective randomized study after knee arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(21):1961–1968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Adie S, Kwan A, Naylor JM, Harris IA, Mittal R (2012) Cryotherapy following total knee replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD007911Google Scholar
- 23.Consort checklist. www.consort-statement.org. Accessed 18 November 2017
- 24.Randomizer. Web-based patient randomization service for multi-center clinical trials. www.randomizer.at Accessed 31 December 2016