Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1307–1312 | Cite as

Does arthroscopic resection of a too-long anterior process improve static disorders of the foot in children and adolescents?

  • Julien Bourlez
  • Pauline Joly-Monrigal
  • Fanny Alkar
  • Alexandre Laborde
  • Jerôme Cottalorda
  • Djamel Louahem
  • Marion Delpont
Original Paper
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

A too-long anterior process of the calcaneus is a common cause of pain and hind-foot instability. Our goal was to evaluate the early results of arthroscopic resection in terms of static foot disorders in children and adolescents.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 11 ft (10 patients). The inclusion criteria were treatment of TLAP by arthroscopic resection and a minimum follow-up period of six months. Surgery was indicated in cases with persistent symptomatic TLAP resistant to orthopaedic treatment.

Results

The mean age at surgery was 11 (range, 7–15) years. The mean follow-up duration was 15 (range, 8–28) months. Pre-operatively, we diagnosed four flat feet, two cavus feet and five feet with normal footprints, but loss of physiological hind-foot valgus. All patients presented with subtalar joint stiffness. At the last follow-up, four feet with no hind-foot valgus were normal, two were unchanged and the other feet had improved. The mean AOFAS increased from 61.9 (range, 47–73) to 89.1 (range, 71–97; P = 0.009). The mean radiological angles were near normal, exhibiting significant improvements in the lateral talo-metatarsal and Djian-Annonier angles.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic resection of a TLAP is safe. In the short term, the restoration of subtalar mobility reduces pain, and improves instability and static disorders. Longer follow-up of a larger patient series is required.

Keywords

Too-long anterior process Tarsal coalition Arthroscopy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the protocol of this investigation. All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee(s) and complied with the dictates of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and later amendments thereto. All patients gave written informed consent.

Conflict of interest

No author has any conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Pouliquen JC, Duranthon LD, Glorion C, Kassis B, Langlais J (1998) The too-long anterior process calcaneus: a report of 39 cases in 25 children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 18:333–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris RI, Beath T (1948) Etiology of peroneal spastic flat foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 30:624–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    El Hayek T, D’Ollone T, Rubio A, Lusakisimo S, Griffet J (2009) A too-long anterior process of the calcaneus: a report of 31 operated cases. J Pediatr Orthop B 18:163–166.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e32832b14c5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knörr J, Accadbled F, Abid A, Darodes P, Torres A, Cahuzac J-P, Sales de Gauzy J (2011) Arthroscopic treatment of calcaneonavicular coalition in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:565–568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.03.017 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bauer T, Golano P, Hardy P (2010) Endoscopic resection of a calcaneonavicular coalition. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:669–672.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1086-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Molano-Bernardino C, Bernardino CM, Golanó P, Garcia MA, López-Vidriero E (2009) Experimental model in cadavera of arthroscopic resection of calcaneonavicular coalition and its first in-vivo application: preliminary communication. J Pediatr Orthop B 18:347–353.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e32832f12cd CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lui TH (2016) Arthroscopic resection of too-long anterior process of the calcaneus. Arthrosc Tech 5:e1179–e1183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2016.07.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lui TH (2006) Arthroscopic resection of the calcaneonavicular coalition or the “too long” anterior process of the calcaneus. Arthroscopy 22:903.e1–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson KA, Strom DE (1989) Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 239:196–206Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15:349–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davids JR, Gibson TW, Pugh LI (2005) Quantitative segmental analysis of weight-bearing radiographs of the foot and ankle for children: normal alignment. J Pediatr Orthop 25:769–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Djian A, Annonier C, Denis A, Baudoin P (1968) Radiopodometry (principles and results). J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl 49:769–772PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knörr J, Soldado F, Menendez ME, Domenech P, Sanchez M, Sales de Gauzy J (2015) Arthroscopic talocalcaneal coalition resection in children. Arthroscopy 31:2417–2423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Usuelli FG, Montrasio UA (2012) The calcaneo-stop procedure. Foot Ankle Clin 17:183–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2012.03.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giannini S, Ceccarelli F, Benedetti MG, Catani F, Faldini C (2001) Surgical treatment of flexible flatfoot in children: a four-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:73–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chong D, Macwilliams B, Hennessey T, Teske N, Stevens P (2015) Prospective comparison of subtalar arthroereisis with lateral column lenghtening for painful flatfeet. J Pediatr Orthop B 24:345–353.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000000179 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mosca VS, Bevan WP (2012) Talocalcaneal tarsal coalitions and the calcaneal lengthening osteotomy: the role of deformity correction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1584–1594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harris RI (1955) Rigid valgus foot due to talocalcaneal bridge. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37:169–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gonzalez P, Kumar SJ (1990) Calcaneonavicular coalition treated by resection and interposition of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:71–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swiontkowski MF, Scranton PE, Hansen S (1983) Tarsal coalitions: long-term results of surgical treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 3:287–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mubarak SJ, Patel PN, Upasani VV, Moor MA, Wenger DR (2009) Calcaneonavicular coalition: treatment by excision and fat graft. J Pediatr Orthop 29:418–426.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181aa24c0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rosello O, Solla F, Oborocianu I, Chau E, Yagoubi F, Clément J-L, Rampal V (2016) Too-long calcaneal process: results of surgical treatment and prognostic factors. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:663–667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2016.01.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mitchell GP, Gibson JM (1967) Excision of calcaneo-navicular bar for painful spasmodic flat foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 49:281–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Inglis G, Buxton RA, Macnicol MF (1986) Symptomatic calcaneonavicular bars. The results 20 years after surgical excision. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:128–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rouvreau P, Pouliquen JC, Langlais J, Glorion C, de Cerqueira Daltro G (1994) Synostosis and tarsal coalitions in children. A study of 68 cases in 47 patients. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 80:252–260PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service de Chirurgie PédiatriqueHôpital LapeyronieMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations