International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 1113–1117 | Cite as

Aetiopathogenesis of cuff-tear arthropathy: Could juvenile joint laxity be considered a predisposing factor?

  • Stefano Gumina
  • Alessandro Castagna
  • Vittorio Candela
  • Teresa Venditto
  • Giuseppe Giannicola
  • Mario Borroni
  • Ciro Villani
Original Paper
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Although many hypotheses have been formulated, aetiopathogenesis of cuff-tear arthropathy (CTA) is still motive for discussion. Since prevalence of CTA is notoriously higher in women, as is joint hypermobility, we hypothesised a possible correlation between the two conditions.

Methods

One hundred thirty-three (n = 133) consecutive patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis [48 men, 85 women; mean age (SD) 72.32 (7.05)] were divided into two groups: Groups 1 (CTA) and 2 (concentric shoulder arthropathy) comprised 71 (22 men, 49 women) and 62 (26 men, 36 women), respectively. The presence of current or previous joint hypermobility was assessed using two standardised methodologies: the Beighton criteria score, and a five-item self-report questionnaire. Data were submitted to statistical analysis.

Results

A moderate association between Beighton criteria and the five-item self-report (φ = 0.481, p < 0.001) was detected. Beighton criteria led to a diagnosis of joint hypermobility in 16 patients (22.5%) in Group 1 and 15 (24.2%) in Group 2. According to five-item self-report questionnaire, juvenile joint laxity was diagnosed in 11 (15.5%) and 12 (19.4%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. No significant association between groups and the Beighton criteria [χ2(1) = 0.051, p = 0.82] and five-item self-report questionnaire [χ2(1) = 0.67, p = 0.41] was found.

Conclusion

Juvenile joint hyperlaxity is not a predisposing factor for cuff arthropathy. Further studies will be needed to explain CTA aetiopathogenesis.

Levels of Evidence: III.

Keywords

Cuff-tear arthropathy Aetiology Shoulder arthropathy Joint hypermobility Juvenile joint laxity Beighton score Beighton criteria Five-item self-report questionnaire 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors, their immediate family, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated did not receive any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Neer CS, Craig EV, Fukuda H (1983) Cuff-tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1232–1244JCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Neer CS, Watson K, Stanton F (1982) Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:319–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jensen KL, Williams GR Jr, Russell IJ, Rockwood CA Jr (1999) Rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1312–1324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ecklund KJ, Lee TQL, Tibone J, Gupta R (2007) Rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:340–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkhart SS (1992) Fluoroscopic comparison of kinematic patterns in massive rotator cuff tears. A suspension bridge model. Clin Orthop Relat Res 284:144–152Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collins DN, Harryman DT II (1997) Arthroplasty for arthritis and rotator cuff deficiency. Orthop Clin N Am 28:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gotoh M, Hamada K, Yamakawa H, Nakamura M, Yamazaki H, Ueyama Y, Tamaoki N, Inoue A, Fukuda H (2000) Perforation of rotator cuff increases interleukin 1beta production in the synovium of glenohumeral joint in rotator cuff diseases. J Rheumatol 27:2886–2892PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Osawa T, Shinozaki T, Takagishi K (2005) Multivariate analysis of biochemical markers in synovial fluid from the shoulder joint for diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Rheumatol Int 25:436–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yoshihara Y, Hamada K, Nakajima T, Fujikawa K, Fukuda H (2001) Biochemical markers in the synovial fluid of glenohumeral joints from patients with rotator cuff tear. J Orthop Res 19:573–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kramer EJ, Bodendorfer BM, Laron D, Wong J, Kim HT, Liu X, Feeley BT (2013) Evaluation of cartilage degeneration in a rat model of rotator cuff tear arthropathy. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:1702–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beighton PH, Solomon L, Soskolne CL (1973) Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32:413–417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hakim A, Grahame R (2003) Joint hypermobility. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17:989–1004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hakim AJ, Grahame R (2003) A simple questionnaire to detect hypermobility: an adjunct to the assessment of patients with diffuse musculoskeletal pain. Int J Clin Pract 57:163–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Acasuso Diaz M, Collantes Estevez E, Sanchez Guijo P (2003) Joint hyperlaxity and musculoligamentous lesions: study of a population of homogeneous age, sex and physical exertion. Br J Rheumatol 32:120–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chahal J, Leiter J, McKee MD, Whelan DB (2010) Generalized ligamentous laxity as a predisposing factor for primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:1238–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walch G, Agostini JY, Levigne C, Nové-Josserand L (1995) Recurrent anterior and multidirectional instability of the shoulder. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 81:682–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Samitier G, Alentorn-Geli E, Torrens C, Wright TW (2015) Reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Part 1: systematic review of clinical and functional outcomes. Int J Shoulder Surg 9:24–31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bulbena A, Duro JC, Porta M, Faus S, Vallescar R, Martin-Santos R (1992) Clinical assessment of hypermobility of joints: assembling criteria. J Rheumatol 19:115–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Juul-Kristensen B, Rogind H, Jensen DV, Remvig L (2007) Interexaminer reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 46:1835–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gumina S, Carbone S, Campagna V, Candela V, Sacchetti FM, Giannicola G (2013) The impact of aging on rotator cuff tear size. Musculoskelet Surg 97(Suppl 1):69–72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-013-0263-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anatomy, Histology, Legal Medicine and OrthopedicsSapienza, University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Chirurgico Ortopedico Traumatologico (ICOT)LatinaItaly
  3. 3.Shoulder Unit, IRCCS Humanitas InstituteMilanItaly
  4. 4.Policlinico Umberto IRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations