Results with nine years mean follow up on one hundred and three KAPS® uni knee arthroplasties: eighty six medial and seventeen lateral
- 209 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to present the results of the KAPS® uni knee arthroplasty system, both mobile and fixed bearing with reference to function, alignment and complications in 103 implants with a mean follow-up of nine years.
This was a retrospective study of 103 unicompartimental knee arthroplasties in 89 patients operated on between March 2005 and March 2010. The population was composed of 50 males and 39 females, with a mean age of 70.5 ± 7.5 years (41 – 90). Eighty-seven patients had a genu varum deformity (84.5%), one of whom had an osteoid osteoma of the lateral tibial plateau and 16 patients had a genu valgum (15.5%). Eighty-six medial prostheses were implanted (82 mobile bearings and 4 fixed bearings) and 17 lateral prostheses (all fixed bearings) including the osteoid osteoma.
At a mean follow-up of 107.5 months (73–138), 72 knees (58 patients) were reviewed (70%). The mean IKS score was of 173 ± 31 points (58 – 200). The mean Oxford knee score was 21 ± 8 points (12 – 50). The cumulated survival rate at a follow up of 132 months was 98.2%.
The KAPS® unicompartmental knee arthroplasty gives efficacious and safe outcomes in the majority of cases at a mean follow-up of nine years. The availability of both fixed and mobile bearings with the same instrumentation, allowing to choose the right implant intra-operatively, is a great advantage in order to avoid the occurrence of some complications, specific to mobile bearing prostheses (dislocation and over-correction).
KeywordsGonarthrosis Unicompartimental knee arthroplasty Mobile bearing Genu varum Genu valgum
There is no funding source.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this article.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1.Borus T, Thornhill T (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15:9–18Google Scholar
- 2.Marmor L (1982) The Marmor knee replacement. Orthop Clin N Am 13:55–64Google Scholar
- 3.Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J (1986) Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:21–42Google Scholar
- 16.Saragaglia D, Bonnin M, Dejour D, Deschamps G, Chol C, Chabert B, Refaie R, the French Society of Hip and Knee (2013) Results of a French multicentre retrospective experience with four hundred and eighteen failed unicondylar knee arthroplasties. Int Orthop 37:1273–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1915-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar