International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 6, pp 1253–1258 | Cite as

The prevalence and risk factors for delayed union of the superior pubic ramus at one year after curved periacetabular osteotomy: its risk factor and outcome

  • Ayumi Matsunaga
  • Shunsuke Akiho
  • Koichi Kinoshita
  • Masatoshi Naito
  • Takuaki Yamamoto
Original Paper
  • 78 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Curved periacetabular osteotomy (CPO) has been developed for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia. While several studies have reported its good clinical results, the complications of CPO include delayed union and nonunion of the superior pubic ramus. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of delayed union of the pubis one year after CPO, and to determine the risk factors for this complication.

Methods

The study examined 113 hips that underwent CPO between 2008 and 2012. Delayed union was assessed based on the anteroposterior radiography one year after CPO. A superior pubic ramus union group (U group) and a delayed union group (D group) were retrospectively compared regarding patient characteristics, clinical evaluations, and radiographic parameters.

Results

Delayed union rate was 16.8%. The D group contained a significantly greater proportion of smokers (p < 0.001). The gap at the pubic osteotomy site on CT coronal images was significantly larger in the D group (p < 0.001), and the cut-off value for the risk of nonunion was larger than 5.1 mm. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that smoking (OR 10.7, 95% CI 2.1–55.4) and a gap at the superior pubic ramus >5.1 mm (OR 16.5, 95% CI 3.7–73.7) were significantly associated with delayed union as independent risk factors.

Conclusion

The prevalence of delayed union one year after CPO was 16.8%. Smoking and a gap larger than 5.1 mm at the pubic osteotomy site are risk factors for delayed union after CPO.

Keywords

Periacetabular osteotomy Complication Delayed union and nonunion Superior pubic ramus Risk factor 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Disclosure statement

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Aronson J (1986) Osteoarthritis of the young adult hip: etiology and treatment. Instr Course Lect 35:119–128PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Nakamura T (1989) Primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res 241:190–196Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naito M, Shiramizu K, Akiyoshi Y, Ezoe M, Nakamura Y (2005) Curved periacetabular osteotomy for treatment of dysplastic hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 433:129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW (1988) A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:26–36Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clohisy JC, Schutz AL, John LS, Schoenecker PL, Wright RW (2009) Periacetabular osteotomy: a systematic literature review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(8):2041–2052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kralj M, Mavcic B, Antolic V, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V (2005) The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: clinical, radiographic and mechanical 7-15-year follow-up of 26 hips. Acta Orthop 76(6):833–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matta JM, Stover MD, Siebenrock K (1999) Periacetabular osteotomy through the smith-Petersen approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:21–32Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clohisy JC, Barrett SE, Gordon JE, Delgado ED, Schoenecker PL (2005) Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of severe acetabular dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):254–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Curry MC, Schoenecker PL (2007) Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia associated with major aspherical femoral head deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(7):1417–1423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davey JP, Santore RF (1999) Complications of periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peters CL, Erickson JA, Hines JL (2006) Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(9):1920–1926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siebenrock KA, Schöll E, Lottenbach M, Ganz R (1999) Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Trousdale RT, Ekkernkamp A, Ganz R, Wallrichs SL (1995) Periacetabular and intertrochamteric osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(1):73–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trumble SJ, Mayo KA, Mast JW (1999) The periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum 2 year follow up in more than 100 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zaltz I, Baca G, Kim YJ, Schoenecker P, Trousdale R, Sierra R, Sucato D, Sink E, Beaulé P, Millis MB, Podeszwa D, Clohisy JC (2014) Complications associated with the periacetabular osteotomy: a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(23):1967–1974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tönnis D, Heinecke A (1999) Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(12):1747–1770CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wiberg G (1939) The anatomy and roentgenographic appearance of a normal hip joint. Acta Chir Scand 83(Suppl 58):7–38Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teratani T, Naito M, Shiramizu K, Nakamura Y, Moriyama S (2008) Modified pubic osteotomy for medialization of the femoral head in periacetabular osteotomy: a retrospective study of 144 hips. Acta Orthop 79(4):474–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Massie WK, Howorth MB (1950) Congenital dislocation of the hip. Part I. Method of grading results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 32-A(3):519–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yasunaga Y, Takahashi K, Ochi M, Ikuta Y, Hisatome T, Nakashiro J, Yamamoto S (2003) Rotational acetabular osteotomyin patients forty-six years of age or older: comparison with younger patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:266–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lequesne M, de Seze S (1961) False profile of the pelvis. A new radiographic incidence for the study of the hip. Its use in dysplasias and different coxopathies. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 28:643–652 in French PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee JJ, Patel R, Biermann JS, Dougherty PJ (2013) The musculoskeletal effects of cigarette smoking. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(9):850–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brown CW, Orme TJ, Richardson HD (1986) The rate of pseudarthrosis (surgical nonunion) in patients who are smokers and patients who are nonsmokers: a comparison study. Spine 11(9):942–943CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Andersen T, Christensen FB, Laursen M, Høy K, Hansen ES, Bünger C (2001) Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 26(23):2623–2628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Møller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T, Tønnesen H (2002) Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomized clinical trial. Lancet 359(9301):114–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayumi Matsunaga
    • 1
  • Shunsuke Akiho
    • 1
  • Koichi Kinoshita
    • 1
  • Masatoshi Naito
    • 2
  • Takuaki Yamamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryFukuoka University Faculty of MedicineFukuokaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryFukuoka Sanno HospitalFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations