Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive treatment of pathological fractures of the humeral shaft

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most patients with pathological fractures due to cancer metastasis have a limited life expectancy. Orthopaedic procedures, therefore, should be minimally invasive in order to avoid additional surgical morbidity. The purpose of this study was to analyse the results of minimally invasive approaches, including locked intramedullary nailing, followed by early postoperative radiation for pathological humeral shaft fractures. Twenty-four pathological fractures of the humerus diaphysis in 23 patients were treated with the prospective protocol, including antegrade unreamed intramedullary nailing and postoperative radiotherapy (20 Gy and five fractions). The patients and results of the surgery were evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society upper extremity scoring system. All patients had a stable extremity, and the average function of 20 patients was 64% of the normal upper extremity function. Only one patient required revision surgery. The minimally invasive treatment of patients with pathological fractures of the humeral shaft with closed unreamed intramedullary nailing combined with adjuvant radiotherapy is an effective and safe procedure, even in seriously ill patients.

Résumé

Un grand nombre de patients avec des fractures pathologiques secondaires à des métastases ont une espérance de vie diminuée. Les traitements orthopédiques avec technique mini-invasive permettent de diminuer la morbidité chirurgicale. Le propos de cette étude est d’analyser les résultats d’une technique avec voie d’abord mini-invasive pour enclouage centro-médullaire verouillé suivi d’une irradiation post-opératoire pour des tumeurs de la diaphyse humérale. 24 fractures pathologiques de la diaphyse humérale sur 23 patients ont été traitées de façon prospective, le protocole incluant un clou centro-médullaire mis sans alésage par voie antérograde et une radiothérapie de 20 Gy en 5 séances. Les patients et les résultats de la chirurgie ont été évalués grâce au score de la Société des tumeurs musculo squelettiques. Tous les patients sont parfaitement stables avec une amélioration globale fonctionnelle chez 20% des patients, une fonction de l’extrémité supérieure normale dans 64%. Un seul patient a nécessité une reprise chirurgicale. La voie d’abord mini-invasive chez ces patients présentant des fractures pathologiques de la diaphyse humérale traités par enclouage centro-médullaire sans alésage combiné à une radiothérapie adjuvante est un traitement qui permet d’avoir des résultats certains avec une bonne sécurité même chez des patients gravement atteints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atesok K, Liebergall M, Sucher E, Temper M, Mosheiff R, Peyser A (2007) Treatment of pathological humeral shaft fractures with unreamed humeral nail. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1493–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer HCF, Wedin R (1995) Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66:143–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Choong PFM (2003) Cardiopulmonary complications of intramedullary fixation of long bone metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:S245–S253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clayer MT, Tang X (2007) Low risk of cardiac events during intramedullary instrumentation of lung cancer metastases. Acta Orthop Scand 78(4):547–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman RE (2006) Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12:6243–6249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Damron TA, Sim TH, Shives TC, An KN, Rock MG, Pritchard DJ (1996) Intercalary spacers in the treatment of segmentally destructive diaphyseal humeral lesions in disseminated malignancies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324:233–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dijkstra PDS, Wiggers T, van Geel AN, Boxma H (1994) Impending and actual pathological fractures in patients with bone metastases of the long bones. A retrospective study of 233 surgically treated fractures. Eur J Surg 160:535–542

    Google Scholar 

  8. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:241–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flemming JE, Beals RK (1986) Pathologic fracture of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 203:258–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Frassica DA (2003) General principles of external beam radiation therapy for skeletal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:S158–S164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frassica FJ, Frassica DA (2003) Evaluation and treatment of metastases to the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:S212–S218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunt KJ, Gollogly S, Randall RL (2006) Surgical fixation of pathologic fractures: an evaluation of evolving treatment methods. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 63:77–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacofsky DJ, Papagelopoulos PJ, Sim FH (2003) Advances and challenges in the surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 415:S14–S18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson JA, Berkshire A, Leighton RK, Gross M, Chess DG, Petrie D (1995) Some basic biomechanical characteristics of medullary pressure generation during reaming of the femur. Injury 26:451–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Wakai K, Sugiura H, Kataoka T, Nakanishi K (2005) Prognostic factors and a scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:698–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin J, Hou SM (1999) Antegrade locked nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:201–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin PP, Mirza AN, Lewis VO, Cannon CP, Tu SM, Tannir NM, Yasko AW (2007) Patient survival after surgery for osseous metastases from renal cell carcinoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1794–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Noger M, Berli MC, Fasel JHD, Hoffmeyer PJ (2007) The risk of injury to neurovascular structures from distal locking screws of the unreamed humeral nail (UHN): a cadaveric study. Injury 38:954–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Perez CA, Bradfield JS, Morgan HC (1972) Management of pathologic fractures. Cancer 29:684–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Price P, Hoskin PJ, Easton D, Austin D, Palmer SG, Yarnold JR (1986) Prospective randomised trial of single and multifraction radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of painful bony metastases. Radiother Oncol 6:247–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Prince EJ, Breien KM, Fehringer EV, Mormino MA (2004) The relationship of proximal locking screws to the axillary nerve during antegrade humeral nail insertion of four commercially available implants. J Orthop Trauma 18:585–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Redmond BJ, Biermann JS, Blasier RB (1996) Interlocking intramedullary nailing of pathological fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:891–896

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ward EF, White JL (1989) Interlocked intramedullary nailing of the humerus. Orthopedics 12:135–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wedin R, Bauer HCF, Wersäll P (1999) Failures after operation for skeletal metastatic lesions of long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res 358:128–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yazawa Y, Frassica FJ, Chao EYS, Pritchard DJ, Sim FH, Shives TC (1990) Metastatic bone disease. A study of the surgical treatment of 166 pathologic humeral and femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 251:213–219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onder Ofluoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ofluoglu, O., Erol, B., Ozgen, Z. et al. Minimally invasive treatment of pathological fractures of the humeral shaft. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 707–712 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0540-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0540-0

Keywords

Navigation