Skip to main content
Log in

The treatment of dislocated humeral head fractures with a new proximal intramedullary nail system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new proximal humerus nail (Sirus) for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures has become available. This paper presents the clinical and radiological outcome of the first collective study of 36 patients. Evaluation was performed prospectively. An antero-acromial approach was used for all patients. Three fixed-angle screws were inserted in a locking technique. Thirty-six fractures were fixed with the Sirus nail. These were dislocated 2- and 3-part fractures as described by Neer (J Bone Joint Surg 52:1077–1089). Outcomes were evaluated using the Constant score. Of the 36 patients evaluated 23 had sustained a 2-part fracture and 13 a 3-part fracture. The average age at surgery was 71.2 years (range, 30–93). In 75% of the cases, good to very good outcomes were achieved. Outcomes were satisfactory in 13.8% of the cases. Twenty-five fractures were treated in a closed technique. Average operating time was 41 minutes (range, 19–106) with a fluoroscopy time of 0.6 minutes (range, 0.4–2.6). Secondary fragment dislocation occurred in two cases. After 12.1 months the average Constant score was 79.2 (range, 46–100). Initial clinical experience with the Sirus nail indicates that the procedure is straightforward and has a low complication rate. Functional outcomes are predominantly good to very good. Large fragments of the greater tuberosity and 4-part fractures are beyond the scope of this application.

Résumé

Un nouveau clou (Sirus) a été utilisé pour les fractures proximales de l’humérus. Ce travail fait le point sur les 36 premiers patients traités de cette façon. Le clou est verrouillé par trois vis dans trois directions différentes. 36 fractures ont été traitées de la sorte qu’il s’agisse de fracture de type 2 ou de fracture à 2 ou 3 fragments selon la description de Neer (J Bone Joint Surg 52:1077–1089). Le devenir de ces patients a été évalué selon le score de Constant. Sur les 36 patients évalués, 23 présentaient une fracture à 2 fragments et 13 à 3 fragments. L’âge moyen à l’intervention était de 71.2 ans (30 à 93). Ce traitement a permis d’obtenir également 75% de bons et très bons résultats. Le devenir a été satisfaisant dans 13.8% des cas. 25 fractures ont été traitées à foyers fermés. Le temps opératoire moyen a été de 41 minutes (de 19 à 106) et le temps d’utilisation de l’amplificateur de brillance de 0.6 minute (de 0.4 à 2.6). Un débricolage de la fracture est survenu dans deux cas. Après 12.1 mois d’évolution le score de Constant était en moyenne de 79.2 (de 46 à 100). Cette première expérience clinique montre que le taux de complications était relativement faible avec le traitement de ces fractures par le clou Sirus. Le devenir fonctionnel de ces patients reste bon ou très bon. Les fractures plus importantes de la grosse tubérosité ou les fractures à 4 fragments restent actuellement un sujet à l’étude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bathis H, Tingart M, Bouillon B, Tiling T (2001) Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Is the T-plate still adequate osteosynthesis procedure? Zentralbl Chir 126:211–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum J, Rommens PM, Janzing H (1997) The unreamed humeral nail: a biological osteosynthesis of the upper arm. Acta Chir Belg 97(4):184–189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blum J, Rommens PM (2002) Proximal interlocking of humeral intramedullary nails and risk of axillary nerve injury. Unfallchirurg 105(1):9–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Damanakis K, Schaal O, Mann J, Muller KH (1996) Modified treatment concept in fractures of the humeral head in elderly patients. Unfallchirurg 99:561–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Füchtmeier B, May R, Hente R, Maghsudi M, Völk M, Hammer J, Nerlich M, Prantl L (2007) Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of new intra and extramedullary implants. Arch Orthop Traum Surg (April 25; Epub ahead of print)

  7. Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Vinh TS (1990) The arterial vascularization of the humeral head. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg 72:1486–1494

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gregory PR, Sanders RW (1997) Compression plating versus intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 5(4):215–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Habermeyer P (1997) Fracture of the head of the humerus. Unfallchirurg 100:820–837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hente R, Kampshoff J, Kinner B, Füchtmeier B, Nerlich M (2004) Treatment of dislocated 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus with an angle-stabilizing fixation plate. Unfallchirurg 107:769–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herscovici D Jr, Saunders DT, Johnson MP, Sanders R, Di Pasquale T (2000) Percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop 375:97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hessmann MH, Rommens PM (2001) Osteosynthesis techniques in proximal humeral fractures. Chirurg 72(11):1235–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Köstler W, Strohm PC, Sudkamp NP (2002) New techniques for bone synthesis on the humerus. Chirurg 73:969–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuner EH, Siebler G (1987) Dislocation fractures of the proximal humerus—results following surgical treatment. A follow-up study of 167 cases. Unfallchirurgie 13:64–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lill H, Josten C (2001) Conservative or operative treatment of humeral head fractures in the elderly? Chirurg 72:1224–1234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lill H, Hepp P, Rose T, Konig K, Josten C (2004) The angle stable locking-proximal-humerus-plate (LPHP) for proximal humeral fractures using a small anterior-lateral-deltoid-splitting-approach - technique and first results. Zentralbl Chir 129(1):43–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mittlmeier TW, Stedtfeld HW, Ewert A, Beck M, Frosch B, Gradl G (2003) Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with an angular and sliding stable antegrade locking nail (Targon PH). J Bone Joint Surg Am 85A(Suppl 4):136–146

    Google Scholar 

  18. Misra A, Kapur R, Maffulli N (2001) Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults—a systematic review of management. Injury 32:363–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Müller F, Voithenleitner R, Schuster C, Angele P, Weigel B (2006) Operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures with helix wire. Unfallchirurg 109(12):1041–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neer CS (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg 52:1077–1089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Resch H, Povacz P, Frohlich R, Wambacher M (1997) Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Riemer BL, D’Ambrosia R, Kellam JF, Butterfield SL, Burke CJ (1993) The anterior acromial approach for antegrade intramedullary nailing of the humeral diaphysis. Orthopedics 16(11):1219–1223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stedtfeld HW, Attmanspacher W, Thaler K, Frosch B (2003) Fixation of humeral head fractures with antegrade intramedullary nailing. Zentralbl Chir 128(1):6–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK (2002) Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1919–1925

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Tornkvist H (1997) Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:412–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Füchtmeier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Füchtmeier, B., Bröckner, S., Hente, R. et al. The treatment of dislocated humeral head fractures with a new proximal intramedullary nail system. International Orthopaedics (SICO 32, 759–765 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0390-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0390-1

Keywords

Navigation