Skip to main content
Log in

Percutaneous pinning using threaded pins as a treatment option for unstable two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a retrospective study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective study was designed to evaluate the results of closed reduction and percutaneous pinning using threaded pins as a treatment option for fractures of the humeral head. Patients who suffered two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated by this method of fixation were included. Fifty patients (32 females and 18 males) with an average age of 50 years were clinically evaluated at an average of 2.5 years after this procedure (range 1–4 years). The Constant score was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. Preoperative and postoperative X-rays were also assessed. Out of 50 patients, 18 (36%) obtained excellent results, 17 (34%) good results, eight (16%) fair results and seven (14%) achieved only poor results. The average Constant score was 81 (range 60–100). Fractures confined to the surgical or anatomical neck generally did better than those associated with a greater tuberosity fragment (average score 86 versus 78). Patients who required shaft stabilisation and in addition to reduction and fixation of the greater tuberosity showed a lower average score (68). There were no cases of avascular necrosis, neurovascular complications or deep infections. A significant loss of fracture position due to failure of internal fixation occurred in seven cases, three of these patients underwent revision surgery. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning offers a good fracture position and stability with minimal soft tissue damage. We recommend that displaced two- and three- part fractures of the humeral head should be treated in this manner. However these patients should be monitored closely for a period of four weeks, since secondary displacement and failure of fixation can occur in this period. Careful patient selection may minimise these complications.

Résumé

Etude retrospective de la réduction à foyer fermé et de la fixation percutanée avec des broches filetées des fractures à deux et trois fragments de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus. Method : 50 patients, d’âge moyen 50 ans, ont été évalués cliniquement à un délai moyen de 2,5 ans après l’opération.Le score de Constant ainsi que les radiographies pré et post opératoires ont été utilisés pour l’appréciation. ResultsSur 50 patients 18 obtenaient un excellent résultat, 17 un bon résultat, 8 un résultat moyen et 7 un mauvais résultat. Le score de Constant moyen était de 81 (de 60 à 100). Les fractures isolées du col anatomique ou chirurgical avaient un meilleure évolution que celles associées à une fracture de la grosse tubérosité ( score de 86 au lieu de 78).Les patients qui ont nécessité une réduction et une fixation de la grosse tubérosité en plus de la stabilisation diaphysaire avaient un score moyen plus bas (68). Il n’y avait pas de nécrose, d’infection profonde ni de trouble neurovasculaire. Une perte de réduction est survenu dans 7 cas avec nécessité de reprise chirurgicale 3 fois. Conclusions : la réduction fermée avec fixation par broches percutanées permet une bonne stabilisation de la fracture avec un minimum de dommages aux parties molles. Nous préconisons ce traitement pour les fractures à 2 et 3 fragments de la tête humérale en recommandant une surveillance étroite pendant les 4 premières semaines car le déplacement secondaire et l’échec de la fixation représente un écueil sérieux de la méthode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hagino H, Yamamoto K (1999) Changing incidence of hip distal radius and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori prefecture, Japan. Bone 24(3):265–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron JA, Karagas M, Barett J, Kniffin W, Mlenka D, Mayor M, Keller RB (1996) Basic epidemiology of fractures of the upper and lower limb among Americans over 65 years of age. Epidemiology 7(6):612–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Neer CS 2nd (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1077–1089

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koval KJ, Gallagher MA (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79(2):203–207

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wretenberg P, Ekelund A (1997) Acute hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture in old patients. A retrospective evaluation of 18 patients followed for 2–7 years. Acta Orthop Scand 68(2):121–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Skutek M, Fremerey RW (1998) Level of physical activity in elderly patients after hemiarthroplasty for 3 and 4 parts fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117(4–5):252–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wachtl SW, Marti CB, Hoogewoud HM, Jacob RP, Goutier E (2000) Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using multiple intramedullary flexible nails. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120(3):171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bungaro P, Pascarella R, Rollo G, Di Ginnaro GL, Ercolani C (1998) Osteosynthesis with percutaneous wiring in fractures of the proximal humerus. Chir Organi Nov 83 (4):381–386

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Szyszkowitz R, Schippinger G (1999) Fracture of the proximal humerus. Unfallchirurg 102(6):422–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams GR, Wong KL (2000) Two part and three part fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Orthop Clin North Am 31(1):1–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Naranja RJ, Iannoti JP (2000) Displaced 3 and 4 parts proximal humerus fractures: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Surg 8(6):373–382

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen CY, Chao EK (1998) Closed management and percutaneous fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures. J Trauma 45(6):1039–1045

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Soete PJ, Clayson PE (1999) Transitory percutaneous pinning in fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8(6):569–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Resch H (1997) Percutaneous fixation of three and four parts fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79(2):295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itay Fenichel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenichel, I., Oran, A., Burstein, G. et al. Percutaneous pinning using threaded pins as a treatment option for unstable two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a retrospective study. International Orthopaedics (SICO 30, 153–157 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0058-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0058-7

Keywords

Navigation