Skip to main content
Log in

CT/MR LI-RADS 2018: clinical implications and management recommendations

  • Review
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unique among solid organ tumors, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), may be diagnosed by imaging alone, without the need for biopsy. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was developed to provide high-specificity diagnosis of HCC based on imaging while also standardizing the assessment and reporting of the entire spectrum of lesions and pseudolesions encountered in patients at risk for this malignancy. In this pictorial review, we discuss management recommendations associated with CT/MR LI-RADS observations. We emphasize the rationale for the recommendations and the role of multidisciplinary management discussion, and we provide a framework for standardized reporting. Management of patients who undergo ultrasound (US) for screening and surveillance or those who undergo diagnostic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is beyond the scope of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of HCC: Consider the Population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(0):S2-S6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182872f29

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. CDC-Liver Cancer. February 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/liver/index.htm. Accessed April 17, 2018.

  3. Chou R, Cuevas C, Fu R, et al. Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(10):697. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-2509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chou R, Cuevas C, Fu R, et al. Imaging Techniques for the Diagnosis and Staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK254191/. Accessed June 26, 2018.

  5. Hanna RF, Miloushev VZ, Tang A, et al. Comparative 13-year meta-analysis of the sensitivity and positive predictive value of ultrasound, CT, and MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol N Y. 2016;41(1):71-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0592-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elsayes KM, Hooker JC, Agrons MM, et al. 2017 Version of LI-RADS for CT and MR Imaging: An Update. RadioGraphics. 2017;37(7):1994-2017. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017170098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin C, et al. Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. April 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29913

  8. LI-RADS. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/LI-RADS. Accessed June 26, 2018.

  9. Kambadakone AR, Fung A, Gupta RT, et al. LI-RADS technical requirements for CT, MRI, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Abdom Radiol N Y. 2018;43(1):56-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1325-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kielar A, Fowler KJ, Lewis S, et al. Locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma and the new LI-RADS treatment response algorithm. Abdom Radiol N Y. 2018;43(1):218-230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1281-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology. 2011;260(1):174-181. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101913

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Marcovici PA, Taylor GA. Journal Club: Structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(6):1265-1271. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF. Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology. 2013;267(1):240-250. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12121502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Powell DK, Silberzweig JE. State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(2):226-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.08.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flusberg M, Ganeles J, Ekinci T, et al. Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of CT and MRI Reports for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis. J Am Coll Radiol JACR. 2017;14(9):1206-1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. ACR LI-RADS. https://cortex.acr.org/RadsPreview/CaseView.aspx?CaseId=Y9JbzYund5s%3D. Accessed September 29, 2018.

  17. Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, et al. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients. Radiology. September 2018:181494. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181494

  18. Fraum TJ, Tsai R, Rohe E, et al. Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Hepatic Malignancies in Patients at Risk: Diagnostic Performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2014. Radiology. 2017;286(1):158-172. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ronot M, Fouque O, Esvan M, Lebigot J, Aubé C, Vilgrain V. Comparison of the accuracy of AASLD and LI-RADS criteria for the non-invasive diagnosis of HCC smaller than 3cm. J Hepatol. 2018;68(4):715-723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.12.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sherman CB. Utilization and Accuracy of Biopsy in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Community based Setting. https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/jcgt/journal-of-clinical-gastroenterology-and-treatment-jcgt-2-026.php?jid=jcgt. Accessed August 12, 2018.

  21. Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C, et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: Prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008;47(1):97-104. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Song P, Cai Y, Tang H, Li C, Huang J. The clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide: A concise review and comparison of current guidelines from 2001 to 2017. Biosci Trends. 2017;11(4):389-398. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2017.01202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shukla A, Vadeyar H, Rela M, Shah S. Liver Transplantation: East versus West. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013;3(3):243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2013.08.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Practice Parameters for Documentation and Reporting | American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Practice-Parameters-and-Technical-Standards/Practice-Parameters-for-Documentation-and-Reporting. Accessed August 12, 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amita Kamath.

Additional information

CME activity

This article has been selected as the CME activity for the current month. Please visit https://ce.mayo.edu/node/81590 and follow the instructions to complete this CME activity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamath, A., Roudenko, A., Hecht, E. et al. CT/MR LI-RADS 2018: clinical implications and management recommendations. Abdom Radiol 44, 1306–1322 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1868-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1868-6

Keywords

Navigation