Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of renal stone composition by using fast kilovoltage switching dual-energy computed tomography compared to laboratory stone analysis: a pilot study

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively examine the diagnostic performance of fast kilovoltage switching dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in characterization of in vivo renal stone composition compared with postoperative stone analysis.

Methods

Consecutive consenting patients scheduled for endoscopic kidney stone surgery in a tertiary referral hospital from June 2015 to January 2016 were enrolled. Patients were preoperatively scanned with single-source, fast kilovoltage switching DECT. Stone compositions were determined regarding the effective atomic number measurements. Results of the stone compositions from DECT were compared to postoperative infrared spectroscopy stone analysis as the standard reference.

Results

For the 39 patients enrolled in the study, DECT was able to detect uric acid stone with sensitivity of 88.9% and specificity of 100%. There was 100% positive predictive value, 96.8% negative predictive value, and 97.4% accuracy. For non-contrast CT scan, sensitivity was 88.9%, specificity was 96.7%, positive predictive value was 88.9%, negative predictive value was 96.7%, and accuracy was 94.8%. Of the 39 samples examined, 21 (54%) were single composition, whereas 18 (46%) were combined. Single composition stones were correctly characterized by DECT in 100% (8/8) for uric acid. Whereas the result of uric acid stone containing stone discrimination in mixed composition was not so good with Zeff alone, iodine imaging can compensated this fault.

Conclusions

DECT provides excellent accuracy in characterizing uric acid stone compositions. With the addition of iodine image, all of uric acid-containing stones can be determined by the DECT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12(2–3):e86–e96

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Rule AD, Bergstralh EJ, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. (2009) Kidney stones and the risk for chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4(4):804–811

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Johri N, Cooper B, Robertson W, et al. (2010) An update and practical guide to renal stone management. Nephron Clin Pract 116(3):c159–c171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bultitude M, Smith D, Thomas K (2016) Contemporary management of stone disease: the new EAU urolithiasis guidelines for 2015. Eur Urol 69(3):483–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, et al. (2007) Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol. 14(12):1441–1447

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 16(2):256–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferrandino MN, Pierre SA, Simmons WN, et al. (2010) Dual-energy computed tomography with advanced postimage acquisition data processing: improved determination of urinary stone composition. J Endourol 24(3):347–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graser A, Johnson TR, Bader M, et al. (2008) Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience. Investig Radiol 43(2):112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boll DT, Patil NA, Paulson EK, et al. (2009) Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition–pilot study. Radiology. 250(3):813–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, Zhao R, Liu B, Yu Y (2013) Gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy computed tomography: a novel technique to determine urinary stone composition. Urology. 81(4):727–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, et al. (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with X-ray diffraction. Radiology. 257(2):394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stolzmann P, Kozomara M, Chuck N, et al. (2009) In vivo identification of uric acid stones with dual-energy CT: diagnostic performance evaluation in patients. Abdom Imaging. 35(5):629–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansouri M, Aran S, Singh A, et al. (2015) Dual-energy computed tomography characterization of urinary calculi: basic principles, applications and concerns. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 44(6):496–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Krasnicki T, Podgorski P, Guzinski M, et al. (2012) Novel clinical applications of dual energy computed tomography. Adv Clin Exp Med 21(6):831–841

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheir KZ, Mansour O, Madbouly K, et al. (2005) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast computerized tompography. Urol Res. 33:99–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaza RK, Platt JF, Cohan RH, et al. (2012) Dual-energy CT with single- and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract. Radiographics. 32(2):353–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gucuk A, Uyeturk U (2014) Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones. World J Nephrol 3(4):282–286

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zilberman DE, Ferrandino MN, Preminger GM, et al. (2010) In vivo determination of urinary stone composition using dual energy computerized tomography with advanced post-acquisition processing. J Urol 184(6):2354–2359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manglaviti G, Tresoldi S, Guerrer CS, et al. (2011) In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT. AJR 197(1):W76–W83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulkarni NM, Eisner BH, Pinho DF, et al. (2013) Determination of renal stone composition in phantom and patients using single-source dual-energy computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37(1):37–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Ms. Chulaluck Boonma and Mr. Weerachat Churawd for their assistances of the data analysis and research processes, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekkarin Chotikawanich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rompsaithong, U., Jongjitaree, K., Korpraphong, P. et al. Characterization of renal stone composition by using fast kilovoltage switching dual-energy computed tomography compared to laboratory stone analysis: a pilot study. Abdom Radiol 44, 1027–1032 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1787-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1787-6

Keywords

Navigation