Inter-radiologist agreement using Society of Abdominal Radiology-American Gastroenterological Association (SAR-AGA) consensus nomenclature for reporting CT and MR enterography in children and young adults with small bowel Crohn disease
To assess inter-radiologist agreement using the Society of Abdominal Radiology-American Gastroenterological Association (SAR-AGA) consensus recommendations for reporting CT/MR enterography exams in pediatric and young adult small bowel Crohn disease (CD).
Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective investigation; the requirement for informed consent was waived. 25 CT and 25 MR enterography exams performed in children and young adults (age range: 6–23 years) between January 2015 and April 2017 with a distribution of ileal CD severity (phenotype) were identified: normal or chronic CD without active inflammation (40%), active inflammatory CD (20%), stricturing CD (20%), and penetrating CD (20%). Five fellowship-trained pediatric radiologists, blinded to one another, documented key imaging findings and standardized impressions based on SAR-AGA consensus recommendations. Inter-radiologist agreement was evaluated using Fleiss’ multi-rater kappa statistic (κ) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Inter-radiologist agreement was moderate for all key imaging findings except presence of ulcerations (κ 0.37 [95% CI 0.28–0.46]) and sacculations (κ 0.31 [95% CI 0.23–0.40]). Agreement for standardized impressions was substantial for stricturing disease (κ 0.79 [95% CI 0.70–0.87]) and moderate for presence of inflammation (κ 0.49 [95% CI 0.44–0.56]) and penetrating disease (κ 0.58 [95% CI 0.49–0.67]). No significant difference in agreement was found between CT and MRI.
Agreement among five pediatric radiologists was moderate to substantial for SAR-AGA standardized impressions and fair to moderate for key imaging findings of pediatric and young adult CD.
KeywordsInflammatory bowel disease Crohn disease Enterography Pediatric Standardized reporting Inter-reader agreement
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was not funded.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
The requirement for informed consent was waived by the institutional review board.
- 12.Bruining DH, Zimmermann EM, Loftus EV, et al. (2018) Consensus recommendations for evaluation, interpretation, and utilization of computed tomography and magnetic resonance enterography in patients with small bowel Crohn’s disease. Radiology 154(4):1172–1194. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018171737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.RSNA (2009) RSNA radiology reporting initiative. http://reportingwiki.rsna.org/. Accessed 6 December 2017
- 18.Wildman-Tobriner B, Allen BC, Bashir MR, et al. (2017) Structured reporting of CT enterography for inflammatory bowel disease: effect on key feature reporting, accuracy across training levels, and subjective assessment of disease by referring physicians. Abdom Radiol . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1136-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wildman-Tobriner B, Allen BC, Davis JT, et al. (2017) Structured reporting of magnetic resonance enterography for pediatric Crohn’s disease: effect on key feature reporting and subjective assessment of disease by referring physicians. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 46(2):110–114. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.001 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Wallihan DB, Podberesky DJ, Sullivan J, et al. (2015) Diagnostic performance and dose comparison of filtered back projection and adaptive iterative dose reduction three-dimensional CT enterography in children and young adults. Radiology 276(1):233–242. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140468 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wallihan DB, Towbin AJ, Denson LA, Salisbury S, Podberesky DJ (2012) Inflammatory bowel disease in children and adolescents: assessing the diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of magnetic resonance enterography compared to histopathology. Acad Radiol 19(7):819–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.023 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Tielbeek JA, Makanyanga JC, Bipat S, et al. (2013) Grading Crohn disease activity with MRI: interobserver variability of MRI features, MRI scoring of severity, and correlation with Crohn disease endoscopic index of severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(6):1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.10341 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar