Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the frequency and severity of ovarian venous congestion on adult computed tomography

  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

While pelvic congestion syndrome and chronic pelvic pain are relatively common in women, no large- or medium-sized studies have been conducted to our knowledge to evaluate the frequency and severity of ovarian vein dilatation (OVD) on computed tomography (CT). The purpose of our study was therefore to analyze a large number of consecutive abdominal and pelvic CT scans in adult women to determine OVD frequency and severity.

Methods

An IRB-approved, single-institution retrospective analysis of 1042 consecutive abdominal and pelvic CT scans in women ages 25–65 was performed. Scans were evaluated for the presence and severity of OVD and association with “nutcracker anatomy.” A gradation scheme was developed based on quartile analysis.

Results

143 of the CT scans had OVD (13.7%). Of the positive scans, 96 were bilateral, 29 were left-side only, 18 were right-side only, and 18 had nutcracker-type compression of the left renal vein (14.4% of scans with left or bilateral OVD). In positive scans, the mean and median left OVD were 7.5 and 7 mm, respectively, and right-side were 7.2 and 7 mm, respectively. Based on quartile analysis, OVD grading was mild (< 6 mm), moderate (6–8 mm), or severe (> 8 mm), with moderate including the middle 50% of patients.

Conclusions

OVD was found on 13.7% of 1042 consecutive female abdominal and pelvic CT scans, with “nutcracker anatomy” present in 14.4% of the scans with left OVD. Moderate dilatation was defined as an OVD of 6–8 mm at the iliac crests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cura M, Cura A (2009) What is the significance of ovarian vein reflux detected by computed tomography in patients with pelvic pain? Clin Imaging 33(4):306–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Brien MT, Gillespie DL (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of the pelvic congestion syndrome. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymph Dis 3(1):96–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tropeano G, Di Stasi C, Amoroso S, Cina A, Scambia G (2008) Ovarian vein incompetence: a potential cause of chronic pelvic pain in women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139(2):215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rozenblit AM, Ricci ZJ, Tuvia J, Amis ED Jr (2001) Incompetent and dilated ovarian veins: a common CT finding in asymptomatic parous women. Am J Roentgenol 176(1):119–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grimm LJ, Engstrom BI, Nelson RC, Kim CY (2013) Incidental detection of nutcracker phenomenon on multidetector CT in an asymptomatic population: prevalence and associated findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37(3):415–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahlberg NE, Bartley O, Chidekel N (1966) Right and left gonadal vein: an anatomical and statistical study. Acta Radiol Diagn 4(6):593–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Desimpelaere JH, Seynaeve PC, Hagers YM, Appel BJ, Mortelmans LL (1999) Pelvic congestion syndrome: demonstration and diagnosis by helical CT. Abdom Imaging 21(1):100–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kennedy A, Hemingway A (1990) Radiology of ovarian varices. Br J Hosp Med 44(1):38–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Asciutto G, Asciutto KC, Mumme A, Geier B (2009) Pelvic venous incompetence: reflux patterns and treatment results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38(3):381–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mettler FA Jr, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, et al. (2008) Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys 95(5):502–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Belenky A, Bartal G, Atar E, Cohen M, Bachar GN (2002) Ovarian varices in healthy female kidney donors: incidence, morbidity, and clinical outcome. Am J Roentgenol 179(3):625–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Whiteley MS (2017) Objective measurements of pelvic venous reflux and stratification of severity of venous reflux in pelvic congestion syndrome due to pelvic venous reflux. Curr Med Res Opin. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1332987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dos Santos SJ, Holdstock JM, Harrison CC, Lopez AJ, Whiteley MS (2015) Ovarian vein diameter cannot be used as an indicator of ovarian venous reflux. Endovasc Surg 49(1):90–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nascimento AB, Mitchell DG, Holland G (2002) Ovarian veins: magnetic resonance imaging findings in an asymptomatic population. J Magn Reson Imaging 15(5):551–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim CY, Miller MJ, Merkle EM (2009) Time-resolved MR angiography as a useful sequence for assessment of ovarian vein reflux. Am J Roentgenol 193(5):e458–e463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Knuttinen MG, Xie K, Jani A, et al. (2015) Pelvic venous insufficiency: imaging diagnosis, treatment approaches, and therapeutic issues. Am J Roentgenol 204:448–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang DM, Kim HC, Nam DH, et al. (2012) Time-resolved MR angiography for detecting and grading ovarian venous reflux: comparison with conventional venography. Br J Radiol 85:e117–e122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Aikimnbaev K, Balli TH, Akgul E, Aksungur AH (2017) Ovarian vein diameters measured by MDCT in women without evidence of pelvic congestion syndrome. Heart Vessels Transplant 1:43–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason C. Hoffmann.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was utilized for this study.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments of comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szaflarski, D., Sosner, E., French, T.D. et al. Evaluating the frequency and severity of ovarian venous congestion on adult computed tomography. Abdom Radiol 44, 259–263 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1707-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1707-9

Keyword

Navigation